Literature DB >> 31930031

The vulnerable point of modified blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula learned from 50 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Sung Geun Kim1, Kwang Yeol Paik1, Ji Seon Oh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blumgart anastomosis (BA) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) had reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after PD in literatures. The aim of this study is to report surgical results from a consecutive series of operation using the modified BA method.
METHODS: Data from 50 consecutive patients who underwent PD using modified BA between September 2011 and August 2018 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, regarding POPF, other morbidities, and mortality.
RESULTS: Overall incidence of POPF was 10.0%, the rate of grade B POPF was 8.0% (4/50) and grade C was 2.0% (1/50). Among 50 patients, 5 post pancreatectomy hemorrhages (PPHs) (10.0%) including 2 POPF related bleeding, and 4 abscesses including 2 related to POPF occurred. Fistula risk grades were as follows: 0 negligible, 6 low, 36 intermediate, and 8 high. Except for one patient, fistulas improved over the clinical course after radiologic intervention drainage and angiography. The mortality occurred due to POPF followed by jejunal detachment from the remnant pancreas stump. In this case, jejunum was too thin, compared to the pancreatic thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective single-center result demonstrated that the modified BA had an acceptable rate of POPF. Modified BA may be risky and potentially provoke fatal POPF, when joining a thin jejunum and thick pancreas. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blumgart anastomosis (BA); pancreaticoduodenectomy; postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF); vulnerable

Year:  2019        PMID: 31930031      PMCID: PMC6944611          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  10 in total

1.  Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  A Kleespies; M Rentsch; H Seeliger; M Albertsmeier; K-W Jauch; C J Bruns
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kakita; T Takahashi; M Yoshida; K Furuta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches.

Authors:  Christopher R Shubert; Amy E Wagie; Michael B Farnell; David M Nagorney; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid Lombardo; Mark J Truty; Rory L Smoot; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Suguru Yamada; Mitsuro Kanda; Masaya Suenaga; Hideki Takami; Masashi Hattori; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure.

Authors:  Tatsuya Oda; Shinji Hashimoto; Ryoichi Miyamoto; Osamu Shimomura; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Keisuke Kohno; Yukio Ohshiro; Yoshimasa Akashi; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Shin-E Wang; Shih-Chin Chen; Bor-Uei Shyr; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  The effect of modified pancreaticojejunostomy for reducing the pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dong Jin Kim; Kwang Yeol Paik; Wook Kim; Eung Kook Kim
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

8.  Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications.

Authors:  Stephen R Grobmyer; David Kooby; Leslie H Blumgart; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Mark P Callery; Wande B Pratt; Tara S Kent; Elliot L Chaikof; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Modified Blumgart Mattress Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Pancreaticojejunostomy During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Yuji Kitahata; Shinya Hayami; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Oğuzhan Özşay; Mehmet Can Aydın
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.555

2.  Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: does it reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula in comparison to other pancreatic anastomoses?

Authors:  Marcello Di Martino; Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez; Elena Martín-Pérez
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy-does surgical technique matter?

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

4.  Implication of pancreaticoenterostomy regarding postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Kwang Yeol Paik
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-05

5.  Blumgart anastomosis reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenlu Li; Ailin Wei; Ning Xia; Liangxia Zheng; Dujiang Yang; Jun Ye; Junjie Xiong; Weiming Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.