Literature DB >> 31907716

A multi-scanner study of MRI radiomics in uterine cervical cancer: prediction of in-field tumor control after definitive radiotherapy based on a machine learning method including peritumoral regions.

Akiyo Takada1, Hajime Yokota2, Miho Watanabe Nemoto3, Takuro Horikoshi1, Jun Matsushima4, Takashi Uno3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the most appropriate volume of interest (VOI) setting in prognostic prediction using pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic analysis for cervical cancer (CC) treated with definitive radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study participants were 87 patients who had undergone pretreatment MRI and definitive radiotherapy for CC. VOItumor was created with tumor alone and VOI+4 mm-VOI+20 mm mechanically expanded by 4-20 mm around each VOItumor in axial T2-weighted images (T2WI) and an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. A model was constructed to predict recurrence within the irradiation field within 2 years after treatment using imaging features from the VOI of each sequence. Sorting ability was evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: VOI expansion improved AUC-ROCs compared with the predictive models of VOItumor (0.59 and 0.67 in T2WI and ADC, respectively). The AUC-ROCs of the models with imaging features from expanded VOI+4 mm in T2WI and VOI+4 mm and VOI+8 mm in ADC were 0.82, 0.82, and 0.86, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Recurrence could be predicted with high accuracy using expanded VOI for CC treated with definitive radiotherapy, suggesting that including the pathological characteristics of invasive margins in radiomics may improve predictive ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-field recurrence; Machine learning; Prognosis; Radiomics; Uterine cervical cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31907716     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-019-00917-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  22 in total

1.  Prognostic model in patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a combination of invasive margin pathological characteristics and lymphovascular space invasion.

Authors:  Surapan Khunamornpong; Suree Lekawanvijit; Jongkolnee Settakorn; Kornkanok Sukpan; Prapaporn Suprasert; Sumalee Siriaunkgul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

2.  LIFEx: A Freeware for Radiomic Feature Calculation in Multimodality Imaging to Accelerate Advances in the Characterization of Tumor Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Christophe Nioche; Fanny Orlhac; Sarah Boughdad; Sylvain Reuzé; Jessica Goya-Outi; Charlotte Robert; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Michael Soussan; Frédérique Frouin; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Daily low-dose Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer in patients 70 years or older.

Authors:  Shinsuke Hanawa; Akira Mitsuhashi; Hirokazu Usui; Noriko Yamamoto; Miho Watanabe-Nemoto; Kyoko Nishikimi; Takashi Uehara; Shinichi Tate; Takashi Uno; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  François Lucia; Dimitris Visvikis; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Omar Miranda; Jean-Pierre Malhaire; Philippe Robin; Olivier Pradier; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  The prognostic factors for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chen; Lily Wang; Jin-Ching Lin; Jian-Sheng Jan
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten G Thomeer; Cees Gerestein; Sandra Spronk; Helena C van Doorn; Els van der Ham; Myriam G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Relationship between high density of peritumoral lymphatic vessels and biological behavior of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Song En-Lin; Yu Wei-Wei; Xiong Xiao-Liang; Xu Juan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Investigating multi-radiomic models for enhancing prediction power of cervical cancer treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Baderaldeen A Altazi; Daniel C Fernandez; Geoffrey G Zhang; Samuel Hawkins; Syeda M Naqvi; Youngchul Kim; Dylan Hunt; Kujtim Latifi; Matthew Biagioli; Puja Venkat; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Braman; Maryam Etesami; Prateek Prasanna; Christina Dubchuk; Hannah Gilmore; Pallavi Tiwari; Donna Plecha; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative PET Imaging and Clinical Parameters as Predictive Factors for Patients With Cervical Carcinoma: Implications of a Prediction Model Generated Using Multi-Objective Support Vector Machine Learning.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhou; Genevieve M Maquilan; Kimberly Thomas; Jason Wachsmann; Jing Wang; Michael R Folkert; Kevin Albuquerque
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

2.  Can peritumoral regions increase the efficiency of machine-learning prediction of pathological invasiveness in lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules?

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Kaili Chen; Wei Wang; Qingchu Li; Kai Liu; Qianyun Li; Xing Cui; Wenting Tu; Hongbiao Sun; Shaochun Xu; Rongguo Zhang; Yi Xiao; Li Fan; Shiyuan Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Prediction of out-of-field recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer using a combination model of clinical parameters and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics: a multi-institutional study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ikushima; Akihiro Haga; Ken Ando; Shingo Kato; Yuko Kaneyasu; Takashi Uno; Noriyuki Okonogi; Kenji Yoshida; Takuro Ariga; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yoko Harima; Ayae Kanemoto; Noriko Ii; Masaru Wakatsuki; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Radiomics in Oncology, Part 2: Thoracic, Genito-Urinary, Breast, Neurological, Hematologic and Musculoskeletal Applications.

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Michela Polici; Marta Zerunian; Francesco Pucciarelli; Gisella Guido; Tiziano Polidori; Federica Landolfi; Matteo Nicolai; Elena Lucertini; Mariarita Tarallo; Benedetta Bracci; Ilaria Nacci; Carlotta Rucci; Marwen Eid; Elsa Iannicelli; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Radiogenomics of gastroenterological cancer: The dawn of personalized medicine with artificial intelligence-based image analysis.

Authors:  Isamu Hoshino; Hajime Yokota
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 6.  Radiomics in cervical and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Gabriele Maria Nicolino; Miriam Dolciami; Federica Martorana; Anastasios Stathis; Ilaria Colombo; Stefania Rizzo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.