Background: Prior studies showed that aromatic amino acids (AAAs) could be used as potential gastric juice biomarkers in screening gastric cancer (GC). To identify new biomarkers for early diagnosis of GC, the characteristics of gastric juice free amino acid (GJFAA) profiling was determined. Method: First, gastric juice was collected from 130 consecutive patients who underwent gastroscopy. They were divided into GC group (n = 47) and non-neoplastic gastric disease (NGD) group (n = 83) according to the pathological diagnosis. The concentrations of 34 GJFAAs were examined by amino acid analyzer. Multivariate and univariate analyses were used for comparing the alterations of GJFAA profiles between the two groups. Then candidate differential GJFAAs were verified by LC-MS/MS in another set of patients, which included 32 GC patients and 38 NGD patients. The diagnostic performance of GJFAAs was evaluated by ROC curve. Results: Significant alterations in GJFAA profiles were observed in GC patients compared to NGD patients in the training set. A total of 14 amino acids were screened as differential GJFAAs. Leucine, threonine and serine were the most frequently altered. Combined AUC of the three non-AAAs [0.869 (95% CI, 0.805-0.934)] was superior to the combined three AAAs [0.841 (95% CI, 0.773-0.908)]. In addition, a combined AUC comprisingthe six ones was further improved to 0.871 (95% CI, 0.809-0.933) in the diagnosis of GC. A similar variation trend and diagnostic value were observed in the validation set. Conclusion: This study indicates the potential of GJFAA profiling as a promising approach for the early detection and screening of GC. IJCEP
Background: Prior studies showed that aromatic amino acids (AAAs) could be used as potential gastric juice biomarkers in screening gastric cancer (GC). To identify new biomarkers for early diagnosis of GC, the characteristics of gastric juice free amino acid (GJFAA) profiling was determined. Method: First, gastric juice was collected from 130 consecutive patients who underwent gastroscopy. They were divided into GC group (n = 47) and non-neoplastic gastric disease (NGD) group (n = 83) according to the pathological diagnosis. The concentrations of 34 GJFAAs were examined by amino acid analyzer. Multivariate and univariate analyses were used for comparing the alterations of GJFAA profiles between the two groups. Then candidate differential GJFAAs were verified by LC-MS/MS in another set of patients, which included 32 GCpatients and 38 NGDpatients. The diagnostic performance of GJFAAs was evaluated by ROC curve. Results: Significant alterations in GJFAA profiles were observed in GCpatients compared to NGDpatients in the training set. A total of 14 amino acids were screened as differential GJFAAs. Leucine, threonine and serine were the most frequently altered. Combined AUC of the three non-AAAs [0.869 (95% CI, 0.805-0.934)] was superior to the combined three AAAs [0.841 (95% CI, 0.773-0.908)]. In addition, a combined AUC comprisingthe six ones was further improved to 0.871 (95% CI, 0.809-0.933) in the diagnosis of GC. A similar variation trend and diagnostic value were observed in the validation set. Conclusion: This study indicates the potential of GJFAA profiling as a promising approach for the early detection and screening of GC. IJCEP