Literature DB >> 21672762

Distribution of segment regeneration ability in the Annelida.

Alexandra E Bely1.   

Abstract

The annelids are an excellent group in which to investigate the evolution of regeneration abilities. They exhibit qualitative and quantitative variation in regeneration ability, including among closely related species, and their segmental body organization makes comparing results among species relatively straightforward. Here, I compile information on the presence/absence of segment regeneration ability across the annelids. The ability to regenerate posteriorly appears to be nearly universal in the annelids. It is almost certainly ancestral for the phylum and may have been lost only a few times. The ability to regenerate anteriorly is common but less widespread. It is absent in about a dozen groups, almost surely representing multiple independent losses of this ability. Several non-regenerating species are closely related to regenerating species, indicating very recent losses (or gains). Despite the fact that lack of this ability is unusual, there is a publication bias against reporting the lack of regeneration ability, and in many cases the judgment that a particular species is unable to regenerate is based on incomplete or unpublished data. Thus, in order to build rigorous frameworks for future comparative studies of annelid regeneration, there is a need for published studies clearly documenting the lack of regeneration abilities in annelid species. The review of regeneration data presented here is especially useful in highlighting annelid groups that possess both regenerating and non-regenerating representatives. Investigations of these groups may be particularly useful for elucidating the mechanisms leading to the loss (or perhaps gain) of segment regeneration ability.

Year:  2006        PMID: 21672762     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icj051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  35 in total

1.  SAPling: a Scan-Add-Print barcoding database system to label and track asexual organisms.

Authors:  Michael A Thomas; Eva-Maria Schötz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Worms by number.

Authors:  C J Glasby; S P Glasby; F Pleijel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Latent regeneration abilities persist following recent evolutionary loss in asexual annelids.

Authors:  Alexandra E Bely; James M Sikes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Developmental biology of the leech Helobdella.

Authors:  David A Weisblat; Dian-Han Kuo
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.203

5.  Fundamental aspects of arm repair phase in two echinoderm models.

Authors:  Cinzia Ferrario; Yousra Ben Khadra; Anna Czarkwiani; Anne Zakrzewski; Pedro Martinez; Graziano Colombo; Francesco Bonasoro; Maria Daniela Candia Carnevali; Paola Oliveri; Michela Sugni
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Preliminary evaluation of Diopatra neapolitana regenerative capacity as a biomarker for paracetamol exposure.

Authors:  Rosa Freitas; Diogo Coelho; Adília Pires; Amadeu M V M Soares; Etelvina Figueira; Bruno Nunes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The transcriptome of anterior regeneration in earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae.

Authors:  Sayan Paul; Subburathinam Balakrishnan; Arun Arumugaperumal; Saranya Lathakumari; Sandhya Soman Syamala; Vaithilingaraja Arumugaswami; Sudhakar Sivasubramaniam
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hydra Regeneration.

Authors:  Puli Chandramouli Reddy; Akhila Gungi; Manu Unni
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2019

9.  Effects of nerve injury and segmental regeneration on the cellular correlates of neural morphallaxis.

Authors:  Veronica G Martinez; Josiah M B Manson; Mark J Zoran
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 2.656

10.  Activation of Hox genes during caudal regeneration of the polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii.

Authors:  Kathrin Pfeifer; Adriaan W C Dorresteijn; Andreas C Fröbius
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 0.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.