Literature DB >> 31913268

Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration.

Xiaowei Tong1,2, Martin Brandt2, Yuemin Yue3,4, Philippe Ciais5, Martin Rudbeck Jepsen2, Josep Penuelas6,7, Jean-Pierre Wigneron8, Xiangming Xiao9, Xiao-Peng Song10, Stephanie Horion2, Kjeld Rasmussen2, Sassan Saatchi11, Lei Fan8, Kelin Wang12,13, Bing Zhang14, Zhengchao Chen14, Yuhang Wang15, Xiaojun Li8, Rasmus Fensholt2.   

Abstract

Land use policies have turned southern China into one of the most intensively managed forest regions in the world, with actions maximizing forest cover on soils with marginal agricultural potential while concurrently increasing livelihoods and mitigating climate change. Based on satellite observations, here we show that diverse land use changes in southern China have increased standing aboveground carbon stocks by 0.11 ± 0.05 Pg C y-1 during 2002-2017. Most of this regional carbon sink was contributed by newly established forests (32%), while forests already existing contributed 24%. Forest growth in harvested forest areas contributed 16% and non-forest areas contributed 28% to the carbon sink, while timber harvest was tripled. Soil moisture declined significantly in 8% of the area. We demonstrate that land management in southern China has been removing an amount of carbon equivalent to 33% of regional fossil CO2 emissions during the last 6 years, but forest growth saturation, land competition for food production and soil-water depletion challenge the longevity of this carbon sink service.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31913268      PMCID: PMC6949300          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13798-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  27 in total

1.  Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Esteban G Jobbágy; Roni Avissar; Somnath Baidya Roy; Damian J Barrett; Charles W Cook; Kathleen A Farley; David C le Maitre; Bruce A McCarl; Brian C Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms.

Authors:  Kun Huang; Jianyang Xia; Yingping Wang; Anders Ahlström; Jiquan Chen; Robert B Cook; Erqian Cui; Yuanyuan Fang; Joshua B Fisher; Deborah Nicole Huntzinger; Zhao Li; Anna M Michalak; Yang Qiao; Kevin Schaefer; Christopher Schwalm; Jing Wang; Yaxing Wei; Xiaoni Xu; Liming Yan; Chenyu Bian; Yiqi Luo
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss.

Authors:  A Baccini; W Walker; L Carvalho; M Farina; D Sulla-Menashe; R A Houghton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998.

Authors:  J Fang; A Chen; C Peng; S Zhao; L Ci
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Erb; Thomas Kastner; Christoph Plutzar; Anna Liza S Bais; Nuno Carvalhais; Tamara Fetzel; Simone Gingrich; Helmut Haberl; Christian Lauk; Maria Niedertscheider; Julia Pongratz; Martin Thurner; Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management.

Authors:  Chi Chen; Taejin Park; Xuhui Wang; Shilong Piao; Baodong Xu; Rajiv K Chaturvedi; Richard Fuchs; Victor Brovkin; Philippe Ciais; Rasmus Fensholt; Hans Tømmervik; Govindasamy Bala; Zaichun Zhu; Ramakrishna R Nemani; Ranga B Myneni
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2019-02-11

7.  Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery.

Authors:  Andrés Viña; William J McConnell; Hongbo Yang; Zhenci Xu; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world's largest reforestation programme.

Authors:  Fangyuan Hua; Xiaoyang Wang; Xinlei Zheng; Brendan Fisher; Lin Wang; Jianguo Zhu; Ya Tang; Douglas W Yu; David S Wilcove
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Divergent hydrological response to large-scale afforestation and vegetation greening in China.

Authors:  Yue Li; Shilong Piao; Laurent Z X Li; Anping Chen; Xuhui Wang; Philippe Ciais; Ling Huang; Xu Lian; Shushi Peng; Zhenzhong Zeng; Kai Wang; Liming Zhou
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Guillaume Marie; Aude Valade; Yi-Ying Chen; Sylvestre Njakou Djomo; James Ryder; Juliane Otto; Kim Naudts; Anne Sofie Lansø; Josefine Ghattas; Matthew J McGrath
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Forest expansion dominates China's land carbon sink since 1980.

Authors:  Zhen Yu; Philippe Ciais; Shilong Piao; Richard A Houghton; Chaoqun Lu; Hanqin Tian; Evgenios Agathokleous; Giri Raj Kattel; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Goll; Xu Yue; Anthony Walker; Pierre Friedlingstein; Atul K Jain; Shirong Liu; Guoyi Zhou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Sink Dynamics at County Scale: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Shuohua Liu; Xiao Zhang; Yifan Zhou; Shunbo Yao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.