Literature DB >> 31916231

Informing Medication Discontinuation Decisions among Older Adults with Relapsing-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Natalie A Schwehr1, Karen M Kuntz2, Eva A Enns2, Nathan D Shippee2, Elaine Kingwell3, Helen Tremlett3, Adam F Carpenter4,5, Mary Butler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For older adults with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis (MS), limited information is available to inform if, or when, disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) may be safely discontinued.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to project the outcomes of DMD discontinuation among older adults with relapsing-onset MS.
METHODS: We projected the 10-year outcomes of discontinuation of a DMD (interferon-β, fingolimod, or natalizumab) among older adults (aged 55 or 70 years) who were relapse-free for 5 or more years and had not reached an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6. Outcomes included the percentage of people who had at least one relapse or reached EDSS 6, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which incorporated both relapses and disability. We used a simulation modeling approach. With increased age, relapses decreased and the effectiveness of DMDs for disability outcomes also decreased.
RESULTS: We found lower projected benefits for DMD continuation at 70 years of age than at 55 years of age. Compared with discontinuation, the projected benefit of DMD continuation ranged from 0.007 to 0.017 QALYs at 55 years of age and dropped to 0.002-0.006 at 70 years of age. The annual projected benefits of DMD continuation (0.1-3.0 quality-adjusted life-days) were very low compared with typical patient preferences regarding treatment burden.
CONCLUSION: The benefits of DMDs may not be substantial among older adults with relapsing-onset MS. Direct clinical evidence remains limited and the decision of whether to discontinue a DMD should also take into account patient preferences. It is important to gain a better understanding of how age-related changes in the trajectory of relapsing-onset MS affect treatment effectiveness among older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31916231      PMCID: PMC7047543          DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00741-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  55 in total

1.  Investigation of heterogeneity in the association between interferon beta and disability progression in multiple sclerosis: an observational study.

Authors:  A Shirani; Y Zhao; M E Karim; J Petkau; P Gustafson; C Evans; E Kingwell; M L van der Kop; J Oger; H Tremlett
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 2.  Incorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Victoria K Brennan; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Disability as an outcome in MS clinical trials.

Authors:  G C Ebers; L Heigenhauser; M Daumer; C Lederer; J H Noseworthy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Effect of relapses on development of residual deficit in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Fred D Lublin; Monika Baier; Gary Cutter
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Multiple sclerosis relapses: a multivariable analysis of residual disability determinants.

Authors:  M Vercellino; A Romagnolo; A Mattioda; S Masera; C Piacentino; A Merola; A Chiò; R Mutani; P Cavalla
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.209

6.  Patient and community preferences for treatments and health states in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lisa A Prosser; Karen M Kuntz; Amit Bar-Or; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease-modifying drugs: A best-worst scaling.

Authors:  Ingrid E H Kremer; Silvia M A A Evers; Peter J Jongen; Mickaël Hiligsmann
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis: Long-Term Management.

Authors:  Marinella Clerico; Carlo Alberto Artusi; Alessandra Di Liberto; Simona Rolla; Valentina Bardina; Pierangelo Barbero; Stefania Federica De Mercanti; Luca Durelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Silent progression in disease activity-free relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bruce A C Cree; Jill A Hollenbach; Riley Bove; Gina Kirkish; Simone Sacco; Eduardo Caverzasi; Antje Bischof; Tristan Gundel; Alyssa H Zhu; Nico Papinutto; William A Stern; Carolyn Bevan; Andrew Romeo; Douglas S Goodin; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Jennifer Graves; Ari J Green; Michael R Wilson; Scott S Zamvil; Chao Zhao; Refujia Gomez; Nicholas R Ragan; Gillian Q Rush; Patrick Barba; Adam Santaniello; Sergio E Baranzini; Jorge R Oksenberg; Roland G Henry; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains.

Authors:  Josa M Frischer; Stephan Bramow; Assunta Dal-Bianco; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Helmut Rauschka; Manfred Schmidbauer; Henning Laursen; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Hans Lassmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  2 in total

1.  Delirium Severity Trajectories and Outcomes in ICU Patients. Defining a Dynamic Symptom Phenotype.

Authors:  Heidi Lindroth; Babar A Khan; Janet S Carpenter; Sujuan Gao; Anthony J Perkins; Sikandar H Khan; Sophia Wang; Richard N Jones; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-09

2.  Disease-modifying therapy prescription patterns in people with multiple sclerosis by age.

Authors:  Yinan Zhang; Amber Salter; Shan Jin; William J Culpepper; Gary R Cutter; Mitchell Wallin; Olaf Stuve
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.