Literature DB >> 31911805

Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis: a case report and literature review.

Mongkhon Sompornrattanaphan1, Yanisa Jitvanitchakul2, Nat Malainual3, Chamard Wongsa1, Aree Jameekornrak1, Orathai Theankeaw1, Torpong Thongngarm1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral mite anaphylaxis (OMA) is a condition characterized by severe allergic reactions after ingesting food containing dust mite-contaminated flour. Physical exertion is recognized as a common trigger factor inducing anaphylaxis. The association of OMA with exercise-induced anaphylaxis has rarely been reported. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report a 29-year-old Thai woman who had dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis who tolerated the same bag of contaminated flour without exercise. A sample of contaminated cooking flour was examined under a light microscope. Living mites, Dermatophagoides farinae, were detected by a medical entomologist based on the morphology. We performed skin test to both mite-contaminated and newly opened Gogi® cooking flour, common aeroallergens, food allergens, and all other ingredients in the fried coconut rice cake 5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode. Specific IgE tests, using ImmunoCAP were also performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis may be misdiagnosed as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and should be suspected in patients with anaphylaxis linked to food intake and exercise, but who have no apparent evidence to the index food ingredients on allergy workup.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise-induced anaphylaxis; Food allergy; House dust mite; Oral mite anaphylaxis; Pancake syndrome

Year:  2020        PMID: 31911805      PMCID: PMC6945635          DOI: 10.1186/s13223-019-0399-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1710-1484            Impact factor:   3.406


Background

Oral mite anaphylaxis (OMA) is a condition characterized by severe allergic reactions after ingesting food containing dust mite-contaminated flour [1, 2]. Physical exertion is recognized as a common trigger factor inducing anaphylaxis [3, 4]. The association of OMA with exercise-induced anaphylaxis has rarely been reported [5, 6]. It may be misdiagnosed as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

Case presentation

We report a 29-year-old Thai woman who had dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis who tolerated the same bag of contaminated flour without exercise. She had moderate to severe, persistent allergic rhinitis since the age of 5, which was controlled by intranasal corticosteroid. Before the anaphylactic event occurred, she ate 10 pieces of fried coconut rice cake using mixed cooking flour (Gogi®) (Fig. 1a). Sixty minutes later, she began to jog along the road as a daily routine. Twenty minutes after jogging, she developed itchy palms and feet, followed by bilateral nasal congestion. She immediately sought medical attention for these symptoms. She then developed swollen eyelids, eye redness, watery rhinorrhea, chest tightness, and difficulty breathing.
Fig. 1

a Fried coconut rice cake. b Dermatophagoides farinae demonstrated by light microscopy in culprit cooking flour

a Fried coconut rice cake. b Dermatophagoides farinae demonstrated by light microscopy in culprit cooking flour In the emergency room, her vital signs were a blood pressure of 94/62 mmHg, a heart rate of 110 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 24 times per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Physical examination revealed angioedema of eyelids as well as generalized wheals and flares. The lungs were clear to auscultation. She was diagnosed with anaphylaxis, and food was suspected as a causative agent. Intramuscular epinephrine was administered. All symptoms improved on the first day. She had a biphasic reaction with mild recurrent eyelid angioedema the next day, which completely recovered within 24 h. She was generally well the day before the anaphylactic event. She denied taking medications and denied history of drug allergy. She could take ibuprofen and diclofenac without any adverse reaction. One week before the anaphylactic episode, she could tolerate 15 pieces of fried coconut rice cake using the same bag of mixed cooking flour which had been opened and stored at room temperature for 2 months. A sample of contaminated cooking flour was examined under a light microscope. Living mites, Dermatophagoides farinae, were detected by a medical entomologist based on the morphology (Fig. 1b). We performed skin test to both mite-contaminated and newly opened Gogi® cooking flour, common aeroallergens, food allergens, and all other ingredients in the fried coconut rice cake 5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode. Specific IgE tests, using ImmunoCAP (Phadia AB, Upsala, Sweden), were also performed. The results of allergologic tests are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Investigations performed in this patient (5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode)

Skin prick testaSpecific IgEc
Mite DP 30 × 15 mmCow’s milk: negativeMite DP 16.00 kUA/L
Mite DF 25 × 10 mmEgg yolk: negativeMite DF 15.50 kUA/L
Mite B. tropicalis 24 × 12 mmEgg white: negative
Shrimp: negativeWheat 0.03 kUA/L
Contaminated Gogi® flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline 14 × 12 mmCrab: negativeOmega-5 gliadin 0 kUA/L
Clam: negative
Newly opened Gogi® flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline: negativeOyster: negativeCow’s milk 0.02 kUA/L
Soybean: negative
Peanut: negativeEgg white 0 kUA/L
Kapok 10 × 8 mmWheat grain: negativeEgg yolk 0 kUA/L
Cat 5 × 4 mm
Dog 11 × 6 mmSticky rice flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline: negative
Mouse epithelium 5 × 4 mm
American cockroach 5 × 4 mm
German cockroach 4 × 4 mmPrick-to-prick testb
Coconut: negative
Bermuda 5 × 4 mm
Johnson 4 × 3 mmPositive control: 8 × 8 mm
Carelessweed 15 × 8 mmNegative control: negative
Acacia 5 × 4 mm
Penicillium: negative
Aspergillus: negative
Alternaria: negative

