Literature DB >> 32492071

Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.

Edward Wright1, Jordi Galbany2,3, Shannon C McFarlin2, Eric Ndayishimiye4, Tara S Stoinski4, Martha M Robbins1.   

Abstract

According to life history theory, natural selection has shaped trade-offs for allocating energy among growth, reproduction and maintenance to maximize individual fitness. In social mammals body size and dominance rank are two key variables believed to influence female reproductive success. However, few studies have examined these variables together, particularly in long-lived species. Previous studies found that female dominance rank correlates with reproductive success in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), which is surprising given they have weak dominance relationships and experience seemingly low levels of feeding competition. It is not currently known whether this relationship is primarily driven by a positive correlation between rank and body size. We used the non-invasive parallel laser method to measure two body size variables (back breadth and body length) of 34 wild adult female mountain gorillas, together with long-term dominance and demography data to investigate the interrelationships among body size, dominance rank and two measures of female reproductive success (inter-birth interval N = 29 and infant mortality N = 64). Using linear mixed models, we found no support for body size to be significantly correlated with dominance rank or female reproductive success. Higher-ranking females had significantly shorter inter-birth intervals than lower-ranking ones, but dominance rank was not significantly correlated with infant mortality. Our results suggest that female dominance rank is primarily determined by factors other than linear body dimensions and that high rank provides benefits even in species with weak dominance relationships and abundant year-round food resources. Future studies should focus on the mechanisms behind heterogeneity in female body size in relation to trade-offs in allocating energy to growth, maintenance and lifetime reproductive success.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32492071      PMCID: PMC7269200          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  46 in total

1.  Age-related patterns of reproductive success among female mountain gorillas.

Authors:  Andrew M Robbins; Martha M Robbins; Netzin Gerald-Steklis; H Dieter Steklis
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Phenotypic determinants of individual fitness in female fur seals: larger is better.

Authors:  Gwénaël Beauplet; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder.

Authors:  M Festa-Bianchet; J M Gaillard; J T Jorgenson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees.

Authors:  A Pusey; J Williams; J Goodall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Diet and dominance among female vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops).

Authors:  Patricia L Whitten
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Phenotypic quality influences fertility in Gombe chimpanzees.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Michael L Wilson; Carson Murray; Anne Pusey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better.

Authors:  Sandra Hamel; Steeve D Côté; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Complex sources of variance in female dominance rank in a nepotistic society.

Authors:  Amanda J Lea; Niki H Learn; Marcus J Theus; Jeanne Altmann; Susan C Alberts
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Holger Schielzeth
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A socio-ecological perspective on the gestural communication of great ape species, individuals, and social units.

Authors:  Kirsty E Graham; Gal Badihi; Alexandra Safryghin; Charlotte Grund; Catherine Hobaiter
Journal:  Ethol Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.140

2.  Mountain gorillas maintain strong affiliative biases for maternal siblings despite high male reproductive skew and extensive exposure to paternal kin.

Authors:  Nicholas M Grebe; Jean Paul Hirwa; Tara S Stoinski; Linda Vigilant; Stacy Rosenbaum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.