| Literature DB >> 31906502 |
Karen Clément-Colmou1,2,3, Vincent Potiron1,2, Manon Pietri1,2, Maëva Guillonneau1,2, Emmanuel Jouglar1,2, Sophie Chiavassa1,2,4, Grégory Delpon1,2,4, François Paris1,2, Stéphane Supiot1,2,3.
Abstract
Background. The tumor vasculature acts as an interface for the primary tumor. It regulates oxygenation, nutrient delivery, and treatment efficacy including radiotherapy. The response of the tumor vasculature to different radiation doses has been disparately reported. Whereas high single doses can induce endothelial cell death, improved vascular functionality has also been described in a various dose range, and few attempts have been made to reconcile these findings. Therefore, we aimed at comparing the effects of different radiation fractionation regimens on the tumor vascular microenvironment.Entities:
Keywords: fractionation; hypoxia; microenvironment; radiotherapy; stereotactic radiotherapy; vasculature
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906502 PMCID: PMC7017121 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Tumor control in response to radiotherapy (RT) fractionation schedule. (A) Experimental calendar of fractionation. (B,C) Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of PC3 (B) and LLC (C) tumor-bearing animals. Established tumors were irradiated as indicated and animals were counted dead when the tumor volume reached 2000 mm3. Experiments were done twice with a total of n ≥ 15 per group. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 2Tumor vascular phenotype in response to RT fractionation schedule. (A) Immunohistological staining for pericyte coverage (αSMA, desmin) around tumor vessels (CD31) two weeks after RT initiation in PC3 and LLC tumors. (B,C) Quantification of vessel density in PC3 (B) and LLC (C) tumors at day 15. (D,E) Quantification of vascular mural coverage (αSMA: plain, desmin: squared) in PC3 (D) and LLC (E) tumors at day 15. Images and analysis represent two independent experiments with a total ≥18 tumors per point. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 3Tumor hypoxia and perfusion in response to RT fractionation schedule. (A) Immunohistological staining for hypoxia (pimonidazole) and perfusion (Hoechst 33342) two weeks after RT initiation in PC3 and LLC tumors. (B,C) Quantification of hypoxia in PC3 (B) and LLC (C) tumors at day 15. (D,E) Quantification of Hoechst perfusion in PC3 (D) and LLC (E) tumors at day 15. Images and analysis represent two independent experiments with a total ≥18 PC3 and ≥15 LLC tumors per point. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 4Time window of vascular changes after 2 × 12 Gy in LLC tumors. (A) Fractionation and collection schedule. (B) Immunohistological staining for hypoxia (pimonidazole, B), vessels and perfusion (CD31 and Hoechst 33342, C) in function of time after RT initiation in LLC tumors. (D–F) Quantification of hypoxia (pimonidazole, D), perfusion (Hoechst 33342, E) and vessel density (F) after RT initiation in LLC tumors. Controls were collected at d9. Images and analysis represent ≥7 tumors per point. * indicates p < 0.05.