David Akhavan1, Paul Yazaki2, Dave Yamauchi3, Jennifer Simpson4, Paul H Frankel5, James Bading2, David Colcher2, Kofi Poku2, Yi-Jen Chen1, Dean Lim4, Mihaela Cristea4, Anna Wu2, John Shively2, Jeffrey Y C Wong1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California. 2. Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, California. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California. 5. Department of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Abstract
Background: M5A is a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) The purpose of this first in human phase I dose-escalation trial was to characterize the toxicities and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of yttrium-90 (90Y)-DOTA-M5A as a single agent and in combination with gemcitabine (gem). Methods: Patients with advanced metastatic CEA-producing malignancies who had progressed on standard therapies were first administered indium-111 (111In)-DOTA-M5A. If tumor targeting was observed, the patient then received the therapy dose of 90Y-DOTA-M5A. Serial scans, blood sampling, and 24 h urine collections were then performed to estimate radiation doses to organs and total body. Assays for human antihuman antibody (HAHA) responses were performed out to 6 months. Results: Of the 18 patients who received 111In-DOTA-M5A, 16 received 90Y-DOTA-M5A therapy; 1 patient at 14 mCi/m2 with gem (150 mg/m2 days 1and 3), 3 patients at 12 mCi/m2 with gem, 6 patients at 12 mCi/m2 without gem, and 6 at 10 mCi/m2 without gem. Prolonged cytopenias resulted in discontinuation of dose escalation with gemcitabine. A single agent MTD of 10 mCi/m2 was established based on dose-limiting hematopoietic toxicities. HAHA immune response was identified in 2 of 16 patients (12.5%). Stable disease at 3 months was seen in 10 patients and 2 patients demonstrated an 88% and 64% decrease in CEA back to normal levels. In 2 patients 111In-DOTA-M5A imaging revealed previously unknown brain metastases. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential utility of the 90Y-DOTA-M5A anti-CEA mAb as a therapeutic antibody. There is decreased immunogenicity compared with murine and chimeric mAbs, allowing for the potential of multiple administrations. Combined modality therapy approaches incorporating this agent should continue to be evaluated.
Background: M5A is a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) The purpose of this first in human phase I dose-escalation trial was to characterize the toxicities and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of yttrium-90 (90Y)-DOTA-M5A as a single agent and in combination with gemcitabine (gem). Methods:Patients with advanced metastatic CEA-producing malignancies who had progressed on standard therapies were first administered indium-111 (111In)-DOTA-M5A. If tumor targeting was observed, the patient then received the therapy dose of 90Y-DOTA-M5A. Serial scans, blood sampling, and 24 h urine collections were then performed to estimate radiation doses to organs and total body. Assays for human antihuman antibody (HAHA) responses were performed out to 6 months. Results: Of the 18 patients who received 111In-DOTA-M5A, 16 received 90Y-DOTA-M5A therapy; 1 patient at 14 mCi/m2 with gem (150 mg/m2 days 1and 3), 3 patients at 12 mCi/m2 with gem, 6 patients at 12 mCi/m2 without gem, and 6 at 10 mCi/m2 without gem. Prolonged cytopenias resulted in discontinuation of dose escalation with gemcitabine. A single agent MTD of 10 mCi/m2 was established based on dose-limiting hematopoietic toxicities. HAHA immune response was identified in 2 of 16 patients (12.5%). Stable disease at 3 months was seen in 10 patients and 2 patients demonstrated an 88% and 64% decrease in CEA back to normal levels. In 2 patients111In-DOTA-M5A imaging revealed previously unknown brain metastases. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential utility of the 90Y-DOTA-M5A anti-CEA mAb as a therapeutic antibody. There is decreased immunogenicity compared with murine and chimeric mAbs, allowing for the potential of multiple administrations. Combined modality therapy approaches incorporating this agent should continue to be evaluated.
Authors: Sandra J Horning; Anas Younes; Vinay Jain; Stewart Kroll; Jennifer Lucas; Donald Podoloff; Michael Goris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Neumaier; L Shively; F S Chen; F J Gaida; C Ilgen; R J Paxton; J E Shively; A D Riggs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1990-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Vincent J Picozzi; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Maeve A Lowery; Allyson J Ocean; Edith P Mitchel; Bert H O'Neil; Michael J Guarino; Paul R Conkling; Steven J Cohen; Nathan Bahary; Richard C Frank; Tomislav Dragovich; Benjamin B Bridges; Fadi S Braiteh; Alexander N Starodub; Fa-Chyi Lee; Thomas E Gribbin; Donald A Richards; Marie Lee; Ronald L Korn; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Stanley J Goldsmith; Charles M Intenzo; Arif Sheikh; Timothy C Manzone; Heather Horne; Robert M Sharkey; William A Wegener; Eileen M O'Reilly; David M Goldenberg; Daniel D Von Hoff Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: D Z Chu; D M Yamauchi; L E Williams; A Liu; S Wilczynski; A M Wu; J E Shively; J H Doroshow; A A Raubitschek Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R F Meredith; A J Bueschen; M B Khazaeli; W E Plott; W E Grizzle; R H Wheeler; J Schlom; C D Russell; T Liu; A F LoBuglio Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paul J Yazaki; Mark A Sherman; John E Shively; David Ikle; Lawrence E Williams; Jeffrey Y C Wong; David Colcher; Anna M Wu; Andrew A Raubitschek Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2004-08-17 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Stephen Shibata; Andrew Raubitschek; Lucille Leong; Marianna Koczywas; Lawrence Williams; Jiping Zhan; Jeffrey Y C Wong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R F Meredith; M B Khazaeli; W E Plott; S A Spencer; R H Wheeler; L W Brady; D V Woo; A F LoBuglio Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R F Meredith; M B Khazaeli; W E Plott; M N Saleh; T Liu; L F Allen; C D Russell; R A Orr; D Colcher; J Schlom Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher S Chandler; Meghan M Bell; Sebastian K Chung; Darren R Veach; Edward K Fung; Blesida Punzalan; Daniela Burnes Vargas; Mitesh Patel; Hong Xu; Hong-Fen Guo; Brian H Santich; Pat B Zanzonico; Sébastien Monette; Garrett M Nash; Andrea Cercek; Achim Jungbluth; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Nai Kong V Cheung; Steven M Larson; Sarah M Cheal Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 6.009
Authors: Tabassom Mohajershojai; Preeti Jha; Anna Boström; Fredrik Y Frejd; Paul J Yazaki; Marika Nestor Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 5.738