B. tropicalis, Blomia tropicalis; DP, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; DF, Dermatophagoides farinae; sIgE, specific immunoglobulin E; mm, millimeter; w/v, weight to volume ratio

aNormal saline and histamine (10 mg/mL) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. We did not perform a latex skin test due to the unavailability of a standard solution

bPrick-to-prick test by using fresh fruit

cSolid-phase immunoassay: ImmunoCAP

Investigations performed in this patient (5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode) B. tropicalis, Blomia tropicalis; DP, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; DF, Dermatophagoides farinae; sIgE, specific immunoglobulin E; mm, millimeter; w/v, weight to volume ratio aNormal saline and histamine (10 mg/mL) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. We did not perform a latex skin test due to the unavailability of a standard solution bPrick-to-prick test by using fresh fruit cSolid-phase immunoassay: ImmunoCAP

Discussion and conclusions

We report a case of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a Thai patient. Most reported OMA cases developed symptoms immediately after eating mite-contaminated foods, but they can occur during physical exercise after the oral ingestion of the mites [6]. A recent review included 145 OMA cases from various regions [1]. However, dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis has only been reported twice [5, 6]. To the best of our knowledge, our report is the third reported case of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. We did not perform mite-contaminated food combined with exercise challenges due to the safety issue. However, 1 week before the anaphylactic event, our patient could tolerate the same bag of mite-infested flour without exercise at home. An alternative explanation is house dust mite allergen level in the cooking flour could have increased with mite propagation [7]. However, the patient could tolerate 15 pieces of fried coconut rice cake without any reaction 1 week prior to the anaphylactic event compared with the 10 pieces associated with the event with exercise. Both the quantity of the food ingested and the 1-week interval of mite population increase should not have caused a significant increase in mite allergen ingestion associated with the anaphylactic event. This emphasizes the role of exercise as a cofactor to develop anaphylaxis in a patient who ingests mite-infested food. This reaction appears to be caused by heat-stable allergens, as cooking the flour does not seem to make a difference in terms of reactions in our case which is similar to the previous report [1]. OMA is associated with hypersensitivity to aspirin and NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). A high prevalence of house dust mite allergic rhinitis and/or asthma has been observed in OMA patients [2, 8]. Although our patient had house dust mite allergic rhinitis, she had no NSAIDs hypersensitivity, which is similar to the two previously reported cases (Table 2). Whether NSAIDs could also be a cofactor for anaphylaxis development without exercise after ingesting mite-infested food similar to FDEIA (Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis) has not been well established [3].
Table 2

Case reports of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis

Our caseAdachi [6]Sanchez-Borges [1]
Demographic data29-year-old female17-year-old male16-year-old female
CountryThailandJapanSpain
ComorbiditiesAllergic rhinitisNoneAllergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, squid allergy
NSAIDs hypersensitivity statusNoneNoneNone
Contaminated foodFried coconut rice cake (Mixed cooking flour)PancakePancakes
Type of exertionJoggingJoggingPlaying soccer
Food intake-to-exercise interval (min)609030
Exercise-to-reaction interval (min)20Several15
SymptomsBreathlessness, angioedema, urticaria, rhinitis, chest tightness, hypotensionAbdominal cramp, breathlessness, angioedema, urticaria, oxygen desaturationBreathlessness, angioedema
MitesDermatophagoides farinaeDermatophagoides farinaeSuidasia medanensis
The method used to identify mitesLight microscopyLight microscopyLight microscopy
Allergic evaluation

Skin test positive to DP, DF, B. tropicalis, Contaminated cooking flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline

Skin test negative to uncontaminated cooking flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline, wheat, oat, rye, barley, milk, egg, coconut (prick-prick)

sIgE positive to DP, DF, G. destructor, T. putrescentiae, A. siro

sIgE negative to wheat, gluten, squid

Skin test positive to DP, DF, B. tropicalis, A. siro, C. arcuatus, L. destructor, T. putrescientiae, Contaminated pancake mix extract 1/5 w/v in saline

Skin test negative to wheat, oat, rye, barley, milk, egg, Bermuda grass, ragweed

A. siro, Acarus siro; B. tropicalis, Blomia tropicalis; C. arcuatus, Chortoglyphus arcuatus; DP, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; DF, Dermatophagoides farinae; L. destructor, Lepidoglyphus destructor; S. medanensis, Suidasia medanensis; T. putrescentiae, Tyrophagus putrescentiae; NSAID, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; sIgE, specific immunoglobulin E; w/v, weight to volume ratio

