Literature DB >> 19222448

Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.

Tobenna D Anekwe1.   

Abstract

This paper focuses on medical ghostwriting in the United States. I argue that medical ghostwriting often involves plagiarism and, in those cases, can be treated as an act of research misconduct by both the federal government and research institutions. I also propose several anti-ghostwriting measures, including: 1) journals should implement guarantor policies so that researchers may be better held accountable for their work; 2) research institutions and the federal government should explicitly prohibit medical ghostwriting and outline appropriate penalties; and 3) a publicly available database should be created to record researchers' ethics violations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222448     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00705.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  5 in total

1.  Treat ghostwriting as misconduct.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Exorcising ghostwriting…. Ghostwriting could potentially have serious repercussions for science and should therefore be treated as research misconduct.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Plagiarism in research.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson; Stefan Eriksson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

4.  Can Authorship be Denied for Contract Work?

Authors:  Livia Puljak; Dario Sambunjak
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The Pursuit of Originality Makes Us All the Same!

Authors:  G M Sogi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.