Jodi T Bernstein1, Anthea K Christoforou1, Christine Mulligan1, Mary R L'Abbé2. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 5368, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Room 5368, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada. mary.labbe@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2016, legislation to restrict child-appealing marketing (M2K) of "unhealthy" foods and beverages ("foods") (i.e., foods that exceed roughly 5-10% of the Daily Value (DV) for total sugars, sodium, or saturated fats) was proposed in Canada. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between foods with on-pack M2K and excessive free sugars contents (≥ 10% calories from free sugars) and the potential for a 5% total sugars DV threshold to restrict M2K on these products. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the University of Toronto's Food Label Information Program (FLIP) 2013 database (n = 15,259, after exclusions). Odds ratios were used to determine the association between excess free sugars contents and presence of M2K, stratified by major food category. The proportion of products with excessive free sugars levels, or with M2K, that would be restricted from M2K if a 5% DV threshold for total sugars was implemented was also determined. RESULTS: 77.8% of foods with M2K had excess free sugars levels compared with 38.4% without M2K. M2K was more likely to be present on foods with excess free sugars levels in 8 of 14 food categories that contained products with M2K. A 5% DV threshold for total sugars would restrict M2K on 83% of foods with excess free sugars levels and on 75% of current foods that had M2K. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that foods with M2K are less healthy, particularly in regard to free sugars levels. This highlights the importance of ensuring policies aimed at supporting healthy dietary habits among children carefully consider free sugars levels.
OBJECTIVE: In 2016, legislation to restrict child-appealing marketing (M2K) of "unhealthy" foods and beverages ("foods") (i.e., foods that exceed roughly 5-10% of the Daily Value (DV) for total sugars, sodium, or saturated fats) was proposed in Canada. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between foods with on-pack M2K and excessive free sugars contents (≥ 10% calories from free sugars) and the potential for a 5% total sugars DV threshold to restrict M2K on these products. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the University of Toronto's Food Label Information Program (FLIP) 2013 database (n = 15,259, after exclusions). Odds ratios were used to determine the association between excess free sugars contents and presence of M2K, stratified by major food category. The proportion of products with excessive free sugars levels, or with M2K, that would be restricted from M2K if a 5% DV threshold for total sugars was implemented was also determined. RESULTS: 77.8% of foods with M2K had excess free sugars levels compared with 38.4% without M2K. M2K was more likely to be present on foods with excess free sugars levels in 8 of 14 food categories that contained products with M2K. A 5% DV threshold for total sugars would restrict M2K on 83% of foods with excess free sugars levels and on 75% of current foods that had M2K. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that foods with M2K are less healthy, particularly in regard to free sugars levels. This highlights the importance of ensuring policies aimed at supporting healthy dietary habits among children carefully consider free sugars levels.
Entities:
Keywords:
Food advertising; Food marketing; Marketing to children; Nutrient composition; Public health policy; Sugar
Authors: Kaye Mehta; Clare Phillips; Paul Ward; John Coveney; Elizabeth Handsley; Patricia Carter Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Emma J Boyland; Sarah Nolan; Bridget Kelly; Catrin Tudur-Smith; Andrew Jones; Jason Cg Halford; Eric Robinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: L N Signal; J Stanley; M Smith; M B Barr; T J Chambers; J Zhou; A Duane; C Gurrin; A F Smeaton; C McKerchar; A L Pearson; J Hoek; G L S Jenkin; C Ni Mhurchu Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-10-08 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Marta Beltrá; Keila Soares-Micoanski; Eva-Maria Navarrete-Muñoz; Ana B Ropero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.390