| Literature DB >> 31908583 |
Mohd Ulul Ilmie Ahmad Nazri1, Izwandy Idris2, Othman Ross2, Wan Iryani Wan Ismail1.
Abstract
The incidence of neurodegenerative diseases is directly proportional to age. The prevalence of non-communicable diseases, for example, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, is expected to rise in the coming years. Understanding the etiopathology of these diseases is a crucial step that needs to be taken to develop drugs for their treatment. Animal models are being increasingly used to expand the knowledge and understanding on neurodegenerative diseases. Marine worms, known as polychaetes (phylum Annelida), which are abundantly and frequently found in benthic environments, possess a simple yet complete nervous system (including a true brain that is centralised and specialised) compared to other annelids. Hence, polychaetes can potentially be the next candidate for a nerve disease model. The ability to activate the entire nervous system regeneration (NSR) is among the remarkable features of many polychaetes species. However, the information on NSR in polychaetes and how it can potentially model neurodegenerative diseases in humans is still lacking. By exploring such studies, we may eventually be able to circumvent the developmental constraints that limit NSR in the human nervous system. This article is intended to briefly review responsible mechanisms and signalling pathways of NSR in marine polychaetes and to make a comparison with other established models of neurodegenerative disease. © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Parkinson’s disease; brain signalling pathway; marine polychaete; nervous system regeneration; neurodegenerative disease model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31908583 PMCID: PMC6939724 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.6.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays J Med Sci ISSN: 1394-195X
Figure 1General outer anatomy of the anterior part of polychaete. Note that every chaetiger (segment) has parapodium with protruding chaetae use locomotion or defence
Figure 2Schematic drawing of polychaete nervous system. a) The general organisation consists of brain, circumpharyngeal connectives symmetrically located and ladder-like VNC (perforated box). Aligned along the nerve cord is a pair of segmental ganglia connected by commissure and connected to other ganglia by connectives. b) The cephalic nerve organisation (22) consists of mainly nerves and ganglia
Notes: drcc = dorsal root; vrcc = ventral root; dcdr and vcdr = dorsal and ventral commissures of dorsal root; dcvr and vcvr = dorsal and ventral commissures of ventral root; gHa = Hamaker’s ganglia; gHo = Homlgren’s ganglia; cc = circumpharyngeal connective
Figure 3Comparison of human and polychaete nervous systems. In polychaete, brain is considered as a pair of ganglia as other pairs in each segment and responsible for the activities for the respective segments. Ganglia in human are located at various places and functioning in different roles
Polychaete species capable to regenerate anterior region
| Family species | Reference |
|---|---|
| Aeolosomatidae | |
| | Herlant-Meewis ( |
| Amphinomidae | |
| | Muller et al. ( |
| Chaetopteridae | |
| | Berrill ( |
| Cirratulidae | |
| | Weidhase et al. ( |
| | Weidhase et al. ( |
| Dorvilleidae | |
| | Muller and Henning ( |
| Eunicidae | |
| | Bely’s personal communication with Gambi MC |
| | Coulon et al. ( |
| Maldanidae | |
| | Moment ( |
| | Clavier ( |
| | Wilson ( |
| Onuphidae | |
| | Ilmie, unpublished data |
| | Pires et al. ( |
| Oweniidae | |
| | Dupin et al. ( |
| Phyllodocidae | |
| | Olive ( |
| Sabellidae | |
| | Berrill ( |
| | Berrill ( |
| | Berrill ( |
| Serpulidae | |
| | Okada ( |
| Spionidae | |
| Amphipolydora vestalis | Gibson and Paterson ( |
| | Lindsay et al. ( |
| | Lindsay et al. ( |
| Syllidae | |
| | Okada ( |
| | Allen ( |
| | Verger-Bocquet ( |
Figure 4Summary of potential mechanisms for NSR in polychaetes. Intracellular regulations involve inhibition of Notch signal, Ca2+ influx through VGCC that phosphorylates cAMP and MAPK signalling. Extracellular regulations involve binding of MAI from oligodendrocyte to RNA binding protein (RBP), growth cone movement by a guidance cue and facilitation by ECM in cell migration, differentiation and proliferation.
Notes: cAMP = cyclic adenosine monophosphate; DLK-1 = dual leucine zipper kinase; MAI = myelin-associate inhibitor; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; VGCC = voltage-gated calcium channel
Comparison of well-studied animal models and polychaete in the study of nervous system
| Aspects | Model organisms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Polychaete | ||||
| Regeneration capability | Severed spinal cord, injured brain, damaged retina, amputated fin etc ( | Axon, neuron of the adult, wing imaginal disk | Axon, neurons | Muscle, organs, appendages, brain, nerve cord. However, no specific studies on neuron, axon or other nerve cells regeneration available. They should be able to regenerate since both anterior and posterior can regenerate |
| Research focus | Alzheimer’s, genetic study, development study, cell biology | Alzheimer’s, genetic study, traumatic brain injury, regeneration study at larval stage | Learning and memory, Alzheimer’s | Taxonomy. Potentially for brain diseases such as dementia, brain injury, spinal cord injury, learning and memory |
| Advantage | Manipulable and transparent embryo ( | Fully sequenced genome ( | Transparent roundworm, short life cycle ( | Progressive action of regeneration after injury, distinct separation between nervous system and other structures makes it easier to study, capable of autotomy (self-amputation), damage can be induced by amputation |
| Disadvantage | Complex behaviour cannot be measured, injury procedure involves dissection | No records on regeneration at adult stage, complex behaviour cannot be measured | Complex behaviour cannot be measured, no myelin, no invading macrophages, regeneration only occurs upon injury, difficult to induce injury | Still lacking of proves |