| Literature DB >> 31915068 |
Atul Malhotra1,2,3, Margie Castillo-Melendez4,5, Beth J Allison4,5, Amy E Sutherland4, Ilias Nitsos4, Yen Pham4, Courtney A McDonald4, Michael C Fahey6,4, Graeme R Polglase4,5, Graham Jenkin4,5, Suzanne L Miller4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neonatal ventilation exacerbates brain injury in lambs with fetal growth restriction (FGR), characterized by neuroinflammation and reduced blood-brain barrier integrity, which is normally maintained by the neurovascular unit. We examined whether umbilical cord blood stem cell (UCBC) treatment stabilized the neurovascular unit and reduced brain injury in preterm ventilated FGR lambs.Entities:
Keywords: Brain injury; FGR; IUGR; Intrauterine growth restriction; Preterm; Ventilation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31915068 PMCID: PMC6947982 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1526-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Body, organ weights, and organ/body weight ratios for the lamb groups
| AGA ( | FGR ( | AGA+UCBC ( | FGR+UCBC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.4* | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.2* |
| Brain weight (g) | 43.9 ± 2.2 | 43.9 ± 4.7 | 46.4 ± 3.7 | 42.4 ± 3.6 |
| Brain/body weight (g/kg) | 14.8 ± 1.7 | 17.9 ± 2.5* | 15.2 ± 1.8 | 20.8 ± 2.6* |
| Liver weight (g) | 127.2 ± 26.1 | 94.4 ± 30.2* | 121.4 ± 16.7 | 89.0 ± 15.3* |
| Liver/body weight (g/kg) | 42.1 ± 3.6 | 37.4 ± 7.6 | 39.5 ± 4.5 | 41.1 ± 21.6 |
| Lung weight (g) | 93.5 ± 11.2 | 80.0 ± 37.3 | 95.7 ± 9.3 | 71.8 ± 4.2* |
| Lung/body weight (g/kg) | 31.6 ± 5.5 | 31.4 ± 10.2 | 31.4 ± 4.6 | 33.3 ± 17.4 |
| Heart weight (g) | 26.7 ± 4.3 | 20.4 ± 6.8* | 25.2 ± 2.5 | 16.4 ± 1.8* |
| Heart/body weight (g/kg) | 8.9 ± 1.5 | 8.1 ± 1.9 | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 7.5 ± 3.9 |
Data expressed as mean + SD. Two-way ANOVA analysis was applied for each parameter. *Significant differences between corresponding FGR vs. AGA lamb groups
Fig. 1a Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) across lamb groups over the course of the experiment. b Carotid blood flow (CBF) as a surrogate for cerebral blood flow across lamb groups. c Cerebrovascular resistance for lamb groups. Number sign denotes significant differences between FGR vs. FGR+UCBC group at highlighted time points, p < 0.05. Dotted lines denote the timing of UCBC administration; three-way RM ANOVA was applied across all parameters. ptime signifies time interaction; pFGR vs. AGA signifies growth interaction
Fig. 2Representative photomicrograph of CFSE-labeled cells (arrows) in subcortical white matter of a FGR+UCBC lamb. BV blood vessel. Scale bar = 50 μm
Fig. 3a Representative photomicrographs of Iba-1-positive inflammatory cells in SCWM across groups. b Quantitative analysis of Iba-1 cell counts across brain regions; two-way ANOVA applied. c Representative photomicrographs of GFAP-positive astrocytes in SCWM across groups. d Quantitative analysis of GFAP cells across brain regions; two-way ANOVA analysis applied. d Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α across groups over the course of the experiment; two-way RM ANOVA applied. No significant rise in pro-inflammatory cytokines in FGR as compared to AGA lamb groups, but a significant decrease in TNF-α levels seen in FGR+UCBC vs. FGR. Asterisk denotes FGR significantly different to AGA. Number sign denotes FGR+UCBC significantly different to FGR; significant differences accepted at p < 0.05. All scale bars = 50 μm
Fig. 4a Representative photomicrographs of 4-HNE-positive cells demonstrating oxidative stress in SCWM across groups. b Quantitative analysis of 4-HNE cell counts across white matter brain regions; two-way ANOVA applied. Asterisk denotes FGR significantly different to AGA; significant differences accepted at p < 0.05. All scale bars = 50 μm
Fig. 5a Representative photomicrographs of Ki-67-positive cell proliferation in SVZ across groups. b Quantitative analysis of Ki-67 cell counts across brain regions; two-way ANOVA applied. c Representative photomicrographs of Ki-67-positive blood vessels in PVWM in FGR+UCBC animals. d Quantitative analysis of Ki-67-positive blood vessels across brain regions. Number sign denotes significant difference between FGR+UCBC vs. all other groups. Caret symbol denotes significant difference between FGR+UCBC vs. AGA+UCBC group. Asterisk denotes significant difference between FGR+UCBC vs. all other groups; significant differences accepted at p < 0.05. All scale bars = 50 μm
Fig. 6a Representative photomicrographs of Glut-1-positive endothelial cell proliferation in PVWM across groups. Scale bar = 50 μm. b Quantitative analysis of Glut-1 cell counts across brain regions; two-way ANOVA applied. c Quantitative analysis of Glut-1-positive percent area in PVWM across groups. d Representative photomicrographs of Desmin-SMA double label fluorescent staining showing poor (a, FGR) and good (b, FGR+UCBC) co-localization within the neurovascular unit. Scale bar = 100 μm. Asterisk denotes significant difference between FGR vs. AGA groups. Number sign denotes significant difference between FGR+UCBC vs. all other groups. e Quantitative analysis of co-localization coefficients (M1 and M2), showing significant reduction (*) in co-localization coefficients in FGR lambs, which is normalized with UCBC therapy; significant differences accepted at p < 0.05
Fig. 7Schematic showing the possible mechanisms of action of UCBC therapy on the neurovascular unit in FGR lambs. Image courtesy: Dr. Jean Tan