Steven S Coughlin1,2, Lee S Caplan3, Rebecca Stone4. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. scoughlin@augusta.edu. 2. Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta, GA, USA. scoughlin@augusta.edu. 3. Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta, GA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A growing amount of research has successfully incorporated Fitbit devices and other wearable activity trackers into technology-oriented lifestyle interventions to increase physical activity among cancer survivors. METHODS: The present review of this literature is based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and CINAHL and relevant search terms. Articles published in English from January 1, 2009, through October 16, 2019, were considered. RESULTS: A total of 1726 article citations were identified in PubMed and non-duplicates in CINAHL. After screening the abstracts or full texts of these articles and reviewing the references of previous review articles, we found 13 studies that met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 8 were randomized controlled trials, one was a pre-post-test trial, and 4 were qualitative studies (focus groups, in-depth interviews). The studies focused on breast cancer (n = 8), prostate cancer (n = 2), and colorectal cancer (n = 1), and the remainder focused on more than one cancer site. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of consumer wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight management among cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors show an increase in physical activity when using consumer wearable activity trackers. Increased physical activity plays an important role in alleviating many adverse effects of breast cancer therapy as well as improving morbidity and mortality. Additional research such as clinical trials focused on the development of successful interventions utilizing these devices is warranted.
PURPOSE: A growing amount of research has successfully incorporated Fitbit devices and other wearable activity trackers into technology-oriented lifestyle interventions to increase physical activity among cancer survivors. METHODS: The present review of this literature is based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and CINAHL and relevant search terms. Articles published in English from January 1, 2009, through October 16, 2019, were considered. RESULTS: A total of 1726 article citations were identified in PubMed and non-duplicates in CINAHL. After screening the abstracts or full texts of these articles and reviewing the references of previous review articles, we found 13 studies that met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 8 were randomized controlled trials, one was a pre-post-test trial, and 4 were qualitative studies (focus groups, in-depth interviews). The studies focused on breast cancer (n = 8), prostate cancer (n = 2), and colorectal cancer (n = 1), and the remainder focused on more than one cancer site. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of consumer wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight management among cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors show an increase in physical activity when using consumer wearable activity trackers. Increased physical activity plays an important role in alleviating many adverse effects of breast cancer therapy as well as improving morbidity and mortality. Additional research such as clinical trials focused on the development of successful interventions utilizing these devices is warranted.
Authors: Savitha Sangameswaran; Courtney Segal; Dori E Rosenberg; Reggie Casanova-Perez; David Cronkite; John L Gore; Andrea L Hartzler Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Frank J Penedo; Linda M Collins; Payton Solk; Juned Siddique; Jing Song; David Cella; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald T Ackermann; Whitney A Welch; Lisa A Auster-Gussman; Madelyn Whitaker; Erin Cullather; Emily Izenman; Bonnie Spring Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: David J Finley; Courtney J Stevens; Jennifer A Emond; John A Batsis; Kayla A Fay; Christian Darabos; Olivia A Sacks; Summer B Cook; Kathleen Doyle Lyons Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Erin L Van Blarigan; Anand Dhruva; Chloe E Atreya; Stacey A Kenfield; June M Chan; Alexandra Milloy; Iris Kim; Paige Steiding; Angela Laffan; Li Zhang; Sorbarikor Piawah; Yoshimi Fukuoka; Christine Miaskowski; Frederick M Hecht; Mi-Ok Kim; Alan P Venook; Katherine Van Loon Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-01-11
Authors: Selina Khoo; Najihah Mohbin; Payam Ansari; Mahfoodha Al-Kitani; Andre Matthias Müller Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tamar Ginossar; Heidi Rishel Brakey; Andrew L Sussman; Brittany Price; Miria Kano; Sally Davis; Cindy K Blair Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.390