Literature DB >> 18675470

Modification of chromate toxicity by sulphate in duckweeds (Lemnaceae).

Klaus-J Appenroth1, Alexandra Luther, Gottfried Jetschke, Halina Gabrys.   

Abstract

Two duckweed species, Spirodela polyrhiza and Lemna minor, were used to measure the toxicity of chromate (100 microM) at three levels of sulphate (13 microM, low sulphate=LS; 410 microM, normal sulphate=NS; 10,000 microM, high sulphate=HS). Growth rates calculated on the basis of dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid content were all reduced by chromate. This inhibition was the strongest under LS conditions and the weakest under HS conditions. Thus, sulphate decreases chromate toxicity-which conforms with its influence on chromate uptake reported previously (Kaszycki, P., Gabrys, H., Appenroth, K.-J., Jaglarz, A., Sedziwy, S., Walczak, T., Koloczek, H., 2005. Exogenously applied sulphate as a tool to investigate transport and reduction of chromate in the duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 260-269). The three levels of sulphate were also applied during pre-cultivation of both species for 2 weeks and the consequences for chromate toxicity were tested thereafter. When S. polyrhiza was pre-cultivated in NS medium, the growth inhibition by chromate was approximately 80% of the control (no chromate) in the subsequently applied LS medium, and approximately 50% in HS. L. minor showed similar relationships but a lower overall chromate sensitivity. In comparison to the plants pre-treated in NS medium, those pre-treated in LS were more sensitive whereas those pre-treated in HS were less sensitive toward chromate. The present data demonstrate that chromate is taken up into cells of the two duckweed species by sulphate transporter(s). The rather weak influence of sulphate on chromate toxicity indicates that chromate binds to the transporters much stronger than sulphate. Moreover, the relative effects of sulphate on the chromate toxicity remain very similar regardless of pre-treatment. This confirms the conclusion from uptake experiments that pre-treatment with different levels of sulphate changes the number of sulphate transporters but their affinity remains unchanged. In summary, the influence of sulphate on the toxicity of chromate reflects mainly its influence on chromate uptake, with a negligible impact of other physiological processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18675470     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  9 in total

1.  Differential expression and alternative splicing of rice sulphate transporter family members regulate sulphur status during plant growth, development and stress conditions.

Authors:  Smita Kumar; Mehar Hasan Asif; Debasis Chakrabarty; Rudra Deo Tripathi; Prabodh Kumar Trivedi
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Growth and Lead Accumulation Capacity of Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza (Lemnaceae): Interactions with Nutrient Enrichment.

Authors:  Zeliha Leblebici; Ahmet Aksoy
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Toxicological effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on the growth rate, photosynthetic pigment content, and cell morphology of the duckweed Landoltia punctata.

Authors:  Cristina Moreira Lalau; Rodrigo de Almeida Mohedano; Éder C Schmidt; Zenilda L Bouzon; Luciane C Ouriques; Rodrigo W dos Santos; Cristina H da Costa; Denice S Vicentini; William Gerson Matias
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Cr(VI) reduction and physiological toxicity are impacted by resource ratio in Desulfovibrio vulgaris.

Authors:  Lauren C Franco; Sadie Steinbeisser; Grant M Zane; Judy D Wall; Matthew W Fields
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The Potential Health Risk Associated with Edible Vegetables Grown on Cr(VI) Polluted Soils.

Authors:  Richard Oruko Ongon'g; Joshua N Edokpayi; Titus A M Msagati; Nikita T Tavengwa; Grace N Ijoma; John O Odiyo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Study on chromium-binding capacity of Callitriche cophocarpa in an aquatic environment.

Authors:  Joanna Augustynowicz; Joanna Kyzioł-Komosińska; Sylwester Smoleń; Andrzej Waloszek
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Chromium distribution in shoots of macrophyte Callitriche cophocarpa Sendtn.

Authors:  Joanna Augustynowicz; Paweł Wróbel; Bartosz J Płachno; Grzegorz Tylko; Zbigniew Gajewski; Dariusz Węgrzynek
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 8.  Chromium Bioaccumulation and Its Impacts on Plants: An Overview.

Authors:  Anket Sharma; Dhriti Kapoor; Junfeng Wang; Babar Shahzad; Vinod Kumar; Aditi Shreeya Bali; Shivam Jasrotia; Bingsong Zheng; Huwei Yuan; Daoliang Yan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13

9.  Role of Sulfate Transporters in Chromium Tolerance in Scenedesmus acutus M. (Sphaeropleales).

Authors:  Michele Ferrari; Radiana Cozza; Matteo Marieschi; Anna Torelli
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.