H Matthew Lehrer1, Mary A Steinhardt2, Susan K Dubois3, Mark L Laudenslager4. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States. Electronic address: lehrerhm@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States. 3. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychological resilience is considered to protect against detrimental effects of perceived stress on cardiovascular and metabolic health, but few studies have tested biological mechanisms underlying these relationships. PURPOSE: This study examined whether psychological resilience moderated the indirect association of perceived stress with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) severity via hair cortisol concentration (HCC), a retrospective index of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activity. METHOD: Participants included 228 adults (73 White, 86 Hispanic, 69 African American; mean age 45.29 years; 68% females). Participants completed questionnaires assessing perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale). The first 3 cm of scalp-near hair were analyzed for cortisol concentration using enzyme-linked immunoassay analysis. Cardiometabolic risk factors including blood glucose, lipids, blood pressure, and waist circumference were assessed, from which a sex- and race/ethnicity-specific continuous MetS severity score was calculated. A moderated mediation model was tested using path analysis. RESULTS: Psychological resilience moderated the association of perceived stress with HCC (R2 change for interaction = 0.014, p = 0.043), such that the association of perceived stress and HCC decreased as resilience scores increased. Resilience also moderated the indirect association of perceived stress with MetS severity via HCC (b = -0.039, 95% CI [-0.001; -0.100]), such that HCC mediated the association of greater perceived stress with greater MetS severity only for individuals reporting Brief Resilience Scale scores 3 or below (range: 1.17-5.00). Psychological resilience was also associated with lower MetS severity (β = -0.227, p = 0.014) independent of perceived stress and HCC. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that psychological resilience may serve as both a stress buffer and as a direct determinant of cardiometabolic health. These results extend literature on psychological resilience to measures of retrospective HPA axis function and MetS severity in a diverse sample.
BACKGROUND: Psychological resilience is considered to protect against detrimental effects of perceived stress on cardiovascular and metabolic health, but few studies have tested biological mechanisms underlying these relationships. PURPOSE: This study examined whether psychological resilience moderated the indirect association of perceived stress with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) severity via hair cortisol concentration (HCC), a retrospective index of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activity. METHOD:Participants included 228 adults (73 White, 86 Hispanic, 69 African American; mean age 45.29 years; 68% females). Participants completed questionnaires assessing perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale). The first 3 cm of scalp-near hair were analyzed for cortisol concentration using enzyme-linked immunoassay analysis. Cardiometabolic risk factors including blood glucose, lipids, blood pressure, and waist circumference were assessed, from which a sex- and race/ethnicity-specific continuous MetS severity score was calculated. A moderated mediation model was tested using path analysis. RESULTS: Psychological resilience moderated the association of perceived stress with HCC (R2 change for interaction = 0.014, p = 0.043), such that the association of perceived stress and HCC decreased as resilience scores increased. Resilience also moderated the indirect association of perceived stress with MetS severity via HCC (b = -0.039, 95% CI [-0.001; -0.100]), such that HCC mediated the association of greater perceived stress with greater MetS severity only for individuals reporting Brief Resilience Scale scores 3 or below (range: 1.17-5.00). Psychological resilience was also associated with lower MetS severity (β = -0.227, p = 0.014) independent of perceived stress and HCC. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that psychological resilience may serve as both a stress buffer and as a direct determinant of cardiometabolic health. These results extend literature on psychological resilience to measures of retrospective HPA axis function and MetS severity in a diverse sample.
Authors: A S DeSantis; A V DiezRoux; A Hajat; S H Golden; N S Jenny; B N Sanchez; S Shea; T E Seeman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M Camille Hoffman; Kimberly D'Anna-Hernandez; Patrick Benitez; Randal G Ross; Mark L Laudenslager Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: H Matthew Lehrer; Susan K Dubois; Julie Maslowsky; Mark L Laudenslager; Mary A Steinhardt Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: S H Park; B D Naliboff; W Shih; A P Presson; E J Videlock; T Ju; L Kilpatrick; A Gupta; E A Mayer; L Chang Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Ewa Latour; Jarosław Arlet; Emilia Latour; Marianna Latour; Piotr Basta; Anna Skarpańska-Stejnborn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Sun Jae Jung; Ye Jin Jeon; Karmel W Choi; Ji Su Yang; Jeong-Ho Chae; Karestan C Koenen; Hyeon Chang Kim Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Anwal Ghulam; Marialaura Bonaccio; Simona Costanzo; Alessandro Gialluisi; Federica Santonastaso; Augusto Di Castelnuovo; Chiara Cerletti; Maria Benedetta Donati; Giovanni de Gaetano; Francesco Gianfagna; Licia Iacoviello Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Robert P Hirten; Matteo Danieletto; Lewis Tomalin; Katie Hyewon Choi; Micol Zweig; Eddye Golden; Sparshdeep Kaur; Drew Helmus; Anthony Biello; Renata Pyzik; Claudia Calcagno; Robert Freeman; Bruce E Sands; Dennis Charney; Erwin P Bottinger; James W Murrough; Laurie Keefer; Mayte Suarez-Farinas; Girish N Nadkarni; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 5.428