Literature DB >> 29475772

Investigating multi-radiomic models for enhancing prediction power of cervical cancer treatment outcomes.

Baderaldeen A Altazi1, Daniel C Fernandez2, Geoffrey G Zhang3, Samuel Hawkins4, Syeda M Naqvi5, Youngchul Kim6, Dylan Hunt7, Kujtim Latifi8, Matthew Biagioli9, Puja Venkat10, Eduardo G Moros11.   

Abstract

Quantitative image features, also known as radiomic features, have shown potential for predicting treatment outcomes in several body sites. We quantitatively analyzed 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) uptake heterogeneity in the Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) of eighty cervical cancer patients to investigate the predictive performance of radiomic features for two treatment outcomes: the development of distant metastases (DM) and loco-regional recurrent disease (LRR). We aimed to fit the highest predictive features in multiple logistic regression models (MLRs). To generate such models, we applied backward feature selection method as part of Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV) within a training set consisting of 70% of the original patient cohort. The trained MLRs were tested on an independent set consisted of 30% of the original cohort. We evaluated the performance of the final models using the Area under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC). Accordingly, six models demonstrated superior predictive performance for both outcomes (four for DM and two for LRR) when compared to both univariate-radiomic feature models and Standard Uptake Value (SUV) measurements. This demonstrated approach suggests that the ability of the pre-radiochemotherapy PET radiomics to stratify patient risk for DM and LRR could potentially guide management decisions such as adjuvant systemic therapy or radiation dose escalation.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Positron emission tomography; Radiomics; Tumor uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29475772      PMCID: PMC7771366          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  28 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT can predict nodal metastases but not recurrence in early stage uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cinzia Crivellaro; Mauro Signorelli; Luca Guerra; Elena De Ponti; Alessandro Buda; Carlotta Dolci; Cecilia Pirovano; Sergio Todde; Robert Fruscio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  PET/CT imaging artifacts.

Authors:  Waheeda Sureshbabu; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2005-09

4.  SUV: from silly useless value to smart uptake value.

Authors:  Eric P Visser; Otto C Boerman; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Incorporation of tumor shape into an assessment of spatial heterogeneity for human sarcomas imaged with FDG-PET.

Authors:  F O'Sullivan; S Roy; J O'Sullivan; C Vernon; J Eary
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Mathieu Hatt; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Adrien Le Pogam; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Mathieu Hatt; Nidal Albarghach; Olivier Pradier; Jean-Philippe Metges; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kidd; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 2, Infradiaphragmatic Cancers, Blood Malignancies, Melanoma and Musculoskeletal Cancers.

Authors:  David Morland; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Luca Boldrini; Roberto Gatta; Daniele Pizzuto; Salvatore Annunziata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Combination of Radiomics and Machine Learning with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Clinical Outcome Prognostication in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ankush Jajodia; Ayushi Gupta; Helmut Prosch; Marius Mayerhoefer; Swarupa Mitra; Sunil Pasricha; Anurag Mehta; Sunil Puri; Arvind Chaturvedi
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-08-05

3.  A multi-scanner study of MRI radiomics in uterine cervical cancer: prediction of in-field tumor control after definitive radiotherapy based on a machine learning method including peritumoral regions.

Authors:  Akiyo Takada; Hajime Yokota; Miho Watanabe Nemoto; Takuro Horikoshi; Jun Matsushima; Takashi Uno
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Imaging-Based Individualized Response Prediction Of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy For Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shuang Wu; Yining Jiao; Yafang Zhang; Xuhua Ren; Ping Li; Qi Yu; Qing Zhang; Qian Wang; Shen Fu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  A deep survival interpretable radiomics model of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Lise Wei; Dawn Owen; Benjamin Rosen; Xinzhou Guo; Kyle Cuneo; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Lidija Antunovic; Arturo Chiti; Margarita Kirienko
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Quantitative PET Imaging and Clinical Parameters as Predictive Factors for Patients With Cervical Carcinoma: Implications of a Prediction Model Generated Using Multi-Objective Support Vector Machine Learning.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhou; Genevieve M Maquilan; Kimberly Thomas; Jason Wachsmann; Jing Wang; Michael R Folkert; Kevin Albuquerque
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

8.  Prediction of out-of-field recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer using a combination model of clinical parameters and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics: a multi-institutional study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ikushima; Akihiro Haga; Ken Ando; Shingo Kato; Yuko Kaneyasu; Takashi Uno; Noriyuki Okonogi; Kenji Yoshida; Takuro Ariga; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yoko Harima; Ayae Kanemoto; Noriko Ii; Masaru Wakatsuki; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  [18F]FDG PET radiomics to predict disease-free survival in cervical cancer: a multi-scanner/center study with external validation.

Authors:  Marta Ferreira; Pierre Lovinfosse; Johanne Hermesse; Marjolein Decuypere; Caroline Rousseau; François Lucia; Ulrike Schick; Caroline Reinhold; Philippe Robin; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Claire Bernard; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Frédéric Kridelka; Philippe Lambin; Patrick E Meyer; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2 weighted imaging-based radiomic signatures for the preoperative discrimination of ovarian borderline tumors and malignant tumors.

Authors:  Xuefen Liu; Tianping Wang; Guofu Zhang; Keqin Hua; Hua Jiang; Shaofeng Duan; Jun Jin; He Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.234

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.