Manabu Amiki1,2, Yosuke Seki3, Kazunori Kasama1, Kenkichi Hashimoto1,4, Michiko Kitagawa1, Akiko Umezawa1, Yoshimochi Kurokawa1. 1. Weight loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, 7-7 Nibancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0084, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, 31-27 Omiyacho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan. 3. Weight loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, 7-7 Nibancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0084, Japan. y-seki@mcube.jp. 4. National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, 1-8-1, Jigyohama, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery is increasing in Japan, revision surgery is uncommon. To clarify indications for the various revision surgeries available, we retrospectively assessed perioperative/postoperative outcomes of revisional weight loss surgeries performed at our medical center between July 2006 and July 2017. METHODS: The study group comprised patients treated for insufficient weight loss (IWL group, n = 15) or intractable postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD group, n = 9). Clinical characteristics and perioperative/postoperative outcomes were assessed for the total patients, per patient group, and per type of revision surgery performed. RESULTS: In the IWL group, BMI decreased from 47.3 ± 9.2 kg/m2 at the time of revision surgery to 36.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2 1 year later, and excess weight loss (%EWL) reached 62.7 ± 14.6%. Among patients whose primary surgery was laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, %EWL and total weight loss (%) were greater after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LBPD/DS) or duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) than after other revision surgeries. Complete or partial remission of the GERD was achieved in all GERD group patients (9/9, 100%), and six (6/9, 66.7%) were able to discontinue proton pump inhibitor therapy. Serious complications occurred in four patients (4/24, 16.7%) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB): stump leakage in one, gastrojejunal leak in one, and gastrojejunal stricture in two. CONCLUSION: LBPD/DS or DJB as revision surgery appears to be effective for further weight loss in the medium term, and LRYGB appears to be effective for GERD remission. Bariatric surgeons should bear in mind, however, that the post-LRYGB complication rate appears to be relatively high.
INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery is increasing in Japan, revision surgery is uncommon. To clarify indications for the various revision surgeries available, we retrospectively assessed perioperative/postoperative outcomes of revisional weight loss surgeries performed at our medical center between July 2006 and July 2017. METHODS: The study group comprised patients treated for insufficient weight loss (IWL group, n = 15) or intractable postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD group, n = 9). Clinical characteristics and perioperative/postoperative outcomes were assessed for the total patients, per patient group, and per type of revision surgery performed. RESULTS: In the IWL group, BMI decreased from 47.3 ± 9.2 kg/m2 at the time of revision surgery to 36.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2 1 year later, and excess weight loss (%EWL) reached 62.7 ± 14.6%. Among patients whose primary surgery was laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, %EWL and total weight loss (%) were greater after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LBPD/DS) or duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) than after other revision surgeries. Complete or partial remission of the GERD was achieved in all GERD group patients (9/9, 100%), and six (6/9, 66.7%) were able to discontinue proton pump inhibitor therapy. Serious complications occurred in four patients (4/24, 16.7%) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB): stump leakage in one, gastrojejunal leak in one, and gastrojejunal stricture in two. CONCLUSION: LBPD/DS or DJB as revision surgery appears to be effective for further weight loss in the medium term, and LRYGB appears to be effective for GERD remission. Bariatric surgeons should bear in mind, however, that the post-LRYGB complication rate appears to be relatively high.
Authors: Leena Khaitan; Kent Van Sickle; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Lin; Bruce Ramshaw; C Daniel Smith Journal: Am Surg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Piotr Major; Piotr Zarzycki; Justyna Rymarowicz; Michał Wysocki; Michał Łabul; Hady Razak Hady; Paulina Głuszyńska; Piotr Myśliwiec; Grzegorz Kowalski; Michał Orłowski; Jacek Szeliga; Wojciech Kupczyk; Wiesław Tarnowski; Paweł Lech; Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz; Monika Proczko-Stepaniak; Maciej Walędziak; Paweł Szymański; Tomasz Stefura; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 1.627
Authors: Pouya Iranmanesh; John Fam; Thomas Nguyen; David Talarico; Kavita D Chandwani; Kulvinder S Bajwa; Melissa M Felinski; Leon V Katz; Sheilendra S Mehta; Stephan R Myers; Brad E Snyder; Peter A Walker; Todd D Wilson; Angielyn R Rivera; Connie L Klein; Shinil K Shah; Erik B Wilson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 4.584