Literature DB >> 31922258

Surgeons' posture and muscle strain during laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

T Dalager1,2, P T Jensen3,4,5, J R Eriksen6, H L Jakobsen7, O Mogensen5, K Søgaard1,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is assumed that conventional laparoscopy (LAP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) differ in terms of the surgeon's comfort. This study compared muscle workload, work posture and perceived physical exertion of surgeons performing LAP or RALS.
METHODS: Colorectal surgeons with experience in advanced LAP and RALS performed one of each operation. Bipolar surface electromyography (EMG) recordings were made from forearm, shoulder and neck muscles, and expressed relative to EMG maximum (%EMGmax ). The static, median and peak levels of muscle activity were calculated, and an exposure variation analysis undertaken. Postural observations were carried out every 10 min, and ratings of perceived physical exertion before and after surgery were recorded.
RESULTS: The study included 13 surgeons. Surgeons performing LAP showed higher static, median, and peak forearm muscle activity than those undertaking RALS. Muscle activity at peak level was higher during RALS than LAP. Exposure variation analysis demonstrated long-lasting periods of low-level intensity muscle activity in the shoulders for LAP, in the forearms for RALS, and in the neck for both procedures. Postural observations revealed a greater need for a change in work posture when performing LAP compared with RALS. Perceived physical exertion was no different between the surgical modalities.
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery requires long-term static muscle activity with a high physical workload for surgeons. RALS is less demanding on posture.
© 2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31922258     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Surgeons' physical workload in open surgery versus robot-assisted surgery and nonsurgical tasks.

Authors:  Xuelong Fan; Mikael Forsman; Liyun Yang; Carl M Lind; Magnus Kjellman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon-reported benefits of robotic-assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy.

Authors:  T Keating; C A Fleming; A E Brannigan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  "Stand-up straight!": human pose estimation to evaluate postural skills during orthopedic surgery simulations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Casy; Alexandre Tronchot; Hervé Thomazeau; Xavier Morandi; Pierre Jannin; Arnaud Huaulmé
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  The relationship between visual impairments and activity of the neck/shoulder muscles among surgeons during simulated surgical tasks.

Authors:  Ameer Alhusuny; Margaret Cook; Akram Khalil; Andrew Hill; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Authors:  Shing Wai Wong; Zhen Hao Ang; Phillip F Yang; Philip Crowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience.

Authors:  Manuel Durán; Javier Briceño; Ana Padial; Ferdinando Massimiliano Anelli; Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo; María Dolores Ayllón; Rafael Calleja-Lozano; Carmen García-Gaitan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

7.  Surgical trainee experience and opinion of robotic surgery in surgical training and vision for the future: a snapshot study of pan-specialty surgical trainees.

Authors:  Christina A Fleming; Oroog Ali; Joshua M Clements; Johnathan Hirniak; Martin King; Helen M Mohan; Deirdre M Nally; Josh Burke
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Solaini; Antonio Bocchino; Andrea Avanzolini; Domenico Annunziata; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Ercolani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Robotic oncologic colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform (CMR Versius): hope or hype? A preliminary experience from a full-robotic case-series.

Authors:  Cristiano Huscher; Francesco Marchegiani; Francesco Cobellis; Patricia Tejedor; Carlos Pastor; Gianni Lazzarin; James Wheeler; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.699

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.