Literature DB >> 31908633

Profiling of the germline mutation BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs in a large cohort of Han Chinese breast cancer.

Yu Wu1,2, Huanhuan Zhang3, Xiaoling Weng3,4, Honglian Wang3, Qinghua Zhou5, Ying Wu5, Yi Shen5, Zhen Hu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a one of the malignant carcinomas partially caused by genetic risk factors. Germline BRCA1 gene mutations are reportedly associated with breast cancers. Identification of BRCA1 mutations greatly improves the preventive strategies and management of breast cancer. The aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of the deleterious BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in breast carcinomas, as well as the correlation between p.Ile1845fs variant with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 23,481 clinically high-risk patients with breast cancer and 6489 healthy controls were recruited for p.Ile1845fs variant sequencing (either sanger or next generation sequencing). We identified 94 breast cancer patients (0.40%, 94/23481) as well as 11 healthy controls (0.17%, 11/6489) carried p.Ile1845fs variant. BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed a higher frequency in patients with TNBC molecular typing (20.21%, 19/94) and family history (37.23%, 35/94) compared with non-carriers (P = 3.62E-6 and 0.034, respectively). According to our data, we advanced the frequency of p.Ile1845fs variant and we confirmed that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.26-4.89, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was a frequently pathogenic mutation in breast cancer in Han Chinese women and our data may be helpful for diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; Breast cancer; Clinicopathological; P.Ile1845fs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31908633      PMCID: PMC6937991          DOI: 10.1186/s41065-019-0115-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hereditas        ISSN: 0018-0661            Impact factor:   3.271


Background

Breast cancer is a leading health concern among women worldwide, with approximately 252,710 women newly diagnosed cases occurring every year in the world [1, 2]. In the past few years, the rates of mortality have decreased as a result of recent advancements in the understanding of breast cancer biology. However, breast cancer still keeps up with the leading cause of death in women and metastases at distant sites are still responsible for majority of the cancer death [3]. The genetic architecture of breast cancer involves germline pathogenic variants in high and moderate-risk genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. Breast cancers is the most frequent cancer in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers. Recently, studies showed BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants carriers have a 72 and 69% cumulative risk up to age 80, respectively [4, 5]. Therefore, identifying more prognostic markers is required to screen high risk patients and it is significant for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) is a large gene with 23 exons located on chromosome 17q12.21. It plays as a tumor suppressor that is essential for maintenance of genome stability and DNA repair [6]. The most common mutation types of BRCA1 are small insertion/deletion frameshift, nonsynonymous truncation, and splice-site alterations [7, 8]. Breast cancer risk based on BRCA1 mutation carrier status will be greatly increased. Understanding the mutational spectra of BRCA1 gene will help carriers to personalize the prevention strategies, including prophylactic mastectomy and salpingo-oopherectomy [9, 10]. The genetic testing for these mutations would directly affect the decisions of carriers and their family members. In sporadic breast cancer, the frequency and relevance of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant has not been elucidated completely. Therefore, we decided that a comprehensive investigation would be useful to clarify this mutation profiling and prognostic significance in sporadic breast cancer in Han Chinese. In the present study, the frequency of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs mutation and the relationship between the mutation, clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Material and methods

A total of 23,481 clinically high-risk breast cancer patients and 6489 healthy controls were recruited at 19 clinical centers in 11 Chinese provinces between 2012 to 2018. Clinicopathological features of the patients, including age, ethnicity, menopausal status, type of tumor, disease stage, lymph nodes and tumor size, were collected. Family history is defined that the breast cancer patients had one or more cancer patients (any kind of cancer) in the first-, second-, or third-degree relatives. The control subjects were hospital-based unrelated healthy individuals with no breast cancer or any other cancers. The written informed consents were signed by all participants. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of all the hospitals involved. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood specimens using the QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen). DNA were amplified by multiplex-amplicon PCR and libraries were then prepared using protocols recommended by Illumina. The validated DNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina sequencing system (Illumina HiSeq X10). Read pairs (fastq data) generated from the sequencing system were aligned with reference sequences (BRCA1: NM_007300.3) and processed for variant calling. The pathogenic variant p.Ile1845fs was validated by sanger sequencing, and we successfully validated the mutation results with 100% concordance. The statistical analysis were performed using the R program (http://www.r-project.org/). Chi Square test or the Fisher exact test were used to analyze the two-group comparisons and the OR and the corresponding 95% CI were estimated. All data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

