| Literature DB >> 28042231 |
Dorota Weigt1, Angelika Kiel1, Jerzy Nawracała1, Mateusz Pluta1, Agnieszka Łacka2.
Abstract
Solid-stemmed spring wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) are resistant to the stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Nort.) and lodging. Anthers of 24 spring wheat cultivars with varying content of pith in the stem were used in the experiment. All were classified into three groups: solid, medium-solid and hollow stems. There was considerable influence of the cultivar on callus formation and green plant regeneration. The highest efficiency of green plant regeneration (24%) was observed for the solid-stemmed AC Abbey cultivar. There was no regeneration from the explants of four cultivars: CLTR 7027, Alentejano, Marquis and Bombona. Principal component analysis showed no differences between the cases under observation (callus induction and green plant regeneration) in their response to pre-treatment temperatures (4 and 8°C). The examination of the effects of various auxin types in the induction medium on callus formation and green plant regeneration revealed that the strongest stimulation of these processes was observed in the C17 medium with 2,4-D and dicamba. The efficiency of callus formation and green plant regeneration was greater in solid-stemmed cultivars than in hollow-stemmed cultivars.Entities:
Keywords: Androgenesis; Haploid; Solid stem; Spring wheat
Year: 2016 PMID: 28042231 PMCID: PMC5159440 DOI: 10.1007/s11627-016-9793-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant ISSN: 1054-5476 Impact factor: 2.252
Evaluation of filling stem by pith of 24 spring wheat cultivars
| Group | Genotype | Stem solidness evaluation (points) |
|---|---|---|
| Solid | CLTR 7027 | 23.8 |
| Carola | 23.6 | |
| Tybalt | 23.3 | |
| Fortuna | 21.5 | |
| Sawtana | 21.34 | |
| AC Abbey | 21.27 | |
| Tioga | 20.7 | |
| Leda Collection A47 | 20.1 | |
| Medium | Glenman | 19.6 |
| Rescue | 19.2 | |
| Chinook | 18.8 | |
| Alentejano | 18.2 | |
| 431 | 17.7 | |
| 401 | 17.5 | |
| Marquis | 16.4 | |
| H N ROD 5 13 750 | 15.3 | |
| Hollow | Arabella | 13.8 |
| 404 | 13.6 | |
| Solid Straw Tuscan Varia | 11.6 | |
| Americano 44D | 11.5 | |
| Ruzynska II | 11.3 | |
| Ostka Smolicka | 11.1 | |
| Parabola | 11.0 | |
| Bombona | 5.8 |
Figure 1.Callus formation from anthers of cv. Sawtana on the induction medium containing 2,4-D and dicamba.
The influence of genotype, temperature pre-treatment and hormones (in the induction medium) on androgenic response of spring wheat
| Group | Genotype | 2,4-D + dicamba | 2,4-D + kinetin | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF (no. of calluses/100 anthers) | GPR (no. of green plants/100 anthers) | APR (no. of albino plants/100 anthers) | CF (no. of calluses/100 anthers) | GPR (no. of green plants/100 anthers) | APR (no. of albino plants/100 anthers) | ||||||||
| 4°C | 8°C | 4°C | 8°C | 4°C | 8°C | 4°C | 8°C | 4°C | 8°C | 4°C | 8°C | ||
| Solid | CLTR 7027 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Carola | 3.78 | 1.78 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.22 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| Tybalt | 2.89 | 5.11 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 1.78 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | |
| Fortuna | 4.67 | 9.56 | 1.33 | 7.33 | 0.22 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| Sawtana | 4.89 | 5.56 | 0.67 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.78 | 3.11 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.44 | |
| Ac Abbey | 1.78 | 4.22 | 24.00 | 3.78 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 2.89 | 5.78 | 1.33 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Tioga | 10.89 | 14.67 | 0.67 | 2.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 5.33 | 8.89 | 1.11 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Leda Collection A47 | 2.00 | 4.44 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 1.11 | 1.33 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | |
| Medium | Glenman | 3.33 | 6.67 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 3.78 | 3.78 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Rescue | 0.22 | 27.78 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 4.44 | 0.89 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Chinook | 4.44 | 11.56 | 1.56 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 8.22 | 1.11 | 1.33 | 0.22 | 0.44 | |
| Alentejano | 1.56 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 431 | 1.11 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 1.11 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.44 | |
| 401 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | |
| Marquis | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| HN ROD 5 13750 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Hollow | Arabella | 6.67 | 5.33 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 1.11 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 1.56 | 0.22 | 0.44 |
| 404 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 2.89 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Solid Straw Tuscan Varia | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 1.11 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Americano 44 | 0.44 | 7.33 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Ruzynska II | 2.00 | 2.89 | 0.89 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 1.56 | 3.78 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Ostka Smolicka | 2.00 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 2.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | |
| Parabola | 2.00 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | |
| Bombona | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Figure 2.Green plant of cv. Carola regeneration on MS medium.
Figure 3.Principal component analysis of the cultivars. Cases are grouped by the applied temperature. Ellipsoids indicate 67% confidence.
Figure 4.Principal component analysis of the cultivars. Points are grouped by the degree of stem solidness and the medium applied. Ellipsoids indicate 67% confidence.