Literature DB >> 31921540

Visible-to-UV Photon Upconversion in Nanostructured Chromophoric Ionic Liquids.

Shota Hisamitsu1, Junji Miyano1, Keisuke Okumura1, Joseph Ka-Ho Hui1, Nobuhiro Yanai1,2, Nobuo Kimizuka1.   

Abstract

Visible-to-ultraviolet (vis-to-UV) triplet-triplet annihilation based photon upconversion (TTA-UC) is achieved in a non-volatile chromophoric ionic liquid (IL) for the first time. A novel IL is synthesized by combining UV-emitting anion 4-(2-phenyloxazol-5-yl)benzenesulfonate (PPOS) and trihexyltetradecylphosphonium cation (P66614). The nanostructured organization of chromophoric anions is demonstrated by synchrotron X-ray and optical measurements. When the IL is doped with a triplet sensitizer tris(2-phenylpyridinato)iridium(III) (Ir(ppy)3), the visible-to-UV TTA-UC with a relatively low threshold excitation intensity of 61 mW cm-2 is achieved. This is due to a large triplet diffusion coefficient in the IL (1.4×10-7 cm2 s-1) as well as a high absorption coefficient 15 cm-1 and a long PPOS triplet lifetime of 1.55 ms, all implemented in the condensed IL system. This work demonstrates the unique potential of ILs to control chromophore arrangements for desired functions.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional supramolecular chemistry; ionic liquids; nanostructures; photon upconversion; self-assembly

Year:  2019        PMID: 31921540      PMCID: PMC6946949          DOI: 10.1002/open.201900304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemistryOpen        ISSN: 2191-1363            Impact factor:   2.911


The flourishing of the chemistry based on molecular self‐assembly provided a new perspective in soft condensed materials and caused a rise of functional design even in liquids.1 The controlled organization of chromophoric moieties in such condensed soft matters is essential for advanced optical and optoelectronic functions. In this respect, ionic liquids (ILs) are particularly of interest because of the unique bicontinuous nanostructures consisted of polar and nonpolar domains.2 Such a unique bicontinuous structure of ILs allows the controlled accumulation of functional units for desired functions.3 Recent progress in photon upconversion based on triplet‐triplet annihilation (TTA‐UC; Figure S1) has opened a new avenue of photon energy utilization in many areas including biological applications.4, 5 The typical mechanism of TTA‐UC includes multiple Dexter energy transfer processes of donor‐to‐acceptor triplet energy transfer (TET) and inter‐acceptor TTA. Although TTA‐UC has been extensively investigated and optimized for the visible wavelength range, the visible‐to‐ultraviolet (vis‐to‐UV) TTA‐UC is more difficult despite its importance for boosting the efficiency of photocatalysis and artificial photosynthesis.6 For example, a threshold excitation intensity (I) is related to a required excitation intensity for achieving the half of maximum UC quantum yield, which serves as a figure of merit of the TTA‐UC systems.7 Most of the reported vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC systems show high I over several W cm−2 with only a few exceptions below 100 mW cm−2.6c, 6d This is mainly due to the short triplet lifetime of acceptors, inefficient triplet sensitization, or small absorption coefficient. Thus, the development of low‐power vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC molecular systems remains an outstanding issue. In this work, we report the first IL that exhibits vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC (Figure 1a). We have recently reported the green‐to‐blue TTA‐UC with low I in chromophoric ILs, where the acceptor chromophore arrays in the nonpolar IL domain allow effective triplet exciton diffusion.3a, 3b Based on this concept, we designed a new IL composed of flexible alkyl‐chained cation trihexyltetradecylphosphonium (P66614) and UV‐emitting anion 4‐(2‐phenyloxazol‐5‐yl)benzenesulfonate (PPOS) (Figure 1b). Tris(2‐phenylpyridinato)iridium(III) (Ir(ppy)3)‐doped IL P66614PPOS showed a vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC emission with a low I value below 100 mW cm−2, demonstrating the notable performance of self‐assembled chromophoric ILs.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic illustration of vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC by triplet exciton diffusion in the IL P66614PPOS doped with Ir(ppy)3. (b) Chemical structures of acceptor P66614PPOS and donor Ir(ppy)3.

(a) Schematic illustration of vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC by triplet exciton diffusion in the IL P66614PPOS doped with Ir(ppy)3. (b) Chemical structures of acceptor P66614PPOS and donor Ir(ppy)3. NaPPOS was synthesized by sulfonation of PPO. The position of the sulfonate group was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray analysis (Figure S2).8 Subsequent ion‐exchange with P66614Cl gave the UV/blue fluorescent IL P66614PPOS (Figure 2a, b), of which the purity was confirmed by elemental analysis and 1H NMR spectroscopy. A polarized microscopy image of P66614PPOS showed no birefringence, confirming the absence of crystalline components (Figure 2c). A differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermogram of P66614PPOS showed a glass transition at around −44 °C without any exothermic/endothermic peak (Figure S3). These results identify that P66614PPOS forms the IL phase at room temperature. This was also supported by the absence of sharp peaks in its synchrotron powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern (Figure 2d). The PXRD pattern also indicated the existence of the bicontinuous network nanostructures in P66614PPOS composed of polar ionic and nonpolar alkyl/chromophore domains.2, 3a, 3b The low‐angle peak at 2.7° of P66614PPOS was in accordance with those of the precursor IL P66614Cl and our previous blue‐emitting chromophoric IL having the same P66614 cation.3a The distance of 1.75 nm corresponds to the separation between the ionic domains, which is mainly determined by the size of the bulky cation.3a, 3b
Figure 2

