Literature DB >> 31938028

Highlight report: Role of choline phospholipid metabolism in tumor progression.

Wiebke Albrecht1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31938028      PMCID: PMC6953533          DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-2071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.



Recently, Sonkar and colleagues published a comprehensive review about the glycerophosphocholine (GPC) pathway and its role in cancer biology (Sonkar et al., 2019[24]). The authors address the enzymes of the GPC breakdown pathway; the oncogenic signaling pathways and transcription factors that regulate the GPC pathway; the interactions of the GPC pathway with other biochemical pathways such as glycolysis and triglyceride metabolism, and finally focus on non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques for detection of GPC in tumor tissue. Activation of choline metabolism is a critical step of cancer development and may lead to increased levels of phosphocholine, GPC and total choline-containing compounds (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011[14]; Griffiths et al., 1981[13]; Daly et al., 1987[8]; Aboagye and Bhujwalla, 1999[1]; Gillies et al., 2002[10]). These changes can be detected by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Baek et al., 2008[3]; Bolan et al., 2003[4]; He et al., 2003-2004[15]; Al-Saffar et al., 2017[2]; Glunde et al., 2011[11]). The glycerophosphodiesterase GPCPD1 is a key enzyme in choline metabolism that cleaves GPC to glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) and choline (Stewart et al., 2012[25]). This activity mediates integrin expression, tumor cell adhesion, spreading and migration (Lesjak et al., 2014[17]; Marchan et al., 2012[19]). Recently, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase1, which further processes G3P to generate lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been shown to promote tumor cell migration and is associated with poor survival in ovarian cancer (Marchan et al., 2017[19]). Besides phospholipid metabolism and metastasis tumor progression involves numerous further processes, such as proliferation (Schmidt et al., 2008[20]; Hellwig et al., 2016[16]; Siggelkow et al., 2012[23]), immune cell infiltration (Edlund et al., 2019[9]; Schmidt et al., 2012[21], 2018[22]; Godoy et al., 2014[12]), oxidative stress response (Cadenas et al., 2019[6]; 2014[5]; 2012[7]). Studies in future will have to show if targeting members of the glycerophosphocholine pathway will delay tumor progression. The present review of Sonkar et al. gives a comprehensive summary of the state-of-the-art in this field and is of high value to anyone interested in how choline-phospholipid-metabolism is linked to tumor development.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.
  25 in total

1.  Prognostic Impact of Tumor Cell Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Cell Infiltration in NSCLC.

Authors:  Karolina Edlund; Katrin Madjar; Johanna S M Mattsson; Dijana Djureinovic; Cecilia Lindskog; Hans Brunnström; Hirsh Koyi; Eva Brandén; Karin Jirström; Fredrik Pontén; Jörg Rahnenführer; Patrick Micke; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Glycerophospholipid profile in oncogene-induced senescence.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas; Sonja Vosbeck; Eva-Maria Hein; Birte Hellwig; Alice Langer; Heiko Hayen; Dennis Franckenstein; Bettina Büttner; Seddik Hammad; Rosemarie Marchan; Matthias Hermes; Silvia Selinski; Jörg Rahnenführer; Begüm Peksel; Zsolt Török; László Vígh; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-12-10

3.  Phospholipid metabolism in cancer cells monitored by 31P NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  P F Daly; R C Lyon; P J Faustino; J S Cohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Choline as a biomarker for cell proliferation: do the results from proton MR spectroscopy show difference between HER2/neu positive and negative breast cancers?

Authors:  Hyeon-Man Baek; Jeon-Hor Chen; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase EDI3 drives tumor cell migration and metastasis.

Authors:  Joanna D Stewart; Rosemarie Marchan; Michaela S Lesjak; Joerg Lambert; Roland Hergenroeder; James K Ellis; Chung-Ho Lau; Hector C Keun; Gerd Schmitz; Juergen Schiller; Mandy Eibisch; Christian Hedberg; Herbert Waldmann; Ekkehart Lausch; Berno Tanner; Jalid Sehouli; Jens Sagemueller; Hagen Staude; Eric Steiner; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase EDI3 links the tumor metabolome to signaling network activities.

Authors:  Rosemarie Marchan; Michaela S Lesjak; Joanna D Stewart; Roland Winter; Janine Seeliger; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  LIPG-promoted lipid storage mediates adaptation to oxidative stress in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas; Sonja Vosbeck; Karolina Edlund; Katharina Grgas; Katrin Madjar; Birte Hellwig; Alshaimaa Adawy; Annika Glotzbach; Joanna D Stewart; Michaela S Lesjak; Dennis Franckenstein; Maren Claus; Heiko Hayen; Alexander Schriewer; Kathrin Gianmoena; Sonja Thaler; Marcus Schmidt; Patrick Micke; Fredrik Pontén; Adil Mardinoglu; Cheng Zhang; Heiko U Käfferlein; Carsten Watzl; Saša Frank; Jörg Rahnenführer; Rosemarie Marchan; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas; Leonie van de Sandt; Karolina Edlund; Miriam Lohr; Birte Hellwig; Rosemarie Marchan; Marcus Schmidt; Jörg Rahnenführer; Henrik Oster; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Prognostic impact of CD4-positive T cell subsets in early breast cancer: a study based on the FinHer trial patient population.

Authors:  Marcus Schmidt; Veronika Weyer-Elberich; Jan G Hengstler; Anne-Sophie Heimes; Katrin Almstedt; Aslihan Gerhold-Ay; Antje Lebrecht; Marco J Battista; Annette Hasenburg; Ugur Sahin; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; George Fountzilas; Ralph M Wirtz; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

1.  Metabolomic analysis of endometrial cancer by high-resolution magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Senem Arda Düz; Akın Mumcu; Berat Doğan; Ercan Yılmaz; Ebru İnci Çoşkun; Erdinç Sarıdogan; Görkem Tuncay; Abdullah Karaer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Grading of endometrial cancer using 1H HR-MAS NMR-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Agnieszka Skorupa; Michał Poński; Mateusz Ciszek; Bartosz Cichoń; Mateusz Klimek; Andrzej Witek; Sławomir Pakuło; Łukasz Boguszewicz; Maria Sokół
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.