| Literature DB >> 31906148 |
Dorota Weigt1, Angelika Kiel1, Idzi Siatkowski2, Joanna Zyprych-Walczak2, Agnieszka Tomkowiak1, Michał Kwiatek1.
Abstract
Androgenesis is potentially the most effective technique for doubled haploid production of wheat. It is not however widely used in breeding programmes due to its main limitation: the genotype dependence. Due to genetic differences between spring and winter wheat, it was assumed that both phenotypes are different in their capacity to conduct androgenesis. And so, the aim of this investigation was to verify the effectiveness of androgenesis induction and plant regeneration of spring and winter wheat genotypes while considering varying amounts of growth hormones in the induction medium. Fifteen genotypes of spring wheat and fifteen of winter wheat were used in the experiment. Six hundred anthers of each of the 30 genotypes were plated and analysed. Previous studies have allowed selection of the best medium for wheat androgenesis and a combination of growth hormones that are the most effective in stimulating microspore proliferation. Therefore, C17 induction media with two combinations of growth hormones were used: I-supplemented only by auxins (2,4-D and dicamba), and II-supplemented by auxin and cytokinin (2,4-D and kinetin). Data was recorded according to the efficiency of androgenic structure formation (ASF), green plant regeneration (GPR), and albino plant regeneration (APR). The results showed that the induction and regeneration of androgenesis in the spring wheat were more efficient than in the winter ones. The spring genotypes formed more androgenic structures and green plants on anthers plated on the medium supplemented only by auxins, in contrast to the winter genotypes which were better induced and regenerated on the medium supplemented by auxin and cytokinin. The study showed that to increase the efficiency of androgenesis, it is necessary to select appropriate factors such as concentration and type of hormones in medium composition, affecting the course of the culturing procedure according to the winter or spring phenotype of donor plants.Entities:
Keywords: androgenesis; anther culture; doubled haploid; induction medium; spring wheat; winter wheat
Year: 2019 PMID: 31906148 PMCID: PMC7020181 DOI: 10.3390/plants9010049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The average efficiency calculated for both tested media combinations of androgenic structures formation (ASF), green plants regeneration (GPR) and albino plants regeneration (APR) from the spring and winter wheat genotypes.
| Phenotype | Genotype | ASF | GPR | APR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | Avg. | I | II | Avg. | I | II | Avg. | ||
| Spring | Tybalt | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Rescue | 0.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | |
| Fortuna | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | |
| Leda Collection A47 | 5.3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | |
| Ostka Smolicka | 8.0 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Ruzynska II | 4.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Carola | 4.7 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | |
| AC Abbey | 24.7 | 6.0 | 15.3 | 36.7 | 3.3 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | |
| Tioga | 23.3 | 13.3 | 18.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | |
| Parabola | 3.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | |
| Chinook | 5.3 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | |
| Glenman | 10.7 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Arabella | 5.0 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | |
| Sawtana | 10.0 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Sumai 3 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |
|
| 7.7 | 4.9 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| Winter | Greer | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| KS96WGRC36 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Wichita | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Geneva | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| Freedom | 1.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Lr19 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Augusta | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Century | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Antelope | 6.7 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| Agrus | 3.7 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |
| Clark | 1.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | |
| Ozon | 6.0 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |
| Hondia | 12.3 | 10.0 | 11.2 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | |
| Karl 92 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |
| Tam 107 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
|
| 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
I—induction medium containing 2,4-D + dicamba; II—induction medium containing 2,4-D + kinetin.
Figure 1A PCA biplot showing the influence of the media on regeneration. C1, C2, C3—the androgenic structures, green plants and albino plants from the spring genotypes, respectively. C4, C5, C6—the androgenic structures, green plants and albino plants from the winter genotypes, respectively.
Figure 2The efficiency of androgenic structures formation (ASF), green plants regeneration (GPR) and albino plants regeneration (APR) of the spring and winter genotypes according to the type of growth hormones in the induction media (I—containing auxins only and II—containing auxin and cytokinin); mean value ± standard error of mean (SEM).