(a) Picture of IL P66614PPOS in a glass vial. (b) Optical microscopic image of IL P66614PPOS under UV irradiation (λ=365 nm). (c) Birefringent optical microscopic image of IL P66614PPOS. (d) Synchrotron X‐ray diffraction patterns of P66614PPOS (red), the precursor IL P66614Cl (black), and the previously reported chromophoric IL P66614DPAS (blue). (e) UV‐vis absorption (solid lines) and photoluminescence (PL, dashed lines) spectra of 0.01 mM DMF solution of P66614PPOS (black) and neat P66614PPOS (red).

(a) Picture of IL P66614PPOS in a glass vial. (b) Optical microscopic image of IL P66614PPOS under UV irradiation (λ=365 nm). (c) Birefringent optical microscopic image of IL P66614PPOS. (d) Synchrotron X‐ray diffraction patterns of P66614PPOS (red), the precursor IL P66614Cl (black), and the previously reported chromophoric IL P66614DPAS (blue). (e) UV‐vis absorption (solid lines) and photoluminescence (PL, dashed lines) spectra of 0.01 mM DMF solution of P66614PPOS (black) and neat P66614PPOS (red). In order to evaluate the chromophore assembly structure in the nanostructured P66614PPOS, absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained (Figure 2e). A red‐shifted broad absorption band of the neat IL P66614PPOS compared with that of the 0.01 mM DMF solution of P66614PPOS indicates the electronic interactions between neighboring PPOS in the neat state. The small wavelength shift in the fluorescence spectra of neat IL compared with that of the DMF solution is favorable for TTA‐UC with a maximum anti‐Stokes shift. P66614PPOS in DMF solution showed a single‐exponential fluorescence decay with a lifetime of 1.32 ns (Figure S4). On the other hand, that of the neat IL P66614PPOS was deconvoluted into three components, 0.267 ns (28 %), 1.00 ns (62 %), and 6.34 ns (10 %) with an averaged fluorescent lifetime of 1.34 ns. This multicomponent fluorescence decay would be due to the occasionally‐formed strongly interacting sites, which is not surprising for condensed systems.3a, 3b The fluorescence quantum yields Φ of the neat IL and 0.01 mM DMF solution of P66614PPOS were 37.0 % and 99.3 %, respectively. The smaller Φ in the IL state is due to the decrement of the radiative decay constant (k) and the increment of the nonradiative decay constant (k) associated with the formation of quenching sites for singlet excitons in the condensed IL state (Table S2). Ir(ppy)3 was employed as the triplet donor since its triplet energy level (2.4 eV) is slightly higher than that of PPO (2.3 eV), which facilitates the triplet energy transfer (TET). Upon irradiating 445 nm blue continuous‐wave laser, the 0.1 mol% Ir(ppy)3‐doped P66614PPOS showed an upconverted UV/blue emission with a peak at 378 nm (Figure 3a). The position of the emission peak was identical to that of the fluorescence emission peak of IL P66614PPOS (378 nm, Figure 2e). The achieved anti‐stokes shift of 0.49 eV is larger than those of our previously reported green‐to‐blue upconverting ILs (0.42 eV).3a, 3b The upconversion quantum yield (Φ) of the IL P66614PPOS was 0.44 % at an excitation intensity (I) of 5.0 W cm−2. This efficiency is lower than the Φ observed for a DMF solution containing Ir(ppy)3 (0.1 mM) and P66614PPOS (10 mM) (5.2 % at I=50 W cm−2) and the Φ values of solvent‐free vis‐to‐UV UC systems with the similar anti‐Stokes shift reported by Ma and co‐workers (2.6 %6g and 0.69 %6j). From the phosphorescence quantum yield of Ir(ppy)3, the efficiency of donor‐to‐acceptor TET (Φ) in the IL and that in the DMF solution was estimated to 76 % and 79 %, respectively (see Experimental methods in SI for details). Considering the similar Φ observed for these specimens, the decreased Φ in the IL system would be ascribed to the smaller Φ FL and promoted singlet back energy transfer (BET) in the IL state. The BET quantum yield (Φ) was evaluated as 31 % by analyzing the fluorescence lifetimes of neat P66614PPOS with and without Ir(ppy)3 (Figure S5). Triplet excitons may also be trapped at the strongly‐interacting sites, as observed previously for the chromophoric IL.3b
Figure 3

(a) TTA‐UC emission spectrum of neat P66614PPOS doped with 0.1 mol% Ir(ppy)3 (λ=445 nm, 425 nm short‐pass filter). (b) Double‐logarithm plot of TTA‐UC emission intensity of neat IL P66614PPOS against the incident light power density.

