Literature DB >> 15757050

Laparoscopic revision of bariatric procedures: is it feasible?

Leena Khaitan1, Kent Van Sickle, Rodrigo Gonzalez, Edward Lin, Bruce Ramshaw, C Daniel Smith.   

Abstract

Reoperative bariatric surgery is required in 10 per cent to 20 per cent of patients secondary to weight regain or complications of the previous procedure. This study evaluates the feasibility of performing the revision procedure laparoscopically. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing revision of a previous weight loss procedure between October 1998 and November 2003 was conducted. Demographics, indications for surgery, operative findings, and complications were reviewed. Thirty-nine revisions were performed in 37 patients. Indications for revision were failure to lose weight (22), gastric outlet stricture (10), refractory gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) (6), and blind loop syndrome (1). All 39 procedures were revised to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), with 18 open revisions (OR) and 21 laparoscopic revisions (LR). Ten of the 21 LR (48%) were converted to an open procedure due to adhesions or unclear anatomy. Early complications requiring operation were noted in five procedures (two OR, three LR). Nine patients (seven OR, two LR) required surgery at least 3 months following their revision. One patient died (LR). The difference in body mass index (kg/m2) (BMI) pre- and post-op was 43.3+/-9.9 versus 37.4+/-9.2, P = 0.01 (follow-up 5 months), but no significant BMI differences between LR and OR patients were seen. Revisional bariatric surgery is associated with more complications requiring surgery early in the laparoscopic population versus more late complications in those approached open. Revisional bariatric surgery can be approached laparoscopically and with acceptable morbidity comparable to patients whose revision is approached open.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15757050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  31 in total

1.  Conversion from band to bypass in two steps reduces the risk for anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Yves Van Nieuwenhove; Wim Ceelen; Katrien Van Renterghem; Dirk Van de Putte; Tom Henckens; Piet Pattyn
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Alfons Pomp; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications.

Authors:  Hideharu Shimizu; Shohrat Annaberdyev; Isaac Motamarry; Matthew Kroh; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic revisional surgery for an unusual complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Micaela Raices; Ignacio Fuente; Fanny Rodriguez; Fernando Wright
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-20

6.  Reasons and outcomes of reoperative bariatric surgery for failed and complicated procedures (excluding adjustable gastric banding).

Authors:  Sheetal Patel; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Case-matched analysis comparing outcomes of revisional versus primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Alessandro Mor; Elizabeth Keenan; Dana Portenier; Alfonso Torquati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Safety and efficacy of single-stage conversion of failed adjustable gastric band to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kamran Samakar; Travis J McKenzie; James Kaberna; Ali Tavakkoli; Ashley H Vernon; Arin L Madenci; Scott A Shikora; Malcolm K Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB.

Authors:  H Mason Hedberg; Alexander Trenk; Kristine Kuchta; John G Linn; JoAnn Carbray; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction.

Authors:  Lava Y Patel; Brittany Lapin; Craig S Brown; Thomas Stringer; Matthew E Gitelis; John G Linn; Woody E Denham; Elizabeth Farwell; Stephen Haggerty; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.