| Literature DB >> 31930772 |
Shih-Wei Yang1,2, Yun-Shien Lee3,4, Liang-Che Chang2,5, Cheng-Cheng Hwang2,5, Tai-An Chen1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older age is one of the factors associated with malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia (OL). The purpose of this study is to analyze the clincopathological features and treatment outcomes of OL in the elderly patients.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; laser; malignant transformation; oral leukoplakia; recurrence
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31930772 PMCID: PMC7216872 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Head Neck ISSN: 1043-3074 Impact factor: 3.147
Figure 1Algorithm for identifying the study cohorts
Clincopathological characteristics of elderly patients with oral cavity leukoplakia (n = 69)
| Characteristics | Case no. | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | ||
| Mean (SD): 71.2 (4.9) | ||
| Median (range): 71.0 (65‐83) | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||
| Mean (SD): 24.4 (3.2) | ||
| Gender | ||
| Female | 16 | 23.2 |
| Male | 53 | 76.8 |
| History of head and neck cancer | ||
| No | 49 | 71.0 |
| Yes | 20 | 29.0 |
| History of radiation therapy | ||
| No | 58 | 84.1 |
| Yes | 11 | 15.9 |
| Cigarette smoking | ||
| No | 28 | 40.6 |
| Ex‐smoker | 22 | 31.9 |
| Yes | 19 | 27.5 |
| Alcohol drinking | ||
| No | 53 | 76.8 |
| Ex‐drinker | 10 | 14.5 |
| Yes | 6 | 8.7 |
| Betel quid chewing | ||
| No | 51 | 73.9 |
| Ex‐chewer | 18 | 26.1 |
| Yes | 0 | 0.0 |
| Candida infection | ||
| No | 62 | 89.9 |
| Yes | 7 | 10.1 |
| Diabetes mellitus | ||
| No | 52 | 75.4 |
| Yes | 17 | 24.6 |
| Metformin taken | ||
| No | 58 | 84.1 |
| Yes | 11 | 15.9 |
| Multi‐focus sites | ||
| No | 56 | 81.2 |
| Yes | 13 | 18.8 |
| Location of leukoplakia | ||
| Buccal | 54 | 64.3 |
| Tongue | 12 | 14.3 |
| Gum | 5 | 6.0 |
| Labial | 4 | 4.8 |
| Mouth floor | 1 | 1.2 |
| Hard palate | 1 | 1.2 |
| Retromolar | 7 | 8.3 |
| Morphology | ||
| Homogeneous | 42 | 50.0 |
| Nonhomogeneous | 42 | 50.0 |
| Pathology | ||
| Squamous hyperplasia | 15 | 21.7 |
| Mild dysplasia | 34 | 49.3 |
| Moderate dysplasia | 12 | 17.4 |
| Severe dysplasia/carcinoma in situ | 8 | 11.6 |
| Postoperative recurrence | ||
| No | 46 | 66.7 |
| Yes | 23 | 33.3 |
| Follow‐up duration (mo) | ||
| Mean (SD): 42.5 (35.2) | ||
| Median (range): 29.0 (3.2‐145.1) | ||
| Total area of leukoplakia (cm2) | ||
| Mean (SD): 2.3 (1.9) | ||
| Median (range): 1.8 (0.1‐10.6) | ||
| Malignant transformation | ||
| No | 61 | 88.4 |
| Yes | 8 | 11.6 |
One missing data in body mass index (n = 68).
Thirteen out of 69 patients had multiple sites of oral leukoplakia, so the number of total lesions was 84.
The topographic sites, pathology, and treatment outcomes of different subsites (n = 84) of oral leukoplakia treated by carbon dioxide laser in the 69 elderly patients
| Buccal | Retromolar | Gum | Labial | Hard palate | Mouth floor | Tongue | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The number of lesions | 54 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 84 |
| Morphology | ||||||||
| Homogeneous | 26 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 42 |
| Non‐homogeneous | 28 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 42 |
| Speckled type | 19 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 31 |
| Nodular type | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Verruciform type | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Pathology | ||||||||
| Squamous hyperplasia | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
| Mild dysplasia | 25 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 39 |
| Moderate dysplasia | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 |
| Severe dysplasia/carcinoma in situ | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Postoperative recurrence | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 26 |
| Malignant transformation | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
There were two patients with more than one site of postoperative recurrence, so the number of recurrent lesions were 26 but the patients with postoperative recurrence were 23.