(a) TTA‐UC emission spectrum of neat P66614PPOS doped with 0.1 mol% Ir(ppy)3 (λ=445 nm, 425 nm short‐pass filter). (b) Double‐logarithm plot of TTA‐UC emission intensity of neat IL P66614PPOS against the incident light power density. Significantly, a relatively low I value of 61 mW cm−2 was observed in the donor‐doped IL (Figure 3b), which was much smaller than that of the mixed DMF solution of Ir(ppy)3 and P66614PPOS (512 mW cm−2; Figure S6). The I is described as below,9 where a, α, D, and τ represent the effective TTA distance, absorption coefficient, the triplet diffusion coefficient, and the acceptor triplet lifetime. The acceptor triplet lifetimes were 1.55 ms and 0.976 ms for the neat IL and the DMF solution, respectively (Figure S7). The longer lifetime in the IL P66614PPOS would be due to the suppression of the chromophore mobility in the condensed viscous environment. Another advantage of the condensed IL system is the larger absorption coefficient of α=15 cm−1 compared with that in solution (0.70 cm−1). The triplet diffusion coefficient of the neat IL system was also calculated according to equation (1). The a of PPO molecule was estimated as 0.75 nm by measuring the TTA‐UC properties of a model system; non‐substituted 2,5‐diphenyloxazole (PPO) and Ir(ppy)3 in deaerated DMF (Experimental methods, SI). The calculated D in neat IL P66614PPOS was 1.4×10−7 cm2 s−1, which is only one order of magnitude smaller than the molecular diffusion coefficient of PPO in DMF (4.1×10−6 cm2 s−1). This large triplet exciton diffusion constant is obtained by virtue of the densely organized chromophores in the IL nanostructure. In conclusion, we demonstrate the first example of chromophoric IL exhibiting vis‐to‐UV TTA‐UC. The UV‐emitting chromophores are densely assembled in nonpolar nanodomains of the IL. Furthermore, the low I value is achieved in the IL thanks to the elongated triplet lifetime, the high absorption coefficient and the large triplet exciton diffusion coefficient. These features demonstrate the new potential of nanostructured chromophoric ILs for advanced excitonic functions and their applications to UV‐induced reactions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  43 in total

1.  Intragel photoreduction of aryl halides by green-to-blue upconversion under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  Marleen Häring; Raúl Pérez-Ruiz; Axel Jacobi von Wangelin; David Díaz Díaz
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell with Integrated Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion System.

Authors:  Andrew Nattestad; Yuen Yap Cheng; Rowan W MacQueen; Tim F Schulze; Fletcher W Thompson; Attila J Mozer; Burkhard Fückel; Tony Khoury; Maxwell J Crossley; Klaus Lips; Gordon G Wallace; Timothy W Schmidt
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Charge transfer liquid: a stable donor-acceptor interaction in the solvent-free liquid state.

Authors:  Vivek Chandrakant Wakchaure; Lekshmi V Pillai; Kayaramkodath Chandran Ranjeesh; Suman Chakrabarty; Sapna Ravindranathan; Pattuparambil R Rajamohanan; Sukumaran Santhosh Babu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Harnessing Molecular Photon Upconversion in a Solar Cell at Sub-solar Irradiance: Role of the Redox Mediator.

Authors:  Sean P Hill; Kenneth Hanson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Recent emergence of photon upconversion based on triplet energy migration in molecular assemblies.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Yanai; Nobuo Kimizuka
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Hybridizing semiconductor nanocrystals with metal-organic frameworks for visible and near-infrared photon upconversion.

Authors:  Shogo Amemori; Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Marcus Leo Böhm; James Xiao; Uyen Huynh; Tomoki Oyama; Kenji Kaneko; Akshay Rao; Nobuhiro Yanai; Nobuo Kimizuka
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.390

7.  Nanoscale segregation in room temperature ionic liquids.

Authors:  Alessandro Triolo; Olga Russina; Hans-Jurgen Bleif; Emanuela Di Cola
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Paradigms shift when solvent-less fluids come into play.

Authors:  Sukumaran Santhosh Babu
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  New insight into the nanostructure of ionic liquids: a small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) study on liquid tri-alkyl-methyl-ammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amides and their mixtures.

Authors:  Tanja Pott; Philippe Méléard
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Photoredox catalysis using infrared light via triplet fusion upconversion.

Authors:  Benjamin D Ravetz; Andrew B Pun; Emily M Churchill; Daniel N Congreve; Tomislav Rovis; Luis M Campos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visible-to-UV Photon Upconversion in Nanostructured Chromophoric Ionic Liquids.

Authors:  Shota Hisamitsu; Junji Miyano; Keisuke Okumura; Joseph Ka-Ho Hui; Nobuhiro Yanai; Nobuo Kimizuka
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.911

2.  Approaching the Spin-Statistical Limit in Visible-to-Ultraviolet Photon Upconversion.

Authors:  Axel Olesund; Jessica Johnsson; Fredrik Edhborg; Shima Ghasemi; Kasper Moth-Poulsen; Bo Albinsson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 15.419

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.