| Literature DB >> 31920444 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the anterior segment biometry characteristics in congenital cataract patients before undergoing surgery in a tertiary eye care centre.Entities:
Keywords: Axial length; Biometry; Congenital cataract; Corneal astigmatism; Keratometry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31920444 PMCID: PMC6950949 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.07.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Ophthalmol ISSN: 1319-4534
Axial length measurements in the cataractous eyes of congenital cataract patients by age, sex and laterality of the cataract.
| Axial length | < 1 yr | 1–5 yr | 6–10 yr | 11–15 yr | 0–15 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.5 ± 1.58 | 21.56 ± 2 | 22.39 ± 1.84 | 23.03 ± 1.29 | 22.11 ± 2.02 | |
| (n = 12) | (n = 65) | (n = 100) | (n = 69) | (n = 246) | |
| 18.33 ± 1.12 | 20.99 ± 1.23 | 22 ± 1.78 | 22.1 ± 1.56 | 21.53 ± 1.73 | |
| (n = 5) | (n = 39) | (n = 40) | (n = 21) | (n = 105) | |
| 0.83 | 0.11 | 0.25 | |||
| −1.5 to 1.84 | −0.13 to 1.27 | −0.28 to 1.06 | |||
| 19.24 ± 0.28 | 21.69 ± 1.28 | 22.68 ± 1.82 | 23.23 ± 1.14 | 22.55 ± 1.63 | |
| (n = 2) | (n = 54) | (n = 81) | (n = 61) | (n = 198) | |
| 18.39 ± 1.51 | 21.17 ± 1.8 | 21.94 ± 1.76 | 22.24 ± 1.53 | 21.46 ± 2.05 | |
| (n = 15) | (n = 50) | (n = 59) | (n = 29) | (n = 153) | |
| 0.45 | 0.09 | ||||
| −1.49 to 3.19 | −0.08 to 1.12 | ||||
| 18.46 ± 1.46 | 21.37 ± 1.8 | 22.27 ± 1.82 | 22.8 ± 1.41 | 21.94 ± 1.95 | |
| (n = 17) | (n = 104) | (n = 140) | (n = 90) | (n = 351) |
Standard deviation (SD). Bold data are statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Fig. 1Distribution of mean keratometry in 1 D step in the entire sample of congenital cataract patients.
Mean keratometry measurements in the cataractous eyes of congenital cataract patients according to age, gender and laterality of the cataract.
| Keratometry | <1 yr | 1–5 yr | 6–10 yr | 11–15 yr | 0–15 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.04 ± 3.4 | 44.21 ± 2.58 | 43.69 ± 2.06 | 43.38 ± 2.22 | 43.88 ± 2.41 | |
| (n = 12) | (n = 65) | (n = 100) | (n = 69) | (n = 246) | |
| 45.69 ± 0.48 | 44.78 ± 2.02 | 45.02 ± 2.75 | 43.79 ± 2.21 | 44.71 ± 2.38 | |
| (n = 5) | (n = 39) | (n = 40) | (n = 21) | (n = 105) | |
| 0.83 | 0.24 | 0.0022 | 0.46 | ||
| −2.97 to 3.67 | −1.52 to 0.39 | −2.17 to −0.49 | −1.51 to 0.69 | ||
| 50.90 ± 6.72 | 44.00 ± 2.41 | 43.32 ± 2.13 | 43.09 ± 1.73 | 43.51 ± 2.29 | |
| (n = 2) | (n = 54) | (n = 81) | (n = 61) | (n = 198) | |
| 44.49 ± 2.02 | 44.79 ± 2.4 | 44.48 ± 2.72 | 44.62 ± 2.04 | 44.60 ± 2.43 | |
| (n = 15) | (n = 50) | (n = 59) | (n = 29) | (n = 153) | |
| 0.097 | |||||
| −1.73 to 0.15 | |||||
| 45.96 ± 2.98 | 44.40 ± 2.42 | 44.08 ± 1.82 | 43.48 ± 1.41 | 44.12 ± 1.95 | |
| (n = 17) | (n = 104) | (n = 140) | (n = 90) | (n = 351) |
Standard deviation (SD). Bold data are statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Fig. 2Distribution of the corneal astigmatism in 1 D step in the entire sample of congenital cataract patients.
Fig. 3Types of corneal astigmatism in the entire sample of congenital cataract patients.