A Mantovani1, C D Byrne2, E Scorletti3, C S Mantzoros4, G Targher5. 1. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University and Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.targher@univr.it. 2. Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. 3. Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University and Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: There are no approved drugs for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, many randomized controlled trials (RCT) have examined the effect of anti-hyperglycaemic agents on NAFLD in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), since both T2DM and insulin resistance are closely linked to this burdensome liver disease. METHODS: We systematically searched publication databases using predefined keywords to identify head-to-head or placebo-controlled RCTs (published until September 30, 2019) of NAFLD individuals testing the efficacy of anti-hyperglycaemic drugs to specifically treat NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Outcomes of interest included changes in serum liver enzyme levels, liver fat, liver fibrosis, or histologic resolution of NASH. RESULTS: We included 29 RCTs involving a total of 2,617 individuals (∼45% had T2DM) that have used metformin (n=6 studies), glitazones (n=8 studies), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (n=6 studies), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n=4 studies) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (n=7 studies) to treat NAFLD. Although most anti-hyperglycaemic drugs improved serum liver enzyme levels, only glitazones (especially pioglitazone) and liraglutide showed an improvement of histologic features of NAFLD, with a mild beneficial effect also on liver fibrosis for pioglitazone only. CONCLUSION: RCT evidence supports the efficacy of some anti-hyperglycaemic agents (especially pioglitazone) in patients with NAFLD or NASH, though weight gain with pioglitazone may warrant caution. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to better characterize the efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with anti-hyperglycaemic agents in patients with NAFLD.
AIM: There are no approved drugs for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, many randomized controlled trials (RCT) have examined the effect of anti-hyperglycaemic agents on NAFLD in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), since both T2DM and insulin resistance are closely linked to this burdensome liver disease. METHODS: We systematically searched publication databases using predefined keywords to identify head-to-head or placebo-controlled RCTs (published until September 30, 2019) of NAFLD individuals testing the efficacy of anti-hyperglycaemic drugs to specifically treat NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Outcomes of interest included changes in serum liver enzyme levels, liver fat, liver fibrosis, or histologic resolution of NASH. RESULTS: We included 29 RCTs involving a total of 2,617 individuals (∼45% had T2DM) that have used metformin (n=6 studies), glitazones (n=8 studies), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (n=6 studies), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n=4 studies) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (n=7 studies) to treat NAFLD. Although most anti-hyperglycaemic drugs improved serum liver enzyme levels, only glitazones (especially pioglitazone) and liraglutide showed an improvement of histologic features of NAFLD, with a mild beneficial effect also on liver fibrosis for pioglitazone only. CONCLUSION: RCT evidence supports the efficacy of some anti-hyperglycaemic agents (especially pioglitazone) in patients with NAFLD or NASH, though weight gain with pioglitazone may warrant caution. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to better characterize the efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with anti-hyperglycaemic agents in patients with NAFLD.
Authors: Alexandra Jichitu; Simona Bungau; Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Mirela Marioara Toma; Cristiana Bustea; Stela Iurciuc; Marius Rus; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Camelia Cristina Diaconu Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-04-12
Authors: Stephan C Bischoff; Rocco Barazzoni; Luca Busetto; Marjo Campmans-Kuijpers; Vincenzo Cardinale; Irit Chermesh; Ahad Eshraghian; Haluk Tarik Kani; Wafaa Khannoussi; Laurence Lacaze; Miguel Léon-Sanz; Juan M Mendive; Michael W Müller; Johann Ockenga; Frank Tacke; Anders Thorell; Darija Vranesic Bender; Arved Weimann; Cristina Cuerda Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.866
Authors: Melanie J Davies; Vanita R Aroda; Billy S Collins; Robert A Gabbay; Jennifer Green; Nisa M Maruthur; Sylvia E Rosas; Stefano Del Prato; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Tsvetalina Tankova; Apostolos Tsapas; John B Buse Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Giovanni Targher; Kathleen E Corey; Christopher D Byrne; Michael Roden Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 46.802