Literature DB >> 3191359

Differing interpretations by pathologists of the pT category and grade of transitional cell cancer of the bladder.

P D Abel1, D Henderson, M K Bennett, R R Hall, G Williams.   

Abstract

The UICC pT category for transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the bladder was recorded as assigned from the routine service of a pathology laboratory. All reports had been passed for release after review by pathologists of the status of senior registrar or above. After 99 cases had been collected, the slides available to the original pathologist were reviewed by one dedicated pathologist in continuous session who was ignorant of the original report. No new sections were cut. There was disagreement with the original report of pT category in 14 cases: 13 were downstaged (including 6 from invasive to superficial) and 1 upstaged. There was disagreement with the original differentiation grade in 13 cases: 10 TCC were considered to be more differentiated and 3 less differentiated than the original report. A second pathologist reviewed the pT category only of 13 of the 14 cases, disagreeing with the original pT category on 8 occasions and with the pT category assigned by the dedicated pathologist on 7 occasions. These findings have important implications for advising patients on prognosis and clinical management and in the design and reporting of therapeutic trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3191359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  22 in total

1.  The optimal management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Nepple; Michael A O'Donnell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

3.  Histologic grading of urothelial papillary neoplasms: impact of combined grading (two-numbered grading system) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Burçin Tuna; Kutsal Yörükoglu; Ender Düzcan; Sait Sen; Nalan Nese; Banu Sarsık; Aysegul Akder; Sehnaz Sayhan; Uğur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Applicability of the EORTC risk tables to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Turkish patients.

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kılınç; Göksel Bayar; Ayhan Dalkılıç; Nurettin Cem Sönmez; Serdar Arısan; Soner Güney
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-01-06

5.  Tumour Behaviour of Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Satya Dutta; Biswajit Dey; Vandana Raphael; Yookarin Khonglah; Jaya Mishra; Evarisalin Marbaniang; Pranjal Kalita; Stephen Sailo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-29

6.  [Tumors of the urinary system. Current and old problems].

Authors:  S Minner; G Sauter
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Lamina propria microinvasion of bladder tumors, incidence on stage allocation (pTa vs pT1): recommended approach. Pathologists of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Proposal for changes in cystoscopic follow up of patients with bladder cancer and adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy.

Authors:  R R Hall; M K Parmar; A B Richards; P H Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-22

10.  The value of tumour spread, grading and growth pattern as morphological predictive parameters in bladder carcinoma. A critical revision of the 1987 TNM classification.

Authors:  J C Angulo; J I Lopez; N Flores; J D Toledo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.