Literature DB >> 31938540

Outcome measures used in the smartphone applications for the management of low back pain: a systematic scoping review.

Rachel Coe-O'Brien1, Leonard Joseph2, Raija Kuisma3, Aatit Paungmali4, Patraporn Sitilertpisan4, Ubon Pirunsan4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Smartphone applications (SPApps) have become a key tool for the self-management of low back pain (LBP). However, the scientific evidence behind the outcome measures used in SPApps for LBP is never investigated before. Therefore, this systematic review firstly assess the quality of the free SPApps for LBP, secondly examines the outcome measures used and thirdly evaluates the outcome measures against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set classifications for LBP.
METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted in the iTunes and Google Play™ on-line stores for LBP SPApps which are free to download. These searches were conducted using keywords suggested by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. SPApps were screened and downloaded to assess the quality using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). SPApps using outcome measures were reviewed separately to evaluate whether their outcome measures represented any of the ICF components for LBP.
RESULTS: The overall quality of the apps has a mean MARS score of 2.5/5. Out of 74 apps reviewed, only four apps had outcome measures that could be linked to ICF components for LBP. Two of the four categories comprising the LBP core set were well represented.
CONCLUSION: The overall quality of the SPApps for LBP is low. Only very few SPApps offer outcome measures to monitor their effectiveness in the management of LBP. There is very limited evidence to show that the outcome measures used in the apps represents all the four core sets of LBP criteria set by ICF. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care quality; Low back pain; Mobile health; Outcome measure; Patient

Year:  2020        PMID: 31938540      PMCID: PMC6940412          DOI: 10.1007/s13755-019-0097-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst        ISSN: 2047-2501


  24 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of self-management of low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinicius C Oliveira; Paulo H Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Rafael Z Pinto; Kathryn M Refshauge; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Antti Malmivaara; Roger Chou; Chris G Maher; Rick A Deyo; Mark Schoene; Gert Bronfort; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Sayeedul Hasan; Divyanshu Dubey; Sasmit Sarangi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  How do we know whether medical apps work?

Authors:  Margaret McCartney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-03-20

Review 5.  Linking ICF components to outcome measures for orthotic intervention for CMC OA: A systematic review.

Authors:  K Valdes; Nancy Naughton; Lori Algar
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  The ICF forms a useful framework for classifying individual patient goals in post-acute rehabilitation.

Authors:  Stefanie Lohmann; Julia Decker; Martin Müller; Ralf Strobl; Eva Grill
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Identification of the most common patient problems in patients with chronic conditions using the ICF checklist.

Authors:  Thomas Ewert; Michaela Fuessl; Alarcos Cieza; Christina Andersen; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.

Authors:  Damian Hoy; Lyn March; Peter Brooks; Fiona Blyth; Anthony Woolf; Christopher Bain; Gail Williams; Emma Smith; Theo Vos; Jan Barendregt; Chris Murray; Roy Burstein; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

10.  Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps.

Authors:  Stoyan R Stoyanov; Leanne Hides; David J Kavanagh; Oksana Zelenko; Dian Tjondronegoro; Madhavan Mani
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evidence-based digital support during 1 year after an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programme for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain to facilitate a sustainable return to work: a study protocol for a registry-based multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christina Turesson; Gunilla Liedberg; Linda Vixner; Monika Lofgren; Mathilda Björk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Digital Therapeutic Care and Decision Support Interventions for People With Low Back Pain: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Lewkowicz; Tamara Slosarek; Sarah Wernicke; Antonia Winne; Attila M Wohlbrandt; Erwin Bottinger
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  Development of a Digital Support Application With Evidence-Based Content for Sustainable Return to Work for Persons With Chronic Pain and Their Employers: User-Centered Agile Design Approach.

Authors:  Christina Turesson; Gunilla Liedberg; Mathilda Björk
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.