Univariate analysis of the factors related to postoperative recurrence in the elderly patients who underwent surgical excision for oral leukoplakia
| Case no. (n = 69) | Postoperative recurrence | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No (n = 46) | Yes (n = 23) | |||||
| Gender | .77 | |||||
| Female | 16 | 10 | 6 | 1.0 | ||
| Male | 53 | 36 | 17 | 0.79 | .025‐2.52 | |
| Age | 69 | 71.8 ± 5.3 | 70.2 ± 3.9 | 1.60 | 0.83‐1.04 | .20 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 69 | 24.3 ± 3.1 | 24.5 ± 3.5 | 1.01 | 0.87‐1.19 | .86 |
| History of head and neck cancer | .59 | |||||
| No | 46 | 32 | 14 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 23 | 14 | 9 | 1.47 | 0.52‐4.19 | |
| History of radiation therapy | .16 | |||||
| No | 58 | 41 | 17 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 11 | 5 | 6 | 2.89 | 0.78‐10.78 | |
| Cigarette smoking | .76 | |||||
| Non‐smoker | 28 | 20 | 8 | 1.0 | ||
| Ex‐smoker | 22 | 15 | 7 | 1.17 | 0.35‐3.93 | |
| Current smoker | 19 | 11 | 8 | 1.82 | 0.53‐6.19 | |
| Alcohol drinking | .52 | |||||
| Non‐drinker | 53 | 35 | 18 | 1.0 | ||
| Ex‐drinker | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0.83 | 0.19‐3.61 | |
| Current drinker | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.97 | 0.16‐5.82 | |
| Betel quid chewing | .09 | |||||
| Non‐chewer | 51 | 37 | 14 | 1.0 | ||
| Ex‐chewer | 18 | 9 | 9 | 2.64 | 0.87‐8.02 | |
| Current chewer | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| Candida infection | .68 | |||||
| No | 62 | 42 | 20 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1.57 | 0.32‐7.71 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.0 | |||||
| No | 52 | 35 | 17 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 17 | 11 | 6 | 1.12 | 0.35‐3.55 | |
| Metformin taken | .31 | |||||
| No | 58 | 37 | 21 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0.39 | 0.077‐1.98 | |
| Multifocal disease | .75 | |||||
| No (single lesion) | 56 | 38 | 18 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes (multiple lesions) | 13 | 8 | 5 | 1.32 | 0.38‐4.61 | |
| Locations of leukoplakia | .82 | |||||
| Buccal and other keratinized mucosa | 71 | 48 | 23 | 1.0 | ||
| Tongue and floor of the mouth | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0.88 | 0.35‐2.17 | |
| Morphology | .005 | |||||
| Homogeneous | 32 | 27 | 5 | 1.0 | ||
| Non‐homogeneous | 37 | 19 | 18 | 5.12 | 1.62–16.18 | |
| Pathology | .02 | |||||
| Squamous hyperplasia | 15 | 13 | 2 | 1.0 | ||
| Mild dysplasia | 34 | 24 | 10 | 2.71 | 0.51‐14.27 | |
| Moderate dysplasia | 12 | 7 | 5 | 4.64 | 0.71‐30.42 | |
| Severe dysplasia/Carcinoma in situ | 8 | 2 | 6 | 19.50 | 2.2‐173.49 | |
| Total area of leukoplakia (cm2) | 69 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 2.3 | 1.91 | 1.32–2.76 | <.001 |
One missing data in the group of patients with postoperative recurrence (n = 22).
Thirteen out of 69 patients had multiple foci of oral leukoplakia, so the number of total lesions was 84.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with recurrence of oral leukoplakia in the elderly patients
| Variables | β | SE (β) | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morphology | 0.87 | 0.76 | 2.4 (0.54‐10.52) | .25 |
| Pathology | 0.92 | 0.42 | 2.52 (1.11–5.74) | .028 |
| Total area of leukoplakia (cm2) | 0.74 | 0.23 | 2.1 (1.33‐3.29) | .0013 |
Note: Adjusted for age and sex.
Figure 2The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to predict postoperative recurrence. Each point on the ROC corresponds to a value on the area of oral leukoplakia. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.775. The straight dashed line represents the ROC curve expected by chance only
Comparison of oral habits in studies on oral leukoplakia conducted in Taiwan, a betel quid chewing endemic region
| Author(s) | Location | Date | Case no. (n) | Age | Male/female | Ever alcohol drinking (%) | Ever cigarette smoking (%) | Ever betel quid chewing (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee et al | Taiwan | 2003 | 125 | 47.9 ± 11.8 | 118/7 | 42.4% (53/125) | 84.8% (106/125) | 77.6% (97/125) |
| Shiu et al | Taiwan | 2004 | 164 | 46 ± 14 | 146/18 | 17.07% (28/164) | 76.22% (125/164) | 60.37% (99/164) |
| Lee et al | Taiwan | 2006 | 1046 | 50.0 ± 12.1 | 956/90 | 35.37% (370/1064) | 80.78% (845/1064) | 75.9% (794/1064) |
| Yang et al | Taiwan | 2010 | 114 | 49.7 ± 12.2 | 90/24 | 31.58% (36/114) | 76.32% (87/114) | 57.89% (66/124) |
| Chuang et al | Taiwan | 2018 | 5142 | 47 | 5142/0 | 62.8% (3231/5142) | 94.1% (4838/5142) | 81.8% (4205/5142) |
| Present study | Taiwan | 69 | 71.22 ± 4.89 (all >65) | 53/16 | 23.19% (16/69) | 59.42% (41/69) | 26.09% (18/69) |
Ex‐users and current users were both included.
Female patients were excluded in the study.
P < .001, statistical comparison between the present study and the five published reports.