Literature DB >> 31926362

Selection of Neurological Surgery Applicants and the Value of Standardized Letters of Evaluation: A Survey of United States Program Directors.

Nicholas C Field1, Margaret M Gullick2, John W German3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The letter of recommendation (LOR) represents a nonstandardized way to evaluate residency candidates. The goal of this project was to assess the current components of the Electronic Residency Application Service application and to determine and develop support for a standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in the resident selection process.
METHODS: A 16-question survey was sent to US neurosurgery program directors. In addition to demographic information, respondents were asked to rank 7 aspects of the current application (1-7), evaluate the inclusion of specific standardized questions about applicants (yes or no), note their agreement with statements about LORs (on a 5-point Likert scale), and provide any additional comments.
RESULTS: Fifty-three of 113 program directors (47%) completed the survey. The interview (average rank, 2.0 ± 1.4), United States Medical Licensing Exam step 1 score (2.86 ± 1.4), and LOR (2.96 ± 1.5) were ranked as the most important aspects of the application. Agreement was high for items regarding the utility of the current LOR (51%-78% agreement). Almost two-thirds (65%) of program directors agreed that implementing a standardized LOR would improve the resident selection process. Inclusion of questions regarding applicants' work ethic, teamwork, communication, professionalism, and initiative were strongly supported (>80% in favor), whereas including a question on theoretical rank position was mixed (54%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most neurosurgical program directors agree that increasing the objectivity of the application would be beneficial, including the addition of standardized questions. However, there is only moderate interest in implementing an SLOE.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Letter of recommendation; Neurosurgery residency match; Standardized letter of evaluation

Year:  2020        PMID: 31926362     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  An Examination of Standardized Letters of Recommendation Rating Scales Among Neurosurgical Residency Candidates During the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.

Authors:  Michael J Feldman; Alexander V Ortiz; Steven G Roth; Robert J Dambrino; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Rohan V Chitale; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

3.  A National Survey Evaluating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Students Pursuing Careers in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Roxanna M Garcia; Rebecca A Reynolds; Hannah K Weiss; Nathan A Shlobin; Lola B Chambless; Sandi Lam; Nader S Dahdaleh; Gail Rosseau
Journal:  NeuroSci       Date:  2021-10-03

4.  Analyzing international medical graduate research productivity for application to US neurosurgery residency and beyond: A survey of applicants, program directors, and institutional experience.

Authors:  Giancarlo Mignucci-Jiménez; Yuan Xu; Lena Mary Houlihan; Dimitri Benner; Jubran H Jubran; Ann J Staudinger Knoll; Mohamed A Labib; Teodoro Forcht Dagi; Robert F Spetzler; Michael T Lawton; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.