OBJECTIVE: To compare detectability of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue (HPT) by digital and analog 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and negative/inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy-SPECT/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and negative/inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy-SPECT/CT were prospectively included. All patients accepted to be scanned by digital and analog PET/CT in the same imaging session after a single injection of 18F-fluorocholine. Three nuclear medicine physicians evaluated the digital and analog PET/CT datasets to assess the detection rate of HPT. Maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of HPT and locoregional lymph nodes were measured in both systems. RESULTS: HPT was detected in 30/33 patients by the digital system, whereas it was detected in 22/33 patients by the analog system (p < 0.01). Moreover, in 21 of these 33 patients, both systems detected one focal 18F-fluorocholine uptake, and in one patient the digital system detected two foci. Histopathology demonstrated HPT in 32 patients and it was inconclusive in one patient. The digital PET/CT detected HPT in 29 of the 32 patients, and the analog system in 22 of the 32 (p < 0.01). All HPT suspected lesions resected and detected only by the digital system (n = 8) were < 10 mm (7.5 ± 1.3 mm), while those detected by both systems (n = 22) were > 10 mm (13 ± 3.8 mm). SUVmax of HPT lesions was significantly higher than SUVmax of locoregional lymph node independently of the PET/CT system used (4.5 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Digital PET/CT offers superior performance over analog system in patients with suspected HPT and previous negative/inconclusive imaging examinations, particularly in sub-centimeter lesions. SUVmax can help in the differentiation between HTP and locoregional lymph nodes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare detectability of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue (HPT) by digital and analog 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and negative/inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy-SPECT/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and negative/inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy-SPECT/CT were prospectively included. All patients accepted to be scanned by digital and analog PET/CT in the same imaging session after a single injection of 18F-fluorocholine. Three nuclear medicine physicians evaluated the digital and analog PET/CT datasets to assess the detection rate of HPT. Maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of HPT and locoregional lymph nodes were measured in both systems. RESULTS: HPT was detected in 30/33 patients by the digital system, whereas it was detected in 22/33 patients by the analog system (p < 0.01). Moreover, in 21 of these 33 patients, both systems detected one focal 18F-fluorocholine uptake, and in one patient the digital system detected two foci. Histopathology demonstrated HPT in 32 patients and it was inconclusive in one patient. The digital PET/CT detected HPT in 29 of the 32 patients, and the analog system in 22 of the 32 (p < 0.01). All HPT suspected lesions resected and detected only by the digital system (n = 8) were < 10 mm (7.5 ± 1.3 mm), while those detected by both systems (n = 22) were > 10 mm (13 ± 3.8 mm). SUVmax of HPT lesions was significantly higher than SUVmax of locoregional lymph node independently of the PET/CT system used (4.5 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Digital PET/CT offers superior performance over analog system in patients with suspected HPT and previous negative/inconclusive imaging examinations, particularly in sub-centimeter lesions. SUVmax can help in the differentiation between HTP and locoregional lymph nodes.
Entities:
Keywords:
18F-fluorocholine; 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy; Analog PET/CT; Digital PET/CT; Parathyroid adenoma; Primary hyperparathyroidism
Authors: Giorgio Treglia; Arnoldo Piccardo; Alessio Imperiale; Klaus Strobel; Philipp A Kaufmann; John O Prior; Luca Giovanella Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: I Bossert; S Chytiris; M Hodolic; L Croce; L Mansi; L Chiovato; G Mariani; G Trifirò Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Diego Alfonso López-Mora; Albert Flotats; Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo; Valle Camacho; Alejandro Fernández; Agustí Ruiz; Joan Duch; Marina Sizova; Anna Domènech; Montserrat Estorch; Ignasi Carrió Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Serena Grimaldi; Jacques Young; Peter Kamenicky; Dana Hartl; Marie Terroir; Sophie Leboulleux; Amandine Berdelou; Julien Hadoux; Segolene Hescot; Hervé Remy; Eric Baudin; Martin Schlumberger; Désirée Deandreis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-04-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Tracy S Wang; Daniel T Ruan; James A Lee; Sylvia L Asa; Quan-Yang Duh; Gerard M Doherty; Miguel F Herrera; Janice L Pasieka; Nancy D Perrier; Shonni J Silverberg; Carmen C Solórzano; Cord Sturgeon; Mitchell E Tublin; Robert Udelsman; Sally E Carty Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo; Diego Alfonso López-Mora; Albert Flotats; Gabriela Paillahueque; Valle Camacho; Joan Duch; Alejandro Fernández; Anna Domènech; Montserrat Estorch; Ignasi Carrió Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Nghi C Nguyen; Jose L Vercher-Conejero; Abdus Sattar; Michael A Miller; Piotr J Maniawski; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic; Kuan-Hao Su; James K O'Donnell; Peter F Faulhaber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ivo Rausch; Jacobo Cal-González; David Dapra; Hans Jürgen Gallowitsch; Peter Lind; Thomas Beyer; Gregory Minear Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2015-10-26
Authors: Laura Iconaru; Linda Spinato; Ruth Duttmann; Anne-Sophie Hambye; Arnaud Devriendt; Maxime Herchuelz; Celine Mathey; Rafik Karmali; Pierre Bergmann Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: David Kersting; Stephan Settelmeier; Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi; Ken Herrmann; Robert Seifert; Christoph Rischpler Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 5.923