Case reports of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis Skin test positive to DP, DF, B. tropicalis, Contaminated cooking flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline Skin test negative to uncontaminated cooking flour extract 1/5 w/v in saline, wheat, oat, rye, barley, milk, egg, coconut (prick-prick) sIgE positive to DP, DF, G. destructor, T. putrescentiae, A. siro sIgE negative to wheat, gluten, squid Skin test positive to DP, DF, B. tropicalis, A. siro, C. arcuatus, L. destructor, T. putrescientiae, Contaminated pancake mix extract 1/5 w/v in saline Skin test negative to wheat, oat, rye, barley, milk, egg, Bermuda grass, ragweed A. siro, Acarus siro; B. tropicalis, Blomia tropicalis; C. arcuatus, Chortoglyphus arcuatus; DP, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; DF, Dermatophagoides farinae; L. destructor, Lepidoglyphus destructor; S. medanensis, Suidasia medanensis; T. putrescentiae, Tyrophagus putrescentiae; NSAID, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; sIgE, specific immunoglobulin E; w/v, weight to volume ratio OMA is observed more frequently in geographical locations with high temperatures and relative humidity, favoring mite propagation. A series of OMA cases were reported from Venezuela, Spain, and Japan [1]. OMA is likely to be underreported in many countries with long periods of warm and humid weather, including Thailand. This condition is often overlooked and may be misdiagnosed as idiopathic anaphylaxis. The differential diagnoses include wheat allergy, allergy to hidden food allergens, food additives, and non-food allergens (e.g. drugs) [1]. In the case of suspicion of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, FDEIA should be excluded before making a diagnosis. OMA should be considered in mite allergic patients with food-induced allergic reaction who have no apparent allergy to the index food ingredients [6]. The diagnostic criteria for OMA were recently reviewed [1]. ‘Gogi®’ is a well-known brand of cooking flours in Thailand which is composed of 90% wheat, 6% tapioca, 3% baking powder, and 1% of trace component. The previous report demonstrated that dust mite infestation of flour was dependent on the presence of wheat and a high ambient temperature in tropical regions [9]. It is recommended that cooking flours be kept in the refrigerator using sealed glass containers or plastic bottles. In tropical regions, it is recommended that cooking flour be kept refrigerated for no longer than 6 weeks to prevent significant mite propagation [1].
  9 in total

1.  Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Mario Sánchez-Borges; Victor Iraola; Enrique Fernández-Caldas; Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett; Fernán Caballero-Fonseca
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Dust mite infestation of flour samples.

Authors:  F C Yi; J Y Chen; K K Chee; K Y Chua; B W Lee
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 3.  Hidden allergens and oral mite anaphylaxis: the pancake syndrome revisited.

Authors:  Mario Sánchez-Borges; Enrique Fernandez-Caldas
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-08

4.  Dust mite infestation in cooking flour: experimental observations and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Sasikarn Suesirisawad; Nat Malainual; Anchalee Tungtrongchitr; Pantipa Chatchatee; Narissara Suratannon; Jarungchit Ngamphaiboon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Cofactors and comorbidities in patients with aspirin/NSAID hypersensitivity.

Authors:  M Sánchez-Borges; F Caballero-Fonseca; A Capriles-Hulett
Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.667

6.  A case of mite-ingestion-associated exercise- induced anaphylaxis mimicking wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Yoko S Adachi; Toshiko Itazawa; Yoshie Okabe; Osamu Higuchi; Yasunori Ito; Yuichi Adachi
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.749

7.  Wheat-Dependent Cofactor-Augmented Anaphylaxis: A Prospective Study of Exercise, Aspirin, and Alcohol Efficacy as Cofactors.

Authors:  Morten J Christensen; Esben Eller; Charlotte G Mortz; Knut Brockow; Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-07-07

8.  International consensus (ICON) on: clinical consequences of mite hypersensitivity, a global problem.

Authors:  Mario Sánchez-Borges; Enrique Fernandez-Caldas; Wayne R Thomas; Martin D Chapman; Bee Wah Lee; Luis Caraballo; Nathalie Acevedo; Fook Tim Chew; Ignacio J Ansotegui; Leili Behrooz; Wanda Phipatanakul; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Demoly Pascal; Nelson Rosario; Motohiro Ebisawa; Mario Geller; Santiago Quirce; Susanne Vrtala; Rudolf Valenta; Markus Ollert; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Moises A Calderón; Charles S Barnes; Adnan Custovic; Suwat Benjaponpitak; Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.084

9.  Mite-induced inflammation: More than allergy.

Authors:  Mario Sánchez-Borges; Enrique Fernández-Caldas; Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett; Fernan Caballero-Fonseca
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2012-05-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.