Kevin Damman1, Joost C Beusekamp1, Eva M Boorsma1, Henk P Swart2, Tom D J Smilde3, Arif Elvan4, J W Martijn van Eck5, Hiddo J L Heerspink1,6, Adriaan A Voors1. 1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Antonius Ziekenhuis Sneek, Sneek, The Netherlands. 3. TREANT zorggroep, Emmen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Cardiology, ISALA, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 5. Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, The Netherlands. 6. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: Inhibition of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) reduces the risk of death and heart failure (HF) admissions in patients with chronic HF. However, safety and clinical efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with acute decompensated HF are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre pilot study, we randomized 80 acute HF patients with and without diabetes to eitherempagliflozin 10 mg/day or placebofor 30 days. The primary outcomes were change in visual analogue scale (VAS) dyspnoea score, diuretic response (weight change per 40 mg furosemide), change in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and length of stay. Secondary outcomes included safety and clinical endpoints. Mean age was 76 years, 33% were female, 47% had de novo HF and median NT-proBNP was 5236 pg/mL. No difference was observed in VAS dyspnoea score, diuretic response, length of stay, or change in NT-proBNP between empagliflozin and placebo. Empagliflozin reduced a combined endpoint of in-hospital worsening HF, rehospitalization for HF or death at 60 days compared with placebo [4 (10%) vs. 13 (33%); P = 0.014]. Urinary output up until day 4 was significantly greater with empagliflozin vs. placebo [difference 3449 (95% confidence interval 578-6321) mL; P < 0.01]. Empagliflozin was safe, well tolerated, and had no adverse effects on blood pressure or renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute HF, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on change in VAS dyspnoea, diuretic response, NT-proBNP, and length of hospital stay, but was safe, increased urinary output and reduced a combined endpoint of worsening HF, rehospitalization for HF or death at 60 days.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Inhibition of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) reduces the risk of death and heart failure (HF) admissions in patients with chronic HF. However, safety and clinical efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with acute decompensated HF are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre pilot study, we randomized 80 acute HFpatients with and without diabetes to either empagliflozin 10 mg/day or placebo for 30 days. The primary outcomes were change in visual analogue scale (VAS) dyspnoea score, diuretic response (weight change per 40 mg furosemide), change in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and length of stay. Secondary outcomes included safety and clinical endpoints. Mean age was 76 years, 33% were female, 47% had de novo HF and median NT-proBNP was 5236 pg/mL. No difference was observed in VAS dyspnoea score, diuretic response, length of stay, or change in NT-proBNP between empagliflozin and placebo. Empagliflozin reduced a combined endpoint of in-hospital worsening HF, rehospitalization for HF or death at 60 days compared with placebo [4 (10%) vs. 13 (33%); P = 0.014]. Urinary output up until day 4 was significantly greater with empagliflozin vs. placebo [difference 3449 (95% confidence interval 578-6321) mL; P < 0.01]. Empagliflozin was safe, well tolerated, and had no adverse effects on blood pressure or renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute HF, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on change in VAS dyspnoea, diuretic response, NT-proBNP, and length of hospital stay, but was safe, increased urinary output and reduced a combined endpoint of worsening HF, rehospitalization for HF or death at 60 days.
Authors: Eva M Boorsma; Jozine M Ter Maaten; Kevin Damman; Wilfried Dinh; Finn Gustafsson; Steven Goldsmith; Daniel Burkhoff; Faiez Zannad; James E Udelson; Adriaan A Voors Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Sandeep R Das; Brendan M Everett; Kim K Birtcher; Jenifer M Brown; James L Januzzi; Rita R Kalyani; Mikhail Kosiborod; Melissa Magwire; Pamela B Morris; Joshua J Neumiller; Laurence S Sperling Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Muthiah Vaduganathan; Stephen J Greene; Shuaiqi Zhang; Maria Grau-Sepulveda; Adam D DeVore; Javed Butler; Paul A Heidenreich; Joanna C Huang; Michelle M Kittleson; Karen E Joynt Maddox; James J McDermott; Anjali Tiku Owens; Pamela N Peterson; Scott D Solomon; Orly Vardeny; Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Saif Ali; Sharon Jung; Shuktika Nandkeolyar; Liset Stoletniy; Antoine Sakr; Frederik H Verbrugge; Anthony Hilliard; Dmitry Abramov Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 3.571
Authors: Henri Lu; Hortense Lu; Christophe Kosinski; Anne Wojtusciszyn; Anne Zanchi; Pierre-Nicolas Carron; Martin Müller; Philippe Meyer; Jehan Martin; Olivier Muller; Roger Hullin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.241