Literature DB >> 31924084

Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes.

Steven R Leigh1, Brian T Shea2.   

Abstract

This analysis investigates the ontogeny of body size dimorphism in apes. The processes that lead to adult body size dimorphism are illustrated and described. Potential covariation between ontogenetic processes and socioecological variables is evaluated. Mixed-longitudinal growth data from 395 captive individuals (representing Hylobates lar [gibbon], Hylobates syndactylus [siamang], Pongo pygmaeus [orangutan], Gorilla gorilla [gorilla], Pan paniscus [pygmy chimpanzee], and Pan troglodytes ["common" chimpanzee]) form the basis of this study. Results illustrate heterogeneity in the growth processes that produce ape dimorphism. Hylobatids show no sexual differentiation in body weight growth. Adult body size dimorphism in Pongo can be largely attributed to indeterminate male growth. Dimorphism in African apes is produced by two different ontogenetic processes. Both pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) become dimorphic primarily through bimaturism (sex differences in duration of growth). In contrast, sex differences in rate of growth account for the majority of dimorphism in common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Diversity in the ontogenetic pathways that produce adult body size dimorphism may be related to multiple evolutionary causes of dimorphism. The lack of sex differences in hylobatid growth is consistent with a monogamous social organization. Adult dimorphism in Pongo can be attributed to sexual selection for indeterminate male growth. Interpretation of dimorphism in African apes is complicated because factors that influence female ontogeny have a substantial effect on the resultant adult dimorphism. Sexual selection for prolonged male growth in gorillas may also increase bimaturism relative to common chimpanzees. Variation in female growth is hypothesized to covary with foraging adaptations and with differences in female competition that result from these foraging adaptations. Variation in male growth probably corresponds to variation in level of sexual selection. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Copyright © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  growth and development; primates; sexual size dimorphism; socioecology

Year:  1995        PMID: 31924084     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1350360104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  12 in total

1.  Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.

Authors:  Edward Wright; Jordi Galbany; Shannon C McFarlin; Eric Ndayishimiye; Tara S Stoinski; Martha M Robbins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Greater variability in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) brain structure among males.

Authors:  Alex R DeCasien; Chet C Sherwood; Steven J Schapiro; James P Higham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Nonhuman primates at the intersection of aging biology, chronic disease, and health: An introduction to the American Journal of Primatology Special Issue on aging, cognitive decline, and neuropathology in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Carol A Shively; Agnès Lacreuse; Brett M Frye; Emily S Rothwell; Manuel Moro
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in free-ranging rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Cassandra M Turcotte; Eva H J Mann; Michala K Stock; Catalina I Villamil; Michael J Montague; Edwin Dickinson; Samuel Bauman Surratt; Melween Martinez; Scott A Williams; Susan C Antón; James P Higham
Journal:  Am J Biol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Preliminary findings of age and male sexual characteristics andand potential effect to semen characteristics and cryopreservation of the critically endangered Bornean orangutan in Malaysia.

Authors:  Zainal Zahari Zainuddin; Reza Tarmizi; Yap Keng Chee; Nur Nabila Sarkawi; Hafandi Ahmad; Annas Salleh; Nur Diyana Mohamad Tahir; Falah Baiee; Azlan Che-Amat; Wan-Nor Fitri
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Validation and utility of a body condition scoring system for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Lisa A Reamer; Sarah J Neal Webb; Rebekah Jones; Erica Thiele; Rachel L Haller; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Patrick W Hanley
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes.

Authors:  Shuhei Nozaki; Motoharu Oishi; Naomichi Ogihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Born to sing! Song development in a singing primate.

Authors:  Chiara De Gregorio; Filippo Carugati; Vittoria Estienne; Daria Valente; Teresa Raimondi; Valeria Torti; Longondraza Miaretsoa; Jonah Ratsimbazafy; Marco Gamba; Cristina Giacoma
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  The development and maintenance of sex differences in dietary breadth and complexity in Bornean orangutans.

Authors:  Caroline Schuppli; S Suci Utami Atmoko; Erin R Vogel; Carel P van Schaik; Maria A van Noordwijk
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.