We analyzed the BRCA1 pathogenic variant, p.Ile1845fs, with breast cancer risk in 23,481 invasive breast cancer cases (46.24 ± 20.11 years) and age-matched 6489 controls (47.33 ± 13.46 years). A total of 94 p.Ile1845fs mutations were identified in 23,481 (0.40%) unselected breast cancer patients and 11 unaffected controls carried p.Ile1845fs mutation (0.17%, 11/6489). In the overall analysis, BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed a higher frequency in breast cancer cases (0.40%) than in controls (0.17%) with a greater than two-fold increased breast cancer risk (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.12–5.34, P = 0.034, Table 1).
Table 1

BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in unselected breast cancer cases and controls

GroupsCarriersNon-carriersFreq (%)OR95%CIP
Controls1164890.172.361.26–4.890.004
Cases9423,4810.40

Bold: P<0.05

BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in unselected breast cancer cases and controls Bold: P<0.05 We summarized the clinicopathogical characteristics of the 94 patients with BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant and 23,387 non-carriers in Table 2. The mean age of these breast cancer patients was 46.16 years (sd = 9.80). The mean age of these non-carriers was 46.25 years (sd = 15.52). Among the 94 BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers, 44 (46.81%) patients were diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER) negative status. 46 (48.94%) patients were detected with progesterone receptor (PR) negative status. 35 (37.23%) patients presented with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative status. 6 (6.38%) patients were classified with Luminal-A molecular typing. 26 (27.66%) patients were classified with Luminal-B molecular typing. 12 (12.77%) patients were classified with HER2 overexpression molecular typing. 19 (20.21%) patients were classified with TNBC (Triple-negative breast cancer) molecular typing. 35 (37.23%) patients had family history. TNBC molecular typing was more frequent in mutation carriers compared with non-carriers (P = 3.62E-6). BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers were more likely to have family history of cancer (P = 0.034).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers and non-carriers in this study

VariablesCarriersNon-carriersP
Age at diagnosis0.19
  ≤ 50526943
  > 50224223
 na2012,221
ER status2.21E-08
 Positive2411,849
 Negative445622
 na265916
PR status1.29E-06
 Positive2110,630
 Negative466794
 na275963
HER2 status0.011
 Positive3110,264
 Negative356069
 na287054
Molecular typing3.62E-06
 Luminal-A63726
 Luminal-B268061
 HER2 overexpression122805
 TNBC191743
 na317052
Family history
 Yes3541840.034
 No418183
 na1811,020
 Total9423,38723,481

Bold: P<0.05

Clinical characteristics of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers and non-carriers in this study Bold: P<0.05

Discussion

In this study we investigated the profiling of the BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in Han Chinese breast cancer. We conducted gene sequencing studies in 23,481 unselected breast cancer cases and 6489 controls and confirmed that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.26–4.89, P = 0.004). BRCA1 is a key factor in the DNA double-strand break repair of other genes that induce human cancers [11, 12]. It plays crucial roles in chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle regulation, and activating DNA repair in response to cellular stress [13, 14]. BRCA1 encodes a 1884-amino-acid-long nuclear protein (NP_009231.2) and is expressed in various tissues including breast tissues. There are more than 1600 known variants in BRCA1 and its pathogenic variants increase the risks of breast cancer [15, 16]. Our genetic data suggested that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs was a risk factor for breast cancer with statistically significant OR of 2.36. Clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed 44 (46.81%) patients were diagnosed with ER negative status, 46 (48.94%) with PR negative status and 35 (37.23%) with HER2 negative status. Based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, we found 6 (6.38%) Luminal-A molecular typing patients and 26 (27.66%) Luminal-B molecular typing patients. Luminal A and Luminal B share similarities in prognosis, while Luminal B have lower expression of hormone receptors, higher expression of proliferation markers, and higher histologic grade than luminal A [17, 18]. Triple-negative breast cancer is defined by aggressive clinical behavior and occurs in 10–15% of sporadic breast cancers [19, 20]. There were 19 (20.21%) TNBC molecular typing patients carried p.Ile1845fs variant. Family history of breast or ovarian cancer is a high risk factor for breast cancer and genetic testing is recommend for these patients [21]. Among total 94 BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers, 35 (37.23%) patients had family history. Recently, more studies focus on effective detection of informative biomarkers for advanced development of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in breast cancer. Arason A et al. showed the profiling of BRCA1 c.4096 + 3A > G and found 8 heterozygous carriers (0.44%) in 1820 unselected breast cancer cases, and 3 (0.15%) in 1968 healthy controls [22]. BRCA1: p.Val1833Met variant was genotyped among 3531 breast cancer patients and 1558 healthy controls using sanger and next generation sequencing, with 27 (0.77%, 27/3531) carriers in cases while no carriers in controls [23]. Our study accord with a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation: p.Ile1845fs and identified 94 carriers (0.40%) in 23,481 breast cancer patients, and 11 (0.17%, 11/6489) in controls. Our findings add to the current knowledge of BRCA1, which will be of use in clinical genetic counselling. In summary, we described the frequency of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs mutation and its clinical aspects in our cohort. We have found that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant is associated with risk of breast cancer. Further genetic studies and meta-analyses are warranted to derive more precise risk estimates for BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant. And such carriers should be counselled accordingly, with clinical recommendations and personalized risk-reductionprimary and secondary cancer prevention strategies.
  23 in total

