Catherine B Jensen1, Megan C Saucke2, David O Francis2,3, Corrine I Voils2, Susan C Pitt2,4. 1. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 4. Division of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: The optimal management for patients with small, low-risk thyroid cancer is often debated. We aimed to characterize the attitudes and beliefs of providers and patients about management of small, low-risk thyroid cancer and how they relate to overtreatment. Methods: We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with surgeons (n = 12), endocrinologists (n = 12), and patients with <1.5 cm papillary thyroid cancer (n = 10). Interviews probed about diagnosis and treatment decision-making, including nonoperative options. We used thematic analysis to identify themes related to overtreatment and created concept diagrams to map observed relationships between themes. Results: When providers discussed management of small, low-risk thyroid cancer, most felt that overtreatment was a problem, and some brought it up without prompting. Providers often believed that overtreatment results from overdiagnosis and relayed how the process commonly starts with incidental discovery of a thyroid nodule on imaging. Providers viewed biopsy of the nodule as a reflexive or habitual action. They ascribed inappropriate biopsy to lack of adherence to or knowledge of guidelines, radiologist recommendations, and the desire of patients and physicians to minimize diagnostic uncertainty. Providers described subsequent cancer diagnosis as an event that "opens Pandora's box" and often provokes a strong instinctive, culturally rooted need to proceed with surgery-specifically total thyroidectomy. Consequently, most providers felt that it is easier to prevent overdiagnosis than overtreatment and recommended strategies such as improving guideline adherence, resetting patients' expectations, and engaging the media. In contrast, patients did not bring up or openly discuss overtreatment or overdiagnosis. Some patients described the seemingly automatic process from an incidental finding to surgery. Their statements confirmed that the "need to know" was a major motivation for biopsying their nodule. Patients felt that once they had a cancer diagnosis, surgery was a foregone conclusion. Patients admitted their knowledge about thyroid nodules and cancer was low, leaving room for education about the need for biopsy and less extensive treatment options. Conclusions: Surgeons' and endocrinologists' attitudes and beliefs about overtreatment focus on the automaticity of overdiagnosis. Both patients and providers are cognizant of the cascade of clinical events that propel patients from incidental discovery of a thyroid nodule to surgery.
Introduction: The optimal management for patients with small, low-risk thyroid cancer is often debated. We aimed to characterize the attitudes and beliefs of providers and patients about management of small, low-risk thyroid cancer and how they relate to overtreatment. Methods: We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with surgeons (n = 12), endocrinologists (n = 12), and patients with <1.5 cm papillary thyroid cancer (n = 10). Interviews probed about diagnosis and treatment decision-making, including nonoperative options. We used thematic analysis to identify themes related to overtreatment and created concept diagrams to map observed relationships between themes. Results: When providers discussed management of small, low-risk thyroid cancer, most felt that overtreatment was a problem, and some brought it up without prompting. Providers often believed that overtreatment results from overdiagnosis and relayed how the process commonly starts with incidental discovery of a thyroid nodule on imaging. Providers viewed biopsy of the nodule as a reflexive or habitual action. They ascribed inappropriate biopsy to lack of adherence to or knowledge of guidelines, radiologist recommendations, and the desire of patients and physicians to minimize diagnostic uncertainty. Providers described subsequent cancer diagnosis as an event that "opens Pandora's box" and often provokes a strong instinctive, culturally rooted need to proceed with surgery-specifically total thyroidectomy. Consequently, most providers felt that it is easier to prevent overdiagnosis than overtreatment and recommended strategies such as improving guideline adherence, resetting patients' expectations, and engaging the media. In contrast, patients did not bring up or openly discuss overtreatment or overdiagnosis. Some patients described the seemingly automatic process from an incidental finding to surgery. Their statements confirmed that the "need to know" was a major motivation for biopsying their nodule. Patients felt that once they had a cancer diagnosis, surgery was a foregone conclusion. Patients admitted their knowledge about thyroid nodules and cancer was low, leaving room for education about the need for biopsy and less extensive treatment options. Conclusions: Surgeons' and endocrinologists' attitudes and beliefs about overtreatment focus on the automaticity of overdiagnosis. Both patients and providers are cognizant of the cascade of clinical events that propel patients from incidental discovery of a thyroid nodule to surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
low-risk; overdiagnosis; overtreatment; qualitative; thyroid cancer
Authors: Louise Davies; Luc G T Morris; Megan Haymart; Amy Y Chen; David Goldenberg; John Morris; Jennifer B Ogilvie; David J Terris; James Netterville; Richard J Wong; Gregory Randolph Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Brooke Nickel; Alexandra Barratt; Kevin McGeechan; Juan P Brito; Ray Moynihan; Kirsten Howard; Kirsten McCaffery Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Robert J Volk; Stephanie L McFall; Scott B Cantor; Theresa L Byrd; Yen-Chi L Le; Deborah A Kuban; Patricia Dolan Mullen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Charlotte Vrinten; Lesley M McGregor; Małgorzata Heinrich; Christian von Wagner; Jo Waller; Jane Wardle; Georgia B Black Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: L Dal Maso; C Panato; A De Paoli; V Mattioli; D Serraino; R Elisei; G Zoppini; C Gobitti; E Borsatti; E Di Felice; F Falcini; S Ferretti; S Francisci; P Giorgi Rossi; S Guzzinati; G Mazzoleni; D Pierannunzio; S Piffer; S Vaccarella; M Vicentini; M Zorzi; S Franceschi; U Fedeli Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Alexandria D McDow; Benjamin R Roman; Megan C Saucke; Catherine B Jensen; Nick Zaborek; Jamia Linn Jennings; Louise Davies; Juan P Brito; Susan C Pitt Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 3.125
Authors: Susan C Pitt; Megan C Saucke; Elizabeth M Wendt; David F Schneider; Jason Orne; Cameron L Macdonald; Nadine P Connor; Rebecca S Sippel Journal: Thyroid Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.568