| Literature DB >> 31935845 |
Anil Kumar1, Donna R Cousins2, Cheng-Wu Liu2, Ping Xu3, Jeremy D Murray1,2.
Abstract
Most legumes can engage in symbiosis with N-fixing bacteria called rhizobia. This symbiosis, called nodulation, evolved from the more widespread symbiosis that most land plants form with arbuscular mycorrhiza, which is reflected in a common requirement of certain genes for both these symbioses. One key nodulation gene, Nodule Inception (NIN), has been intensively studied. Mutants in NIN are unable to form nodules, which has made it difficult to identify downstream genes under the control of NIN. The analysis of data from our recent transcriptomics study revealed that some genes with an altered expression of nin during nodulation are upregulated in mycorrhizal roots. In addition, another study reported the decreased colonization of nin roots by arbuscular mycorrhiza. We therefore investigated a role for NIN in mycorrhiza formation. Our time course study, using two nin alleles with differing genetic backgrounds, suggests that that loss of NIN does not affect colonization of Medicago truncatula roots, either in the presence or absence of rhizobia. This, and recent phylogenetic analyses showing that the loss of NIN is correlated with loss of nodulation in the FaFaCuRo clade, but not with the ability to form mycorrhiza, argue against NIN being required for arbuscular mycorrhization in legumes.Entities:
Keywords: Rhizophagus irregularis; Sinorhizobium meliloti; common symbiosis genes
Year: 2020 PMID: 31935845 PMCID: PMC7020461 DOI: 10.3390/plants9010071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1AM phenotype of nin mutants with and without addition of rhizobia. (a) M. truncatula plants were inoculated with R. irregularis (10% chive root inoculum) and S. meliloti Rm1021 or (b) with R. irregularis only. The percentage of arbuscules in plants was determined at 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks post inoculation (wpi). A17 is the WT background for nin-1, and nin-2 is in the R108 background. Bars represent the standard error of the mean. Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the indicated means (Student’s t-test, * p < 0.05).
Figure 2Expression of Nodule Inception (NIN) during AM symbiosis and nodulation. Quantification of NIN expression (a) using publicly available transcriptome data (microarray). Raw data were retrieved from the Medicago truncatula Gene Expression Atlas [32] and the Lotus japonicus Gene Expression Atlas [33]. Data from three independent experiments are shown. The chart on the left shows NIN expression in different cell types of M. truncatula, collected using laser capture microdissection (LCM) 3 weeks after inoculation with R. irregularis. Data are from Gaude et al. [34]. In Gomez et al. [35] chart, NIN expression in 6-week-old M. truncatula uninoculated and R. irregularis inoculated roots is shown. Guether et al. [36] data represent NIN expression in uninoculated and Gigaspora margarita inoculated roots of Lotus japonicus at two different time points 4- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi). COR-cortical cells of non-mycorrhizal roots, ARB-arbuscule-containing cells and NAC-non-colonized cortical cells of mycorrhizal roots. Error bars represent standard error of the mean; (b) Quantification of NIN expression using publicly available transcriptome data (RNAseq). Raw data were retrieved from M. truncatula Small Secreted Peptide Database [39]. The expression of NIN and RAM1 at different time points post inoculation with R. irregularis along with their respective mock inoculated controls was compared; data are from Luginbuehl et al. [38]. The expression of NIN and RAM1 at varying developmental stages of nodulation was compared; data are from de Bang et al. [37]. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.