A comparison of the efficiency of androgenic structures formation (ASF), green plants regeneration (GPR) and albino plants regeneration (APR) of the spring and winter varieties according to the type of growth hormones in the induction media based on right-sided Wilcoxon test.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ASF (no of androgenic structures/100 plated anthers) | 177.0 | 0.004 ** |
| GPR (no of green plants regeneration/100 plated anthers) | 160.0 | 0.020 * |
| APR (no of albino plants regeneration/100 plated anthers) | 140.5 | 0.109 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ASF (no of androgenic structures/100 plated anthers) | 128.5 | 0.260 |
| GPR (no of green plants regeneration/100 plated anthers) | 154.5 | 0.040 * |
| APR (no of albino plants regeneration/100 plated anthers) | 126.0 | 0.265 |
Signif. codes: 0 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05.
The origin and pedigree of the spring and winter wheat genotypes.
| Phenotype | Genotype | Source | Pedigree |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tybalt | NSGC | ZE 95-2355/Chablis |
| Rescue | NSGC | Apex/S-615 | |
| Fortuna | NSGC | Kenya 58/Newthatch//Frontana/3/Rescue/Chinook | |
| Leda Collection A47 | NSGC | Leda/Hybrid 46 | |
| Ostka Smolicka | PBS | Palermo/KOC 2926/92 | |
| Ruzynska II | NSGC | Unknown-Solid-stemmed-Variety | |
| Carola | LIPK | Capega/Garant | |
| AC Abbey | AAFC | BW608/93464//BW591 | |
| Tioga | NSGC | Fortuna/3/ND 4/Rescue//II-50-17/51-3349 | |
| Parabola | MPB | Torka /Henika//Candeza. | |
| Chinook | NSGC | Thatcher/S615-11 | |
| Glenman | NSGC | Tezanos Pintos Precoz/Sonora 64 (208774C-1R8M)//Fortuna | |
| Arabella | DPB | Leiffer/Batuta | |
| Sawtana | NSGC | Rescue//Mida/Cadet | |
| Sumai 3 | NSGC | Funo/Taiwan Xiaomai | |
|
| Greer | NSGC | WA 4765//Burt/PI 178383 |
| KS96WGRC36 | NSGC | TAM 107/4/TA 870 | |
| Wichita | NSGC | Early Blackhull/Tenmarq | |
| Geneva | NSGC | Ross wheat (Heine’s VII)/3/(NY5207aB-2B-34) Burt//Genesee/CI 12658/4/Genesee | |
| Freedom | NSGC | GR-876/OH-217 | |
| Lr19 | NSGC | Thatcher*6/Agropyron elongatum | |
| Augusta | NSGC | B2747 (Genessee/Redcoat) //Yorkstar | |
| Century | NSGC | Payne//TAM W-101/Amigo | |
| Antelope | NSGC | Pronghorn/Arlin | |
| Agrus | NSGC | Trumbull/Agropyron elongatum/4/Fultz sel./3/Trumbull//Hope/Hussar | |
| Clark | NSGC | Beau//65256A1-8-1/67137B5-16/4/Sullivan/3/Beau//5517B8-5-3-3 /Logan; 65256A1-8-1 = Caldwell sib | |
| Ozon | DPB | LP-296-4-96/Tambor//Denver | |
| Hondia | DPB | CHS38337/KOC1284/97 | |
| Karl | NSGC | Plainsman V/3/Kaw/Atlas 50//Parker*5/Agent | |
| Tam 107 | NSGC | TAM 105*4/Amigo |
NSGC—National Small Grain Collection, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Aberdeen-Idaho, USA. LIPK—Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung—Gatersleben, Germany. DPB—Danko Plant Breeding Ltd., Poland. MPB—Malopolska Plant Breeding Ltd., Poland. PBS—Plant Breeding Smolice Ltd. IHAR Group, Poland.
Figure 3Microspores at the mononuclear stage suitable for anther culture. Bar represents 50 μm.