| Literature DB >> 31936826 |
Richard Oruko Ongon'g1, Joshua N Edokpayi2, Titus A M Msagati3, Nikita T Tavengwa4, Grace N Ijoma5, John O Odiyo2.
Abstract
This study reports on the assessment of the growth potential of five edible vegetables, which were grown in Cr(VI) spiked soils. The vegetable plants that were used in this study were Vigna angularis, Cicer arietinum, Spinacia oleracea, Amaranthus dubius Thell and Phaseolus vulgaris. Dried ground samples from roots, stems and leaves were analysed for various oxidation states of Cr. The daily intake of chromium, hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) methods were employed to assess the potential human health risks posed by these Cr oxidation states through vegetable consumption. The results showed that Vigna angularis was the only vegetable that germinated in highly concentrated Cr(VI) in the simulated soil (456 mg/kg). The highest total chromium (ChT) bioaccumulated in the roots was found in Phaseolus vulgaris at 0.8. The highest ChT translocation factor in the stem was that of Cicer arietinum and Vigna angularis at 0.30. The same plants translocated the highest ChT to the leaf at 0.7. A child or an adult consuming such contaminated Cicer arietinum vegetables were likely to take in between 508 and 785 mg/day of ChT, which are above the World Health Organisation guidelines of 220 and 340 mg/day, respectively. The highest HQ was found in Cicer arietinum at 8.7 and 13.4 for adults and children, respectively. The same species of plants also had high HI at 17.4 and 27.2 for adults and children, respectively. This indicated that consumers of the edible vegetables grown in Cr(VI) rich soils may be exposed to health risks, and the children were more likely to be vulnerable to these adverse effects than the adults.Entities:
Keywords: bioaccumulation; edible vegetables; hazard quotient; health index; speciation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936826 PMCID: PMC7013772 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Physicochemical properties of experimental soil.
| Soil Properties | Average Values |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.20 ± 0.05 |
| EC (µS/cm) | 42.80 ± 0.01 |
| Total organic carbon (%) | 0.98 ± 0.01 |
| Moisture (%) | 10.90 ± 0.15 |
| Sand (%) | 25 |
| Silt (%) | 15 |
| Clay loam (%) | 60 |
| Texture Class | Clay |
| ChT in soil (mg/kg) | 1.20 ± 0.03 |
Environmental conditions in the greenhouse.
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity (g/m3) | Humidity (g/m3) | Atmospheric Humidity (g/m3) | Dewpoint Temperature (°C) | Radiation (J/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.2 ± 4.3 | 74.8 ± 62.9 | 4.7 ± 1.5 | 10.6 ± 1.8 | 5.4 ± 3.0 | 35,274 ± 433 |
Figure 1Germination percentage of plants in different concentrations of Cr(VI) along the y-axis (n = 3, SD). SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2Effect of Cr(VI) concentration on different plant heights in simulated soil. (n = 3, SD). SD: standard deviation.
Figure 3(a). Spinacia oleracea grown by tannery workers near tannery chromium wastes dumpsite in South Africa. (b) Amarantha dubuis Thell growing wildly in a tannery chromium wastes dumpsite in Kenya. (c) Experimental set up and germination of edible vegetables in Cr(VI) polluted soil in the University of South Africa (UNISA) greenhouse number 6.
The occurrence of ChT, Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in root, stem and leaf of different plant species in the simulated soil. Experimental errors lower than 0.01 mg/kg have been omitted.
| Name of Plant | Portion of Plant | Chromium Oxidation States (mg/kg) | P > |t| (Tukey Effect) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChT | Control | Cr(VI) | Control | Cr(III) | Control | |||
|
| root | 2.80 ± 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | ND | 2.10 ± 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.000 |
| stem | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 1.20 ± 0.80 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | ||
| leaf | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | ND | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.2 | ||
|
| root | 3.40 ± 0.60 | 0.2 | 0.90 ± 0.04 | ND | 2.50 ± 0.60 | 0.2 | 0.000 |
| stem | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | ND | 1.10 ± 0.02 | 0.2 | ||
| leaf | 1.80 ± 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | ND | 1.60 ± 0.30 | 0.2 | ||
|
| root | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | ND | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.000 |
| stem | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| leaf | 2.1 | ND | ND | ND | 2.1 | ND | ||
|
| root | 3.50 ± 0.50 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.8 | ND | 2.90 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.000 |
| stem | 1.0 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | ||
| leaf | 2.10 ± 0.20 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | ND | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | ||
|
| root | 1.20 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.30 ± 0.03 | ND | 0.90 ± 0.03 | ND | 0.000 |
| stem | 0. 10 ± 0.02 | ND | ND | ND | 0.1 | ND | ||
| leaf | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 0. 09 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | ND | 1.00 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | ||
| Chrome simulated soil | Soil | 4.9 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 1.80 ± 0.07 | ND | 3.10 ± 0.10 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 0.000 |
ND means not detected.
The Bioaccumulation Factor (BF) and Translocation Factor (TF) of total chromium (ChT), Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the different parts of vegetable plants at the harvesting stage found between Cr oxidation states and plant species (p ˂ 0.05).
| Name of Plant | Treatment | BF | TF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Stem | Leaf | ||
|
| CrT | 0.8 | 0.05 | 0.3 |
| Cr(VI) | 0.4 | 0.01 | 0.2 | |
| Cr(III) | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.1 | |
|
| CrT | 1.0 | 0.30 | 0.7 |
| Cr(VI) | 0.5 | 0.20 | 0.3 | |
| Cr(III) | 0.5 | 0.10 | 0.4 | |
|
| CrT | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.2 |
| Cr(VI) | 0.1 | - | 0.01 | |
| Cr(III) | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.2 | |
|
| CrT | 1.0 | 0.30 | 0.7 |
| Cr(VI) | 0.4 | 0.01 | 0.4 | |
| Cr(III) | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.3 | |
|
| CrT | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.4 |
| Cr(VI) | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.3 | |
| Cr(III) | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.1 | |
Figure 4Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the relationship between the sampled plants species (vulgaris, dubuis, oleracea, angularis and arietinum) and the relationship between concentration of ChT, Cr(VI) and Cr(III) (active variables) in the stems (A) and leaves (C) of the edible vegetables (active observations) for the first two principal components obtained (PC1 and PC2).
Figure 5Daily intake of Chromium (DIC) total chromium (ChT), Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from the leaves of different vegetables from soil spiked with Cr(VI).
Hazard quotients (HQ) of ChT, Cr(VI) and Cr(III) to consumers of vegetables grown on soil spiked with Cr(VI).
| Plant Name | Total Cr | Cr(VI) | Cr(III) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | |
|
| 3.8 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 59 |
|
| 8.0 | 12.3 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 7.1 | 11 |
|
| 7.9 | 12.2 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 7.9 | 12.1 |
|
| 8.7 | 13.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 7.5 | 12 |
|
| 4.6 | 7.1 | 0.007 | 0.01 | 4.6 | 7.1 |
Hazard index (HI) of CrT, Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in vegetables grown in soil spiked with Cr(VI) for adult and child.
| HI |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | 7.6 | 16 | 15.8 | 17.4 | 9.2 |
| Child | 11.6 | 24.6 | 24.4 | 27.2 | 14 |