Filippo Randelli1, Elisabetta Antonia Nocerino2, Luca Nicosia3, Marco Alì4, Caterina Beatrice Monti5, Francesco Sardanelli2,5, Alberto Aliprandi6. 1. Hip Department and Trauma, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. 2. Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. 3. Breast Radiology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. lucanicosia88@gmail.com. 4. Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 6. Unit of Radiology, Clinical Institutes Zucchi, Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip with intra-articular injection of high-viscosity hyaluronic acid (HA-MRA) versus Gd-based contrast agent (Gd-MRA) in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Design: single-centre, observational, retrospective, inter-individual, and cross-sectional. FAI patients who underwent HA-MRA (3 mL of high-viscosity HA plus 17 mL of saline) were compared with 37 age- and sex-matched FAI patients who underwent Gd-MRA (20 mL of 2 mmol/L solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine). Two independent blinded radiologists assessed image quality for all sequences (two-dimensional proton density, non-fat-sat axial, fat-sat coronal and sagittal; three-dimensional dual-echo steady state), using a 5-point Likert scale considering separately labrum, cartilage, round ligament, transverse ligament, and capsule. Pearson χ2 and Cohen κ were used. RESULTS: The HA-MRA group was composed of 37 patients (23 males, 14 females; median age 38 years), the Gd-MRA group of 37 patients (21 males, 16 females; median age 38 years), without significant difference for age (p = 0.937) and sex (p = 0.636). Image quality did not differ between the two readers for any structure: labrum (p ≥ 0.340), cartilage (p ≥ 0.198), round ligament (p ≥ 0.255), transverse ligament (p ≥ 0.806), and capsule (p ≥ 0.314). Inter-reader agreement (κ) ranged from 0.785 to 1.000. CONCLUSIONS: HA-MRA provided an image quality not significantly different from that of Gd-MRA. This may open the possibility of combining MRA and viscosupplementation in one single procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip with intra-articular injection of high-viscosity hyaluronic acid (HA-MRA) versus Gd-based contrast agent (Gd-MRA) in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Design: single-centre, observational, retrospective, inter-individual, and cross-sectional. FAI patients who underwent HA-MRA (3 mL of high-viscosity HA plus 17 mL of saline) were compared with 37 age- and sex-matched FAI patients who underwent Gd-MRA (20 mL of 2 mmol/L solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine). Two independent blinded radiologists assessed image quality for all sequences (two-dimensional proton density, non-fat-sat axial, fat-sat coronal and sagittal; three-dimensional dual-echo steady state), using a 5-point Likert scale considering separately labrum, cartilage, round ligament, transverse ligament, and capsule. Pearson χ2 and Cohen κ were used. RESULTS: The HA-MRA group was composed of 37 patients (23 males, 14 females; median age 38 years), the Gd-MRA group of 37 patients (21 males, 16 females; median age 38 years), without significant difference for age (p = 0.937) and sex (p = 0.636). Image quality did not differ between the two readers for any structure: labrum (p ≥ 0.340), cartilage (p ≥ 0.198), round ligament (p ≥ 0.255), transverse ligament (p ≥ 0.806), and capsule (p ≥ 0.314). Inter-reader agreement (κ) ranged from 0.785 to 1.000. CONCLUSIONS: HA-MRA provided an image quality not significantly different from that of Gd-MRA. This may open the possibility of combining MRA and viscosupplementation in one single procedure.
Entities:
Keywords:
(MeSH terms); Arthrography; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip joint; Hyaluronic acid; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Joseph McCarthy; Philip Noble; Frank V Aluisio; Michael Schuck; John Wright; Jo-ann Lee Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: A Migliore; S Tormenta; C Valente; U Massafra; L S Martin Martin; E Carmenini; A Bernardini; A Alimonti Journal: Reumatismo Date: 2005 Jan-Mar
Authors: Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Jacob M Buchowski; Levon A Nazarian; Samridhi Narula; Monica Musto; Nicholas U Ahn; Frank J Frassica Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.176