Literature DB >> 31912431

Can Authorship be Denied for Contract Work?

Livia Puljak1, Dario Sambunjak2.   

Abstract

Ethical considerations arise when individuals who were contracted and paid to conduct a research study and write it up for publication, are denied authorship on a scholarly publication on the grounds that their work was contracted and paid for. Each of the various stakeholders should be considered. Researchers need to make sure that the contract recognizes their intellectual contribution and their right to be named as authors if and when the contracted study is published. If authorship disputes of published works arise, journal editors should have mechanisms in place for addressing such disputes. They should be able to see the contract and have all disputing parties agree to any changes in authorship. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the manuscript should be retracted. Contractors should develop a publication plan and include in the contract stipulations ensuring transparent and unambiguous authorship on any publication ensuing from contracted work. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the Committee for Publication Ethics should update their guidance for authors to include advice regarding researchers involved in contracted work and how to resolve an authorship disputes around it.

Keywords:  Authorship; Contract; Payment; Publication ethics; Research integrity

Year:  2020        PMID: 31912431     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00173-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  8 in total

1.  Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3.

Authors:  Wendy P Battisti; Elizabeth Wager; Lise Baltzer; Dan Bridges; Angela Cairns; Christopher I Carswell; Leslie Citrome; James A Gurr; LaVerne A Mooney; B Jane Moore; Teresa Peña; Carol H Sanes-Miller; Keith Veitch; Karen L Woolley; Yvonne E Yarker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish.

Authors:  Samir Al-Adawi; Badreldin H Ali; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-01

3.  European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.

Authors:  Adam Jacobs; Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.

Authors:  Tobenna D Anekwe
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Publish together or perish: the increasing number of authors per article in academic journals is the consequence of a changing scientific culture. Some researchers define authorship quite loosely.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

Authors:  Ana Marusic; Elizabeth Wager; Ana Utrobicic; Hannah R Rothstein; Dario Sambunjak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Helle Krogh Johansen; Mette T Haahr; Douglas G Altman; An-Wen Chan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.