Literature DB >> 31932612

Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality.

Anthony R Harding1,2, Katharine Ricke3,4, Daniel Heyen5, Douglas G MacMartin6, Juan Moreno-Cruz7.   

Abstract

Exploring heterogeneity in the economic impacts of solar geoengineering is a fundamental step towards understanding the risk tradeoff associated with a geoengineering option. To evaluate impacts of solar geoengineering and greenhouse gas-driven climate change on equal terms, we apply macroeconomic impact models that have been widely applied to climate change impacts assessment. Combining historical evidence with climate simulations of mean annual temperature and precipitation, we project socio-economic outcomes under high anthropogenic emissions for stylized climate scenarios in which global temperatures are stabilized or over-cooled by blocking solar radiation. We find impacts of climate changes on global GDP-per-capita by the end of the century are temperature-driven, highly dispersed, and model dependent. Across all model specifications, however, income inequality between countries is lower with solar geoengineering. Consistent reduction in inter-country inequality can inform discussions of the distribution of impacts of solar geoengineering, a topic of concern in geoengineering ethics and governance debates.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31932612      PMCID: PMC6957473          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  7 in total

1.  Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production.

Authors:  Marshall Burke; Solomon M Hsiang; Edward Miguel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle.

Authors:  G Bala; P B Duffy; K E Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change.

Authors:  Wolfram Schlenker; Michael J Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.

Authors:  Richard H Moss; Jae A Edmonds; Kathy A Hibbard; Martin R Manning; Steven K Rose; Detlef P van Vuuren; Timothy R Carter; Seita Emori; Mikiko Kainuma; Tom Kram; Gerald A Meehl; John F B Mitchell; Nebojsa Nakicenovic; Keywan Riahi; Steven J Smith; Ronald J Stouffer; Allison M Thomson; John P Weyant; Thomas J Wilbanks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets.

Authors:  Marshall Burke; W Matthew Davis; Noah S Diffenbaugh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions.

Authors:  Jonathan Proctor; Solomon Hsiang; Jennifer Burney; Marshall Burke; Wolfram Schlenker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Social and economic impacts of climate.

Authors:  Tamma A Carleton; Solomon M Hsiang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification.

Authors:  D G MacMartin; D Visioni; B Kravitz; J H Richter; T Felgenhauer; W R Lee; D R Morrow; E A Parson; M Sugiyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.