BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) occur in up to 13% of patients with colorectal cancer, presenting either synchronously or metachronously. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) have been increasingly utilised for selected CPM patients with favourable outcomes, though its benefits may differ for synchronous (s-CPM) and metachronous CPM (m-CPM). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CPM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore over 15 years was performed. In the s-CPM group, CPM was diagnosed at primary presentation with CRS and HIPEC performed at the time of or within 6 months from primary surgery. In the m-CPM group, patients developed CPM > 6 months after primary curative surgery. RESULTS: One hundred two patients with CPM were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Twenty (19.6%) patients had s-CPM and 82 (80.4%) had m-CPM. Recurrences occurred in 45% of s-CPM and in 54% of m-CPM (p = 0.619). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged in patients with m-CPM (45.2 versus 26.9 months, p = 0.025). In a subset of m-CPM patients with limited PCI in whom ICU stay was not required, a survival advantage was seen (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A survival advantage was seen a subset of m-CPM patients, possibly representing differences in disease biology.
BACKGROUND:Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) occur in up to 13% of patients with colorectal cancer, presenting either synchronously or metachronously. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) have been increasingly utilised for selected CPMpatients with favourable outcomes, though its benefits may differ for synchronous (s-CPM) and metachronous CPM (m-CPM). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CPMpatients treated with CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore over 15 years was performed. In the s-CPM group, CPM was diagnosed at primary presentation with CRS and HIPEC performed at the time of or within 6 months from primary surgery. In the m-CPM group, patients developed CPM > 6 months after primary curative surgery. RESULTS: One hundred two patients with CPM were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Twenty (19.6%) patients had s-CPM and 82 (80.4%) had m-CPM. Recurrences occurred in 45% of s-CPM and in 54% of m-CPM (p = 0.619). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged in patients with m-CPM (45.2 versus 26.9 months, p = 0.025). In a subset of m-CPMpatients with limited PCI in whom ICU stay was not required, a survival advantage was seen (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A survival advantage was seen a subset of m-CPMpatients, possibly representing differences in disease biology.
Authors: Michael Flood; Vignesh Narasimhan; Kasmira Wilson; Wei Mou Lim; Robert Ramsay; Michael Michael; Alexander Heriot Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michelle V Dietz; Job P van Kooten; Ibrahim Said; Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof; Cornelis Verhoef; Andreas J A Bremers; Johannes H W de Wilt; Philip R de Reuver; Eva V E Madsen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: C Bakkers; R J Lurvink; A Rijken; S W Nienhuijs; N F Kok; G J Creemers; C Verhoef; V E Lemmens; F N van Erning; I H De Hingh Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 5.344