| Literature DB >> 31905948 |
Doyeon Won1, Jung-Sup Bae2, Hyun Byun3, Kwang-Bong Seo4.
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to meta-analytically investigate the psychological impacts of physical activity for the elderly population in Korea. The findings from 21 studies, using the comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) program, indicated that participation in physical activity had a low, but meaningful, impact on the subjective well-being of elderly individuals. Of three exercise dose components, the duration of physical activity was the most influential, followed by the frequency and intensity of the physical activity. Of six subjective well-being measures, self-efficacy was most strongly associated with physical activity, followed by life satisfaction, leisure satisfaction, exercise satisfaction, successful aging, and happiness. Results of moderator analyses indicated that the influence of physical activity became more pronounced as the proportion of males increased. Meanwhile, of the three exercise dose components, only the relationship between the duration and subjective well-being was influenced as the percentage of participants without a spouse or partner increased. Overall, regular participation in physical activity is an effective way of promoting subjective well-being among older adults in Korea. Relevant guidelines regarding physical activity prescription and behavioral management strategies are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: dose-response; elderly; meta-analysis; physical activity; subjective well-being
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31905948 PMCID: PMC6982302 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research model.
Figure 2Flowchart outlining the study selection process.
Studies included in the meta-analysis.
| ID | Author | Year | Type | Sample Size | Dependent Variable(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | An [ | 2002 | Dissertation | 200 | Leisure satisfaction |
| 2 | Choi [ | 2016 | Dissertation | 310 | Happiness, self-efficacy, quality of life |
| 3 | Hong [ | 1996 | Dissertation | 100 | Life satisfaction |
| 4 | Huh, Jung, and Ha [ | 2007 | Journal | 244 | Life satisfaction |
| 5 | Hwang [ | 2004 | Dissertation | 223 | Life satisfaction |
| 6 | Hwang [ | 2015 | Dissertation | 197 | Successful aging |
| 7 | Jeon [ | 2010 | Journal | 276 | Self-efficacy, happiness |
| 8 | Kang and Cha [ | 2010 | Journal | 612 | Leisure satisfaction, life satisfaction, happiness |
| 9 | Kim [ | 1995 | Journal | 400 | Leisure satisfaction, life satisfaction |
| 10 | Kim [ | 2010 | Dissertation | 475 | Happiness |
| 11 | Kim [ | 2016 | Dissertation | 385 | Successful aging |
| 12 | Kim and Yoon [ | 2007 | Journal | 490 | Exercise satisfaction |
| 13 | Lee [ | 2004 | Journal | 683 | Leisure satisfaction, life satisfaction |
| 14 | Lee [ | 2015 | Dissertation | 566 | Successful aging |
| 15 | Lee and Kim [ | 2009 | Journal | 132 | Life satisfaction |
| 16 | Lee, Kim, and Kang [ | 2012 | Journal | 294 | Leisure satisfaction, self-efficacy |
| 17 | Min [ | 2011 | Journal | 664 | Self-efficacy |
| 18 | Park and Ihm [ | 2008 | Journal | 670 | Self-esteem, life satisfaction |
| 19 | Park and Ku [ | 2005 | Journal | 200 | Leisure satisfaction, life satisfaction |
| 20 | Shin [ | 2013 | Dissertation | 439 | Happiness |
| 21 | Yi, Ahn, and Sim [ | 2011 | Journal | 364 | Self-efficacy |
Effect sizes of physical activity on all subjective well-being outcomes.
| Dependent Variables | Model | ESr (r) | −95% CI | +95% CI | Q | I2 | SE | Fail-Safe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggregated | Fixed | 0.200 | 0.188 | 0.213 | 704.399 | 91.766 | 0.006 | 4070 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.338 | 0.310 | 0.365 | 30.962 | 74.162 | 0.005 | ||
| Life satisfaction | 0.210 | 0.191 | 0.229 | 329.133 | 92.100 | 0.011 | ||
| Leisure satisfaction | 0.184 | 0.134 | 0.233 | 50.917 | 90.180 | 0.027 | ||
| Exercise satisfaction | 0.129 | 0.079 | 0.179 | 10.378 | 80.729 | 0.011 | ||
| Successful aging | 0.125 | 0.091 | 0.159 | 129.250 | 94.584 | 0.026 | ||
| Happiness | 0.096 | 0.059 | 0.133 | 8.986 | 44.357 | 0.003 |
Note: ESr (r) = Effect size correlation coefficient; CI = Confidence interval; Q = Cochran’s Q; I2 = inconsistency index (% of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance).
Figure 3Funnel plot.
