Literature DB >> 16373572

Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration.

Robert B Jackson1, Esteban G Jobbágy, Roni Avissar, Somnath Baidya Roy, Damian J Barrett, Charles W Cook, Kathleen A Farley, David C le Maitre, Bruce A McCarl, Brian C Murray.   

Abstract

Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373572     DOI: 10.1126/science.1119282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  63 in total

1.  The potential role for management of U.S. public lands in greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy.

Authors:  Lydia P Olander; David M Cooley; Christopher S Galik
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Greening China naturally.

Authors:  Shixiong Cao; Ge Sun; Zhiqiang Zhang; Liding Chen; Qi Feng; Bojie Fu; Steve McNulty; David Shankman; Jianwu Tang; Yanhui Wang; Xiaohua Wei
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Climate change and peak oil: the urgent need for a transition to a non-carbon-emitting society.

Authors:  Josep Peñuelas; Jofre Carnicer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Combating climate change: what will China's forestry industry do?

Authors:  Xiaohui Yang; Xiaoping Wang; Nuyun Li
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Long-term tobacco plantation induces soil acidification and soil base cation loss.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Xinhua He; Hong Liang; Jian Zhao; Yueqiang Zhang; Chen Xu; Xiaojun Shi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Is a Clean Development Mechanism project economically justified? Case study of an International Carbon Sequestration Project in Iran.

Authors:  Salih Katircioglu; Sara Dalir; Hossein G Olya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Spatial variation in vegetation structure coupled to plant available water determined by two-dimensional soil resistivity profiling in a Brazilian savanna.

Authors:  Joice N Ferreira; Mercedes Bustamante; Diana C Garcia-Montiel; Kelly K Caylor; Eric A Davidson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Rattan Lal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends.

Authors:  Shilong Piao; Pierre Friedlingstein; Philippe Ciais; Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré; David Labat; Sönke Zaehle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Is the water footprint an appropriate tool for forestry and forest products: the Fennoscandian case.

Authors:  Samuli Launiainen; Martyn N Futter; David Ellison; Nicholas Clarke; Leena Finér; Lars Högbom; Ari Laurén; Eva Ring
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.