Literature DB >> 3192395

A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications.

J W Oestmann1, D Kopans, D A Hall, K A McCarthy, J R Rubens, R Greene.   

Abstract

The detectability of malignant tumor-derived microcalcifications with conventional mammography was compared to that with digital images (2000 X 2510 pixels by 10 bits) derived from a storage phosphor-based digital radiography system capable of 5 line pair/mm resolution at identical exposure factors (30 kVp, 250 mAs, 65 cm film-focus distance). Microcalcifications (50-800 microns in diameter) were randomly superimposed on a preserved human breast specimen. ROC analysis based on 480 observations made by four readers indicated that the ability to detect the calcifications with digital images (ROC area = 0.871 +/- 0.066) was equivalent to conventional mammography (ROC area = 0.866 +/- 0.075) despite lower spatial resolution. With digital mammography, 62% of all clusters were correctly localized, but only 23.6% of the individual calcifications were counted. With conventional mammography 61% of all clusters were correctly localized, but significantly more of the individual calcifications (31.5%) were counted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3192395     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198810000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  5 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Picture archiving and communication system bandwidth and storage requirements.

Authors:  J C Honeyman; W Huda; M M Frost; C K Palmer; E V Staab
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications.

Authors:  D V Beard; P Bream; E D Pisano; P Conroy; R E Johnston; P Braeuning; R McLelland; R Clark
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.

Authors:  G J Parkin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.