1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Kathleen I Pritchard; Wedad M Hanna; Harriet K Kahn; Carol A Sawka; Lavina A Lickley; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  BRCA1 mislocalization leads to aberrant DNA damage response in heterozygous ABRAXAS1 mutation carrier cells.

Authors:  Muthiah Bose; Juliane Sachsenweger; Niina Laurila; Ann Christin Parplys; Jonas Willmann; Johannes Jungwirth; Marco Groth; Katrin Rapakko; Pentti Nieminen; Thomas W P Friedl; Lisa Heiserich; Felix Meyer; Hanna Tuppurainen; Hellevi Peltoketo; Heli Nevanlinna; Katri Pylkäs; Kerstin Borgmann; Lisa Wiesmüller; Robert Winqvist; Helmut Pospiech
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Felipe Ades; Dimitrios Zardavas; Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic; Lina Pugliano; Debora Fumagalli; Evandro de Azambuja; Giuseppe Viale; Christos Sotiriou; Martine Piccart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Structure-Guided Synthesis and Evaluation of Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions of BRCA1 tBRCT Domain.

Authors:  Vadiraj Kurdekar; Saranya Giridharan; Jasti Subbarao; Mamatha B Nijaguna; Jayaprakash Periasamy; Sanjana Boggaram; Amol V Shivange; Gayathri Sadasivam; Muralidhara Padigaru; Vijay Potluri; Ashok R Venkitaraman; Kavitha Bharatham
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.

Authors:  Carolyn D Runowicz; Corinne R Leach; N Lynn Henry; Karen S Henry; Heather T Mackey; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado; Rachel S Cannady; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Stephen B Edge; Linda A Jacobs; Arti Hurria; Lawrence B Marks; Samuel J LaMonte; Ellen Warner; Gary H Lyman; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G Variant Displays Classical Characteristics of Pathogenic BRCA1 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers, But Still Allows Homozygous Viability.

Authors:  Adalgeir Arason; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Gudrun Johannesdottir; Oskar Th Johannsson; Bylgja Hilmarsdottir; Inga Reynisdottir; Rosa B Barkardottir
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Prolyl hydroxylase substrate adenylosuccinate lyase is an oncogenic driver in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Giada Zurlo; Xijuan Liu; Mamoru Takada; Cheng Fan; Jeremy M Simon; Travis S Ptacek; Javier Rodriguez; Alex von Kriegsheim; Juan Liu; Jason W Locasale; Adam Robinson; Jing Zhang; Jessica M Holler; Baek Kim; Marie Zikánová; Jörgen Bierau; Ling Xie; Xian Chen; Mingjie Li; Charles M Perou; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Structure of BRCA1-BRCT/Abraxas Complex Reveals Phosphorylation-Dependent BRCT Dimerization at DNA Damage Sites.

Authors:  Qian Wu; Atanu Paul; Dan Su; Shahid Mehmood; Tzeh Keong Foo; Takashi Ochi; Emma L Bunting; Bing Xia; Carol V Robinson; Bin Wang; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  BRCA1/BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Breast Cancer: Treatment and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Anbok Lee; Byung In Moon; Tae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impacts of LOC105371267 Variants on Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Northern Chinese Han Females: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Linna Peng; Congmei Huang; Shishi Xing; Dandan Li; Chunjuan He; Yongjun He; Wei Yang; Tianbo Jin; Li Wang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.375

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.