Literature DB >> 31911507

Accuracy of a smartwatch based single-lead electrocardiogram device in detection of atrial fibrillation.

Kevin Rajakariar1, Anoop N Koshy2, Jithin K Sajeev1, Sachin Nair3, Louise Roberts1,3, Andrew W Teh4,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The AliveCor KardiaBand (KB) is an Food and Drug Administration-approved smartwatch-based cardiac rhythm monitor that records a lead-Intelligent ECG (iECG). Despite the appeal of wearable integrated ECG devices, there is a paucity of data evaluating their accuracy in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated whether a smartwatch-based device for AF detection is an accurate tool for diagnosing AF when compared with 12-lead ECG.
METHODS: A prospective, multi-centre, validation study was conducted in an inpatient hospital setting. The KB paired with a smartwatch, generated an automated diagnosis of AF or sinus rhythm (SR). This was compared with a 12-lead ECG performed immediately after iECG tracing. Where an unclassified or no-analysis tracing was generated, repeat iECG was performed.
RESULTS: 439 ECGs (iECGs (n=239) and 12-lead ECG (n=200)) were recorded in 200 patients (AF: n=38; SR: n=162) from three tertiary centres. Sensitivity and specificity using KB was 94.4% and 81.9% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 54.8% and negative predictive value of 98.4%. Agreement between 12-lead ECG and KB diagnosis was moderate when unclassified tracings were included (κ=0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.72). Combining the automated device diagnosis with blinded electrophysiologists (EP) interpretation of unclassified tracings improved overall agreement (EP1: κ=0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87; EP2: κ=0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.86).
CONCLUSION: The KB demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy when compared with a 12-lead ECG. Combining the automated device diagnosis with EP interpretation of unclassified tracings yielded improved accuracy. However, even with future improvements in automated algorithms, physician involvement will likely remain an essential component when exploring the utility of these devices for arrhythmia screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ Unique identifier: ACTRN12616001374459. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AliveCor; KardiaBand; atrial fibrillation; mobile health; smartwatch

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31911507     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  13 in total

Review 1.  Wearable Devices for Physical Monitoring of Heart: A Review.

Authors:  Guillermo Prieto-Avalos; Nancy Aracely Cruz-Ramos; Giner Alor-Hernández; José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes; Lisbeth Rodríguez-Mazahua; Luis Rolando Guarneros-Nolasco
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Diagnostic Utility of Smartwatch Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection - A Systematic Analysis.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Elbey; Daisy Young; Sri Harsha Kanuri; Krishna Akella; Ghulam Murtaza; Jalaj Garg; Donita Atkins; Sudha Bommana; Sharan Sharma; Mohit Turagam; Jayashree Pillarisetti; Peter Park; Rangarao Tummala; Alap Shah; Scott Koerber; Poojita Shivamurthy; Chandrasekhar Vasamreddy; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Estimating Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate from a Single Lead Electrocardiogram Using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Spectral Data Fusion.

Authors:  Iau-Quen Chung; Jen-Te Yu; Wei-Chi Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Can vital signs recorded in patients' homes aid decision making in emergency care? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Hamza; Jelmer Alsma; John Kellett; Mikkel Brabrand; Erika F Christensen; Tim Cooksley; Harm R Haak; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Hanneke Merten; Bo Schouten; Immo Weichert; Christian P Subbe
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-10

5.  Wearable technology to inform the prediction and diagnosis of cardiorespiratory events: a scoping review.

Authors:  Hamzeh Khundaqji; Wayne Hing; James Furness; Mike Climstein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Accuracy of Detecting Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wrist-Worn Wearable Technology.

Authors:  Seema Belani; Waseem Wahood; Patrick Hardigan; Andon N Placzek; Stephen Ely
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-12

Review 7.  Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Anastasia Xintarakou; Vasileios Sousonis; Dimitrios Asvestas; Panos E Vardas; Stylianos Tzeis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-01

8.  Smartwatch Electrocardiograms for Automated and Manual Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Analysis of Three Models.

Authors:  Saer Abu-Alrub; Marc Strik; F Daniel Ramirez; Nadir Moussaoui; Hugo Pierre Racine; Hugo Marchand; Samuel Buliard; Michel Haïssaguerre; Sylvain Ploux; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-04

9.  Intelligent Algorithm-Based Electrocardiography to Predict Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Elderly.

Authors:  Tao Feng; Zhihua Deng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  The Auxiliary Diagnostic Value of a Novel Wearable Electrocardiogram-Recording System for Arrhythmia Detection: Diagnostic Trial.

Authors:  Shaomin Zhang; Hong Xian; Yi Chen; Yue Liao; Nan Zhang; Xinyu Guo; Ming Yang; Jinhui Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.