Caroline Sönnerqvist1, Ole Brus2, Magnus Olivecrona3,4. 1. School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 2. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 3. Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. magnus.olivecrona@oru.se. 4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Section for Neurosurgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden. magnus.olivecrona@oru.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Head trauma in children is common, with a low rate of clinically important traumatic brain injury. CT scan is the reference standard for diagnosis of traumatic brain injury, of which the increasing use is alarming because of the risk of induction of lethal malignancies. Recently, the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee derived new guidelines for the initial management of minor and moderate head trauma. Our aim was to validate these guidelines. METHODS: We applied the guidelines to a population consisting of children with mild and moderate head trauma, enrolled in the study: "Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study" by Kuppermann et al. (Lancet 374(9696):1160-1170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0 , 2009). We calculated the negative predictive values of the guidelines to assess their ability to distinguish children without clinically-important traumatic brain injuries and traumatic brain injuries on CT scans, for whom CT could be omitted. RESULTS: We analysed a population of 43,025 children. For clinically-important brain injuries among children with minimal head injuries, the negative predictive value was 99.8% and the rate was 0.15%. For traumatic findings on CT, the negative predictive value was 96.9%. Traumatic finding on CT was detected in 3.1% of children with minimal head injuries who underwent a CT examination, which accounts for 0.45% of all children in this group. CONCLUSION: Children with minimal head injuries can be safely discharged with oral and written instructions. Use of the SNC-G will potentially reduce the use of CT.
BACKGROUND:Head trauma in children is common, with a low rate of clinically important traumatic brain injury. CT scan is the reference standard for diagnosis of traumatic brain injury, of which the increasing use is alarming because of the risk of induction of lethal malignancies. Recently, the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee derived new guidelines for the initial management of minor and moderate head trauma. Our aim was to validate these guidelines. METHODS: We applied the guidelines to a population consisting of children with mild and moderate head trauma, enrolled in the study: "Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study" by Kuppermann et al. (Lancet 374(9696):1160-1170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0 , 2009). We calculated the negative predictive values of the guidelines to assess their ability to distinguish children without clinically-important traumatic brain injuries and traumatic brain injuries on CT scans, for whom CT could be omitted. RESULTS: We analysed a population of 43,025 children. For clinically-important brain injuries among children with minimal head injuries, the negative predictive value was 99.8% and the rate was 0.15%. For traumatic findings on CT, the negative predictive value was 96.9%. Traumatic finding on CT was detected in 3.1% of children with minimal head injuries who underwent a CT examination, which accounts for 0.45% of all children in this group. CONCLUSION:Children with minimal head injuries can be safely discharged with oral and written instructions. Use of the SNC-G will potentially reduce the use of CT.
Authors: Lise E Nigrovic; Anne M Stack; Rebekah C Mannix; Todd W Lyons; Mihail Samnaliev; Richard G Bachur; Mark R Proctor Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Martin H Osmond; Terry P Klassen; George A Wells; Rhonda Correll; Anna Jarvis; Gary Joubert; Benoit Bailey; Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff; Martin Pusic; Don McConnell; Cheri Nijssen-Jordan; Norm Silver; Brett Taylor; Ian G Stiell Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Martin H Osmond; Terry P Klassen; George A Wells; Jennifer Davidson; Rhonda Correll; Kathy Boutis; Gary Joubert; Serge Gouin; Simi Khangura; Troy Turner; Francois Belanger; Norm Silver; Brett Taylor; Janet Curran; Ian G Stiell Journal: CMAJ Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Franz E Babl; Meredith L Borland; Natalie Phillips; Amit Kochar; Sarah Dalton; Mary McCaskill; John A Cheek; Yuri Gilhotra; Jeremy Furyk; Jocelyn Neutze; Mark D Lyttle; Silvia Bressan; Susan Donath; Charlotte Molesworth; Kim Jachno; Brenton Ward; Amanda Williams; Amy Baylis; Louise Crowe; Ed Oakley; Stuart R Dalziel Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nathan Kuppermann; James F Holmes; Peter S Dayan; John D Hoyle; Shireen M Atabaki; Richard Holubkov; Frances M Nadel; David Monroe; Rachel M Stanley; Dominic A Borgialli; Mohamed K Badawy; Jeff E Schunk; Kimberly S Quayle; Prashant Mahajan; Richard Lichenstein; Kathleen A Lillis; Michael G Tunik; Elizabeth S Jacobs; James M Callahan; Marc H Gorelick; Todd F Glass; Lois K Lee; Michael C Bachman; Arthur Cooper; Elizabeth C Powell; Michael J Gerardi; Kraig A Melville; J Paul Muizelaar; David H Wisner; Sally Jo Zuspan; J Michael Dean; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321