Literature DB >> 25894407

The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure.

Tatsuya Oda1, Shinji Hashimoto, Ryoichi Miyamoto, Osamu Shimomura, Kiyoshi Fukunaga, Keisuke Kohno, Yukio Ohshiro, Yoshimasa Akashi, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Nobuhiro Ohkohchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among the types of pancreatic anastomosis used after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), Blumgart type reconstruction has rapidly been distributed for its theoretical reasonableness, including secure tight adaptation of jejunal wall and pancreatic parenchyma without cause of parenchymal laceration. The clinical appropriateness of our modified Blumgart method was demonstrated by comparing to that of Kakita method.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 156 patients underwent elective open PD, reconstructed former 78 patients with the Kakita method, utilizing a full-thickness penetrating suture for tight stump adhesion. The later 78 patients were treated with the modified Blumgart method, which involved clamping the pancreatic parenchymal stump by the jejunal seromuscular layers with horizontal mattress-type penetration sutures. Evaluated variables were the rate of pancreatic fistula (PF) and the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS).
RESULTS: The rate of ISGPF grade B+C PF was 29/78 (37.2%) in the Kakita group and 16/78 (20.5%) in the Blumgart group (P=0.033). The median POHS for the Kakita group was 23 days, whereas that for the Blumgart group was 16 days (P<0.001), one of the shortest value among Japanese high-volume centers. There was no perioperative intensive hemorrhage or deaths in either group.
CONCLUSION: A unique concept of Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis, i.e., utilizing the jejunum as an interstitial cushion to prevent pancreatic laceration at the knot site, has become realistic through a simple "one step" modification. This technique, also providing flexible handling space at main pancreatic duct anastomosis, should contribute to the improved PF prevention and shortening the POHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25894407     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3075-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique.

Authors:  A Kakita; M Yoshida; T Takahashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2001

2.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Haane; Wolf Arif Mardin; Britta Schmitz; Sameer Dhayat; Richard Hummel; Norbert Senninger; Christina Schleicher; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kakita; T Takahashi; M Yoshida; K Furuta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure?

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Satoshi Hirooka; Rintaro Yui; So Yamaki; Kanji Takahashi; Yoichi Matsui; Hynek Mergental; A-Hon Kwon
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

8.  Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Shu You Peng; Jian Wei Wang; Wan Yee Lau; Xiu Jun Cai; Yi Ping Mou; Ying Bin Liu; Jiang Tao Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines.

Authors:  Swee H Teh; Brian S Diggs; Clifford W Deveney; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  Outcome of 150 Consecutive Blumgart's Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Mallika Tewari; R Mahendran; T Kiran; A Verma; V K Dixit; S Shukla; H S Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-27

2.  Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct.

Authors:  Ryoichi Miyamoto; Yukio Oshiro; Ken Nakayama; Keisuke Kohno; Shinji Hashimoto; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Tatsuya Oda; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Pancreatic juice outflow in pancreatojejunostomy monitoring with the inter-anastomosis drainage tube; a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Osamu Shimomura; Tatsuya Oda; Yoshihiro Miyazaki; Kinji Furuya; Manami Doi; Kazuhiro Takahashi; Jaejeong Kim; Shoko Moue; Yohei Owada; Koichi Ogawa; Yusuke Ohara; Yoshimasa Akashi; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Shinji Hashimoto
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.030

4.  Three-Dimensional Remnant Pancreatic Volumetry Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Pancreatic Cancer Patients after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ryoichi Miyamoto; Yukio Oshiro; Naoki Sano; Satoshi Inagawa; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-12-12

5.  The vulnerable point of modified blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula learned from 50 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sung Geun Kim; Kwang Yeol Paik; Ji Seon Oh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

6.  Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: does it reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula in comparison to other pancreatic anastomoses?

Authors:  Marcello Di Martino; Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez; Elena Martín-Pérez
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

7.  Modified Blumgart anastomosis without pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy: a feasible and safe novel technique.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Yang Bai; Mangmang Cui; Qingxiang Zhang; Wei Zhang; Feng Fang; Tianqiang Song
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.248

8.  Comparison of pancreatojejunostomy techniques in patients with a soft pancreas: Kakita anastomosis and Blumgart anastomosis.

Authors:  Shoji Kawakatsu; Yosuke Inoue; Yoshihiro Mise; Takeaki Ishizawa; Hiromichi Ito; Yu Takahashi; Akio Saiura
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Modified Blumgart Mattress Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Pancreaticojejunostomy During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Yuji Kitahata; Shinya Hayami; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Blumgart anastomosis reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenlu Li; Ailin Wei; Ning Xia; Liangxia Zheng; Dujiang Yang; Jun Ye; Junjie Xiong; Weiming Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.