Effect sizes of three sub-components (exercise doses).
| Physical Activity Participation | Dependent Variables | ESr | −95% CI | +95% CI | Q | I2 | SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration | Psychological outcomes (aggregated) | 0.265 | 0.141 | 0.286 | 254.227 | 92.526 | 0.013 |
| Frequency | 0.171 | 0.244 | 0.192 | 245.859 | 92.272 | 0.012 | |
| Intensity | 0.163 | 0.149 | 0.186 | 151.415 | 88.112 | 0.008 | |
| Duration | Life satisfaction | 0.285 | 0.253 | 0.317 | 150.335 | 94.679 | 0.032 |
| Successful aging | 0.200 | 0.143 | 0.255 | 4.746 | 57.859 | 0.007 | |
| Leisure satisfaction | 0.277 | 0.193 | 0.357 | 37.526 | 97.335 | 0.226 | |
| Self-efficacy | 0.371 | 0.323 | 0.417 | 17.557 | 88.609 | 0.022 | |
| Happiness | 0.153 | 0.089 | 0.215 | 2.055 | 51.349 | 0.006 | |
| Frequency | Life satisfaction | 0.185 | 0.151 | 0.218 | 91.001 | 91.209 | 0.019 |
| Successful aging | 0.100 | 0.042 | 0.157 | 96.152 | 97.920 | 0.144 | |
| Leisure satisfaction | 0.195 | 0.109 | 0.279 | 0.319 | 0.000 | 0.006 | |
| Self-efficacy | 0.310 | 0.260 | 0.359 | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
| Happiness | 0.072 | 0.007 | 0.136 | 0.693 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
| Intensity | Life satisfaction | 0.157 | 0.123 | 0.190 | 54.968 | 85.446 | 0.011 |
| Successful aging | 0.064 | 0.001 | 0.128 | 17.330 | 94.230 | 0.054 | |
| Leisure satisfaction | 0.077 | −0.011 | 0.165 | 2.556 | 60.869 | 0.015 | |
| Self-efficacy | 0.331 | 0.282 | 0.379 | 9.920 | 79.839 | 0.013 | |
| Happiness | 0.064 | −0.001 | 0.128 | 1.733 | 42.280 | 0.005 |
Results of meta regression analysis with the ratio of male subjects.
| Classification | Estimate | SE | −95% CI | +95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration | slope | 0.00986 | 0.00084 | 0.00821 | 0.01152 | 11.69237 | 0.00000 |
| intercept | −0.11136 | 0.03517 | −0.18030 | −0.04242 | −3.16599 | 0.00155 | |
| Frequency | slope | −0.00103 | 0.00084 | −0.00268 | 0.00062 | −1.22034 | 0.22233 |
| intercept | 0.21568 | 0.03517 | 0.14674 | 0.28462 | 6.13184 | 0.00000 | |
| Intensity | slope | 0.00620 | 0.00087 | 0.00449 | 0.00790 | 7.13147 | 0.00000 |
| intercept | −0.06350 | 0.03665 | −0.13534 | 0.00833 | −1.73259 | 0.08317 | |
| Total | slope | 0.00496 | 0.00049 | 0.00399 | 0.00592 | 10.0824 | 0.00000 |
| intercept | 0.01618 | 0.02058 | −0.02416 | 0.05651 | 0.78602 | 0.43186 |
Figure 4Fisher’s Z by the ratio of male subjects.
Results of the regression meta-analysis alongside the “absence of spouse” ratio.
| Classification | Estimate | SE | −95% CI | +95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration | slope | 0.00331 | 0.00148 | 0.00041 | 0.00621 | 2.23553 | 0.02538 |
| intercept | 0.12914 | 0.0799 | −0.01587 | 0.27416 | 1.74546 | 0.08090 | |
| Frequency | slope | 0.00016 | 0.00148 | −0.00274 | 0.00306 | 0.11029 | 0.91218 |
| intercept | 0.19118 | 0.07399 | 0.04617 | 0.33620 | 2.58398 | 0.00977 | |
| Intensity | slope | 0.00046 | 0.00148 | −0.00337 | 0.00244 | −0.31391 | 0.75359 |
| intercept | 0.21115 | 0.07413 | 0.06586 | 0.35645 | 2.84836 | 0.00439 | |
| Total | slope | 0.00100 | 0.00085 | −0.00068 | 0.00267 | 1.16702 | 0.24320 |
| intercept | 0.17793 | 0.04274 | 0.09416 | 0.26171 | 4.16274 | 0.00003 |
Figure 5Fisher’s Z by the “absence of spouse” ratio.