| Literature DB >> 31936880 |
Li-Xin Sheng1, Jiang-Yu Zhang1, Li Li1, Xiao Xie2, Xiao-An Wen3, Ke-Guang Cheng1.
Abstract
In order to discover novel derivatives in the anti-tumor field, reported anti-Entities:
Keywords: 2-methoxyestradiol; anti-tumor activity; intrinsic apoptosis pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936880 PMCID: PMC7023064 DOI: 10.3390/biom10010123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Chemical structures of 2-methoxyestradiol, uridine, uracil, and thymine.
Scheme 1Synthetic pathway for derivatives of etherification of 2-methoxyestradiol at 17β-OH.
Scheme 2Synthetic pathway for derivatives of etherification of 2-methoxyestradiol at 3-phenolic hydroxyl.
Evaluation of target compounds against different cell lines.
| Compounds | IC50 (μM) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 | L-O2 | |
|
| 16.68 ± 0.30 | 13.17 ± 1.09 | 35.19 ± 0.42 |
|
| 13.89 ± 0.16 | 13.97 ± 1.08 | >100 |
|
| 11.25 ± 0.46 | 13.03 ± 0.38 | 69.34 ± 4.37 |
|
| 16.64 ± 1.26 | 13.29 ± 0.16 | 51.36 ± 1.47 |
|
| 9.22 ± 0.21 | 8.00 ± 0.41 | 17.52 ± 0.69 |
|
| 12.12 ± 0.45 | 19.32 ± 1.54 | 52.62 ± 1.82 |
|
| >100 | >100 | No b |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| 6.21 ± 0.37 | 3.89 ± 0.36 | 21.26 ± 0.66 |
|
| 7.87 ± 0.42 | 10.44 ± 0.07 | 32.83 ± 0.65 |
|
| 17.92 ± 0.22 | 13.96 ± 1.69 | 38.51 ± 1.87 |
|
| 9.97 ± 0.39 | 7.34 ± 0.56 | 28.16 ± 0.57 |
|
| 10.26 ± 0.37 | 9.58 ± 0.98 | 25.86 ± 1.82 |
|
| 8.75 ± 0.22 | 12.73 ± 0.22 | 25.48 ± 1.86 |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| 28.38 ± 1.76 | 23.76 ± 1.45 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| >100 | >100 | No |
|
| 1.51 ± 0.04 | 1.86 ± 0.02 | 4.70 ± 0.45 |
|
| 8.87 ± 0.59 | 61.87 ± 2.23 | >100 |
a IC50 values are presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) from three separated experiments. b No inhibition detected.
Figure 2Morphological observation of MCF-7 cells stained by Hoechst 33258, treated by compound 11/12a for 72 h in three separated experiments, respectively.
Figure 3Changes in mitochondrial membrane potential caused by compound 11/12a on MCF-7 cells. Incubation with different concentrations of 11/12a in MCF-7 cells for 72 h prior to staining with JC-1 dye; the number of cells with collapsed mitochondrial membrane potentials was determined by flow cytometry.
Figure 4Inhibition of cell cycle progress on MCF-7 cells treated with compound 11/12a for 72 h. Cells were fixed with ethanol and stained with propidium iodide. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by a flow cytometry.
Figure 5Apoptosis ratio detection by Annexin V-APC/7-AAD double staining assay, analyzed by a flow cytometry on MCF-7 cells treated with compound 11/12a for 72 h, respectively. The UL area represents damaged cells appearing in the process of cell collection, the UR area represents necrotic cells and later period apoptotic cells, the LR area represents early apoptotic cells, and normal cells are located in the LL area.
Figure 6Immunohistochemistry of ERα in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with compound 11/12a at different concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μM), respectively, and a group without treatment as the control. (A) The observed phenomenon with the treatment of compound 11 and 12a in MCF-7 cells. (B) The IOD value detected in the treated MCF-7 cells.
Figure 7mRNA expressions of Apaf-1 (A), Bax (B), Bcl-2 (C), Bcl-Xl (D) caspase-3 (E), caspase-8 (F), caspase-9 (G), and cytochrome c (H) by RT-PCR in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with compound 11/12a at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 μM, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control.
Figure 8The protein expressions of Apaf-1, Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, and cytochrome c in MCF-7 cells treated with compounds 11/12a in western blotting assay. Cells were treated with various concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 µM) of 11/12a for 72 h.
Comparison of predicted pIC50 by 3D QSAR with experimental values.
| Compounds | IC50 (μM) a for MCF-7 | pIC50 b for MCF-7 | Predicted pIC50 c |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16.68 ± 0.30 | 4.78 | 4.84 |
|
| 13.89 ± 0.16 | 4.86 | 4.72 |
|
| 11.25 ± 0.46 | 4.95 | 5.43 |
|
| 16.64 ± 1.26 | 4.78 | 5.98 |
|
| 9.22 ± 0.21 | 5.04 | 5.96 |
|
| 12.12 ± 0.45 | 4.92 | 4.51 |
|
| >100 | <4 | 1.94 |
|
| >100 | <4 | 1.58 |
|
| >100 | <4 | −1.71 |
|
| >100 | <4 | 1.64 |
|
| 6.21 ± 0.37 | 5.21 | 6.16 |
|
| 7.87 ± 0.42 | 5.10 | 5.79 |
|
| 17.92 ± 0.22 | 4.75 | 4.78 |
|
| 9.97 ± 0.39 | 5.00 | 6.04 |
|
| 10.26 ± 0.37 | 4.99 | 5.65 |
|
| 8.75 ± 0.22 | 5.06 | 4.74 |
|
| >100 | <4 | 3.91 |
|
| 28.38 ± 1.76 | 4.55 | −0.80 |
|
| >100 | <4 | −1.05 |
|
| >100 | <4 | −0.07 |
|
| 1.51 ± 0.04 | 5.82 | 7.10 |
a IC50 values are presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) from three separated experiments. b pIC50 = −log(IC50). c Predicted pIC50 is calculated by the leave-one-out cross validation method (Surflex-quansa).
Figure 9Alignment of molecules (line) and pocket-field (50% transparent stick). The pocket-field: sticks colored purple—coulombic response; green—steric; red—acceptor; blue—donor constructed by using ligand structure and MCF-7 activity information. Image generated by pymol [43].