Literature DB >> 30089909

Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions.

Jonathan Proctor1,2, Solomon Hsiang3,4, Jennifer Burney5, Marshall Burke4,6, Wolfram Schlenker4,7.   

Abstract

Solar radiation management is increasingly considered to be an option for managing global temperatures1,2, yet the economic effects of ameliorating climatic changes by scattering sunlight back to space remain largely unknown3. Although solar radiation management may increase crop yields by reducing heat stress4, the effects of concomitant changes in available sunlight have never been empirically estimated. Here we use the volcanic eruptions that inspired modern solar radiation management proposals as natural experiments to provide the first estimates, to our knowledge, of how the stratospheric sulfate aerosols created by the eruptions of El Chichón and Mount Pinatubo altered the quantity and quality of global sunlight, and how these changes in sunlight affected global crop yields. We find that the sunlight-mediated effect of stratospheric sulfate aerosols on yields is negative for both C4 (maize) and C3 (soy, rice and wheat) crops. Applying our yield model to a solar radiation management scenario based on stratospheric sulfate aerosols, we find that projected mid-twenty-first century damages due to scattering sunlight caused by solar radiation management are roughly equal in magnitude to benefits from cooling. This suggests that solar radiation management-if deployed using stratospheric sulfate aerosols similar to those emitted by the volcanic eruptions it seeks to mimic-would, on net, attenuate little of the global agricultural damage from climate change. Our approach could be extended to study the effects of solar radiation management on other global systems, such as human health or ecosystem function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30089909     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0417-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  7 in total

1.  Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty.

Authors:  Anna Lou Abatayo; Valentina Bosetti; Marco Casari; Riccardo Ghidoni; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Globally ubiquitous negative effects of nitrogen dioxide on crop growth.

Authors:  David B Lobell; Stefania Di Tommaso; Jennifer A Burney
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality.

Authors:  Anthony R Harding; Katharine Ricke; Daniel Heyen; Douglas G MacMartin; Juan Moreno-Cruz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Solar geoengineering could redistribute malaria risk in developing countries.

Authors:  Colin J Carlson; Rita Colwell; Mohammad Sharif Hossain; Mohammed Mofizur Rahman; Alan Robock; Sadie J Ryan; Mohammad Shafiul Alam; Christopher H Trisos
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Geographically resolved social cost of anthropogenic emissions accounting for both direct and climate-mediated effects.

Authors:  Jennifer Burney; Geeta Persad; Jonathan Proctor; Eran Bendavid; Marshall Burke; Sam Heft-Neal
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 14.957

6.  A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security.

Authors:  Jonas Jägermeyr; Alan Robock; Joshua Elliott; Christoph Müller; Lili Xia; Nikolay Khabarov; Christian Folberth; Erwin Schmid; Wenfeng Liu; Florian Zabel; Sam S Rabin; Michael J Puma; Alison Heslin; James Franke; Ian Foster; Senthold Asseng; Charles G Bardeen; Owen B Toon; Cynthia Rosenzweig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  How will air quality effects on human health, crops and ecosystems change in the future?

Authors:  Erika von Schneidemesser; Charles Driscoll; Harald E Rieder; Luke D Schiferl
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.